Search results

  1. C

    Blind Typing!

    splatcat1349
  2. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    Your honor, This is the current list I have of all plots beneficially owned by the Galactic Empire of Redmont c179 c116 c454 c279 c607 c364 c226 s094 s095 s096 s097 s119 Do note that all of the s plots (so94, s095, s096, s097, s119) are unfinished and I believe are awaiting a paste from the...
  3. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Submission of interrogatories under Rule 4.8 The plaintiff requests that the defendant answer the following questions truthfully Was any action by the DCT against the Galactic Empire of Redmont politically motivated in any way? Did any...
  4. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS In accordance with Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Plaintiff requests the following from the Defendant: 1. Any message containing the words "yeet" "ger" "galactic empire"...
  5. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    While we cannot provide a full list of all properties owned by the Galactic Empire of Redmont, as businesses/parties cannot own properties, we will provide a list of all properties owned by yeet_boy, the leader and "Grand Admiral" of the Galactic Empire of Redmont of P-10 through P-013 This list...
  6. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff amends the Prayer for Relief section of the Complaint as follows: (P-009 Image) All within () added
  7. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff amends the Prayer for Relief section of the Complaint as follows: {2. Eviction posts, c607, c226, c279, c454, c364 is archived and cannot be viewed. 3. GER discord 4. Inspector policy 5. Eviction policy 6. Political party...
  8. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    Response IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, An amicus curiae brief from Dartanboy would help cover a potential motivation and reason for why the actions of the defendant took place. It would help this court reach a fair and just verdict in this case.
  9. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    Response IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, These are frankly minor things, and we will add them if the original post if the judge wishes for that to happen.
  10. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    Response IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Each of these 3 individuals are DCT employees, and I believe that their testimony will be useful in proving our case. I ask that the court hold the decision on this objection until after the discovery process is over.
  11. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    Response IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, Plaintiff counsel failed to count here, if I truly meant to lie to the court then why link to the evidence proving the lie in the exact same post?
  12. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT EMERGENCY INJUNCTION Due to this lawsuit coming shortly before the eviction date, we request the DCT be enjoined (prevented) from evicting the plots in this case (c454, c279, c226, c607) for the duration of this case
  13. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff amends the Prayer for Relief section of the Complaint as follows: Was able to zip the schematic files, they are here now
  14. C

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 78

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Galactic Empire of Redmont (Represented by MZLD law) Plaintiff v. Department of Construction and Transportation Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: This is a case of major...
  15. C

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vendeka vs absinf [2025] FCR 61

    Your honor The plaintiff agrees with the proposal of the defense in this matter
  16. C

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vendeka vs absinf [2025] FCR 61

    Motion IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT Your honor Per the summons: The public defender program was given 48 hours to provide an answer to our complaint, it has been over 5 hours since that deadline has passed The Plaintiff respectfully...
  17. C

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Reveille Legion v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 63

    Motion MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI We ask the case be dismissed without prejudice.
  18. C

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Reveille Legion v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 63

    We respectfully request the court provide a ruling on our Emergency Injunction as we work on filing the case. We were only provided with relevant information a short while ago, and will be unable to file this case before the game starts.
  19. C

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Reveille Legion v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 63

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION The DPA has fixed the date of the Finals for a football game, displaying bias with the date favoring one party over the other, without providing: 1. Fair and equal scheduling consideration for both teams 2...
  20. C

    Lawsuit: Dismissed .mgchamp2339 v absinf [2025] FCR 60

    Motion MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI This case filing was a mistake; the correct filing is in the other case related to this matter. We ask that the case be dismissed without prejudice.
Back
Top