Search results

  1. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SCR 3 [2025] Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    Both the objection and the motion to strike are sustained.
  2. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SCR 3 [2025] Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    The motion to reconsider the Emergency Injunction from both sides is denied. The STV process is specifically laid out in the Electoral Act. If a candidate has fewer votes than the threshold, the candidate with the fewest votes are eliminated. (see Electoral Act 8(4)(a)). When a candidate is...
  3. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SCR 3 [2025] Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    The motion to reconsider is denied. The law is very clear and it states that the two highest voted candidates are the ones to be included in the runoff election.
  4. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SCR 3 [2025] Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    The mandated process in the Presidential Runoff Act. There must be a runoff election between xEndeavour and 1950minecrafter
  5. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SCR 3 [2025] Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    The Supreme Court is granting an alternate emergency injunction. The current administration which the President is Lcn will remain in caretaker mode for the duration of this case. The department of state is ordered to begin a runoff election following the mandated process. The results of this...
  6. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SCR 3 [2025] Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    @Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont.
  7. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Pepecuu v. YourChillGamer (Formerly Ollie_army) [2025] DCR 16

    Case dismissed at the request of the plaintiff.
  8. Aladeen

    Appeal: Accepted [2024] FCR 107 Appeal - Contempt Appeal - Appeal

    The appeal is granted. The appellant was not explicitly ordered to stop speaking. The law establishes that a person must be warned first before they can be held in contempt of court. Given a warning was not issued the Supreme Court has decided to overturn the contempt charge in a 3-0 decision...
  9. Aladeen

    Appeal: Denied [2024] FCR 77 - Appeal Request

    The Supreme Court has voted to deny this appeal due to the lack of legal reasoning in the appeal. We apologize for the extreme tardiness.
  10. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. juniperfig [2025] DCR 10

    The motion to recuse is denied. I trust the good intentions of magistrate @Mask3D_WOLF and that they did not mean in any way to be biased toward any of the involved parties.
  11. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2

    In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to grant the motion to dismiss. The plaintiff stated that the Vice President by assuming the role of Acting President surrendered their original position. The constitution of our nation states clearly that at times where the President is unable to...
  12. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2

    @Alexander P. Love please provide proof of representation.
  13. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2

    The Supreme Court will be rejecting this emergency injunction in a 2-0 decision.
  14. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2

    @lcn is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of UnityMaster v. lcn
  15. Aladeen

    Appeal: Denied [2024] FCR 114 - Appeal - Appeal

    After careful consideration, the Supreme Court has upheld the ruling on the original appeal. The court finds no compelling arguments to change the initial judgment, and we maintain the ruling of the Federal Court on this matter.
  16. Aladeen

    Appeal: Denied Commonwealth v. Commonwealth | SCR Case No Docket Number - Appeal

    The Supreme Court has decided to maintain its original decision to decline hearing this case. We believe this can be handled internally by the Department. However, we remove the frivolous charge.
  17. Aladeen

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Titan Law v. the Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 36

    In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court grants the motion to dismiss. We find that the Plaintiff's claim lacks the required legal grounds to continue. The commonwealth's claim of a factual error under Rule 5.14 is compelling given that Freeze_Line was not appointed officially as Acting Attorney...
Back
Top