The motion to reconsider the Emergency Injunction from both sides is denied. The STV process is specifically laid out in the Electoral Act.
If a candidate has fewer votes than the threshold, the candidate with the fewest votes are eliminated. (see Electoral Act 8(4)(a)). When a candidate is...
The motion to reconsider is denied. The law is very clear and it states that the two highest voted candidates are the ones to be included in the runoff election.
The Supreme Court is granting an alternate emergency injunction. The current administration which the President is Lcn will remain in caretaker mode for the duration of this case. The department of state is ordered to begin a runoff election following the mandated process. The results of this...
The appeal is granted. The appellant was not explicitly ordered to stop speaking. The law establishes that a person must be warned first before they can be held in contempt of court. Given a warning was not issued the Supreme Court has decided to overturn the contempt charge in a 3-0 decision...
The motion to recuse is denied. I trust the good intentions of magistrate @Mask3D_WOLF and that they did not mean in any way to be biased toward any of the involved parties.
In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to grant the motion to dismiss.
The plaintiff stated that the Vice President by assuming the role of Acting President surrendered their original position. The constitution of our nation states clearly that at times where the President is unable to...
After careful consideration, the Supreme Court has upheld the ruling on the original appeal. The court finds no compelling arguments to change the initial judgment, and we maintain the ruling of the Federal Court on this matter.
The Supreme Court has decided to maintain its original decision to decline hearing this case. We believe this can be handled internally by the Department. However, we remove the frivolous charge.
In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court grants the motion to dismiss. We find that the Plaintiff's claim lacks the required legal grounds to continue. The commonwealth's claim of a factual error under Rule 5.14 is compelling given that Freeze_Line was not appointed officially as Acting Attorney...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.