Search results

  1. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    @Milkcrack , @gwiis, and @End shall be held in Contempt of Court. They shall each be fined $5,000. They are still ordered to comply with the Court ordered subpoena within 72 hours or face additional sanctions. Omegabiebel made themselves known to the court and the court missed it. I will not...
  2. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    My bad for missing this, please join the Judicairy Discord to submit these documents. You have 48 hours to do so. cc: @aubunny @Franciscus please join as well so I can add you to the closed court session.
  3. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    Here is the deal: 1. I do not find the argument that there was confusion based on frequent updates to a complaint to be reason enough to give grace on updating the answer to the complaint. The court allows complaints and answers to be modified during discovery; it is up to the counselors to keep...
  4. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    I had to drag out a piece of paper and write things down so I got the timeline correct. Here it is (again, my court, my timezome - MST). Sept. 10 8:23 AM - 72 hours were given for Plaintiff Closing Statements (deadline is Sept. 13, 8:23 AM) 8:39 AM - Plaintiff requests an additional 72 hours...
  5. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    Since there is a contested fact about judicial prejudice, I shall allow the evidence. Objection overruled. The objection is overruled. Since Juniperfig served as a Federal Judge that expereince provides at least some value concerning the issues raise on Fact 10. That said, I will be limiting...
  6. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending Inknet v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 86

    Sidebar created. For future PO reference it is Ticket #57.
  7. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    I will rule on this when I am able to be in front of a computer again. You may within the next 24 hours. The Defense shall have 72 hours to submit their closing statement when I rule on the objection and all else. I’ll make sure to let you know in that post when the time starts.
  8. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    You get 24, if you cannot post it have someone else in your firm take it on. I will remind counsel for the Defense that a speedy trial is guaranteed for citizens and that the counsel is not the one on trial but instead it is the Commonwealth.
  9. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    So here is the timeline and my ruling on the request for a 3.6 Default Judgement. All dates and Times in Mountain Time Zone by the way. The motion to amend the complaint to add facts 26-40 was created on August 9th and approved on August 9th. The objection on the amendment was created on August...
  10. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    It is correct that there is about 14 hours left.
  11. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    Enough everyone. This is the final warning that any more outbursts or pings shall be held in contempt for every instance. @Franciscus, what speficially has not yet been addressed. You have 24 hours to let the court know.
  12. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Culls v. Plura72 [2025] FCR 94

    Granted. The case is dismissed with prejudice. The court is adjourned.
  13. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed lucaaasserole v. Department of Public Affairs [2025] FCR 85

    This case is on hold until we determine a presiding officer following the resignation of Ko. Please join the Judiciary and ping myself when you are there for closed court.
  14. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending 12700k v. MattTheSavvy [2025] FCR 89

    This case is on hold until we determine a presiding officer following the resignation of Ko. To keep things decently moving forward, @Superwoops you have 72 hours to post your answer to the complaint.
  15. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending Inknet v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 86

    This case is on hold until we determine a presiding officer following the resignation of Ko. In the meantime, both counselors are to report to the Judiciary Discord (please ping me when you are there) to create a side bar.
  16. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Eddiegonza420 v. Home Investment [2025] FCR 95

    Denied. A public defender has been called.
  17. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    Here is what was asked to be provided. In light of your brief, this is optional to you, provide it if you wish.
  18. ameslap

    Expungement: Granted Franciscus - Expungement Request

    Seeing as there have been no objections by the Attorney General, the expungement is granted. DHS shall remove the crimes from the record.
Back
Top