Search results

Thank you, your honour. Some follow-up questions may need to be asked dependent on the witness answers. xerxesmc 1. Is it true that Dunder Mifflin DC has had more sales than Costco in the months of transcript transparency? 2. In your professional opinion as the leader of the Business Team in...

Your honour, as specified in §2 of our Claims for Relief, it states: This is an element of our case against the Defendant, to claim that this lack of lawfully required transparency resulted in less memes.

Your honour, Partypig678 is a frequent poster of various memes related to the server and is an expert on the topic. We hope to have him testify to assert the potential loss of meme culture that the Defendant's actions caused.

Your honour, I would like to call upon the following witnesses: xerxesmc DEC Deputy Secretary and Business Expert Hugebob23456 Former Congressman and President, Budget Expert MilkCrack Representative and member of the Congressional Budget Committee Partypig678 Meme Expert _Austin27_...

Yes, your honour. In accordance with the Objections Guide, the Defendant has made this objection on the mere "lack of relevance" to which I will briefly dispute. All of the evidence presented in this case poses significant relevancy to the matter at hand. I will explain the purpose to each point...

That would be correct, your honour. We are happy to concede our third item in the prayer for relief. However, we continue to assert that the Defendant has violated the law and therefore should be subject to all other terms.

Your honour, the Plaintiff would agree with dropping the 3rd request for a DPA TikTok video to be made. However, we do not believe that the government should be able to get off with this severe and shameful disregard for the law. The Defendant admits to their wrongdoing and how they have failed...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Dunder Mifflin DC Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF The Defendant, the Commonwealth of Redmont, has continuously...

China

After carefully considering the outcome of the case in the Federal Court, the Supreme Court has unanimously decided to reject this appeal at this time. This is because we believe the evidence presented in the case prove the explicit moving of money from a business with a legitimate purpose to a...

The Supreme Court has unanimously decided to reject this appeal for your contempt charge. This is because we do not feel it is within the scope of our constitutional power to overturn contempt charges in ongoing cases. This is a result of the constitutional clause that specifies verdicts...

Technofid

West_Cats

China

555

Given that the Defendant has omitted any sort of defence, the court will proceed with a default judgement. I find the lack of defence to be somewhat unfortunate as I believe this case may have posed some relevance in terms of the legal extent of the Legislative Standards Act. Nonetheless...

To clarify, is the State omitting any sort of defence in this case by agreeing to the Plaintiff's Prayer for Relief?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the Crusaders At Law v. the Commonwealth of Redmont. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment. I will be presiding...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Case No. 11-2021-05-02 I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION 1. The Prosecution alleges that the Defendant used their position as auditor to unlawfully share private information in the town of Oakridge's discord. 2. The Prosecution claims that...

Given the allocated time of 48 hours and the additional 24 hours has surpassed, the Supreme Court will be convening tomorrow to deliver a verdict of default judgement. After multiple warnings and notices from the court we have not gotten a response from the Defendant and will be moving forward...