Search results

Relevance Your honor, the nine screenshots of evidence submitted here have next to nothing to do with the defamation case at hand. The plaintiff was given the opportunity to provide context for the incident regarding leaking classified documents in responding to the interrogatory, when the...

Breach of Procedure Your honor, the plaintiff is allowed five relevant questions. These, along with the three already answered, make six.

1. Those charges are pending, even if they haven't been filed yet. Furthermore, it is outside the scope of this civil case to prove or disprove a criminal charge. 2. 11:59 PM, EST, January 2nd. 3. My client is aware that you joined and left immediately at 12:48 PM. My client does not know when...

Narrative The question asked was a simple one; mentions of the writ of detention, invocation of rights, and rejoining of the Discord were not necessary to answer the question.

Relevance The first screenshot provided does not contain any statement that the plaintiff is alleging to be defamatory, and thus is not relevant to the case.

Interrogatory 1. Isn't it true you were found guilty of accomplice to corruption in the past? 2. Isn't it true that you leaked classified information? 3. Isn't it true that you left the Department of Justice Discord server during official interrogation? The defense reserves the right to ask up...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT COUNTERCLAIM AlexanderLove (Represented by Dragon Law Firm) Counterplaintiff v. xEndeavour Counterdefendant COMPLAINT The Counterplaintiff complains against the Counterdefendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE COUNTERPLAINTIFF I...