Search results

  1. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    Your honor, I believe that it is now time for the trial to commence and for the plaintiff to give an opening statement, in accordance with the new court rules.
  2. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    Yes, the plaintiff consents to an extension of discovery.
  3. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    The plaintiff would like to submit _bashi_ and Vernicia as witnesses.
  4. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    No, your honor, nothing is currently pending.
  5. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    The plaintiff would like to call MikeOxlonger1 and Vernicia as witnesses.
  6. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT The defendant has failed to appear before the court over 72 hours after the posted writ of summons. The plaintiff thereby motions for a default judgement based on the established facts of the case.
  7. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    Thank you, your honor. The defendant seeks to have the court dismiss the case at hand, in whole or in part, on the grounds of a series of highly disputable technicalities. The court has already dismissed the defendant's objection to the first supposed error, and both the second and third seem...
  8. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    Your honor, the defense respectfully requests permission to respond to this Motion to Dismiss.
  9. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    The defense is very much willing to call _bashi_ as a witness at the appropriate time, should it be the court's desire. The defense was not made aware of _bashi_'s desire to file an amicus brief prior to its filing.
  10. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    Your honor, if I may, this is a moot point. In the first place, the complaint in fact never lists Vernicia's nationality as Russian - that was the claim made by the defendant in in-game chat - rather, the complaint simply responds to said claim at face value. In the second place, nationality...
  11. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Vernicia (Represented by Dragon Law Firm) Plaintiff v. OmegaBiebel Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On January 11th, 2025, Vernicia posted an advertisement using in-game chat that...
  12. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Vernicia (Represented by Dragon Law Firm) Plaintiff v. RylandW Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On January 11th, 2025, Vernicia posted an advertisement using in-game chat that...
  13. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] DCR 1

    1. The defense's response to the previous question only meant that no charges have been publicly filed yet. 2. No non-public information has been revealed.
  14. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] DCR 1

    Relevance Your honor, the nine screenshots of evidence submitted here have next to nothing to do with the defamation case at hand. The plaintiff was given the opportunity to provide context for the incident regarding leaking classified documents in responding to the interrogatory, when the...
  15. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] DCR 1

    Breach of Procedure Your honor, the plaintiff is allowed five relevant questions. These, along with the three already answered, make six.
  16. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] DCR 1

    1. Those charges are pending, even if they haven't been filed yet. Furthermore, it is outside the scope of this civil case to prove or disprove a criminal charge. 2. 11:59 PM, EST, January 2nd. 3. My client is aware that you joined and left immediately at 12:48 PM. My client does not know when...
  17. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] DCR 1

    Narrative The question asked was a simple one; mentions of the writ of detention, invocation of rights, and rejoining of the Discord were not necessary to answer the question.
  18. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] DCR 1

    Relevance The first screenshot provided does not contain any statement that the plaintiff is alleging to be defamatory, and thus is not relevant to the case.
Back
Top