Search results

A Modified Emergency Injunction will be Granted 1. All seized assets of Vangard Co. remain frozen 2. All seized businesses remain intact and non-dissolved 3. All day to day business operations will be halted. In essense, Vangaurd Co. will be completely frozen for the duration of this case in...

Motion to dismiss denied as the Plaintiff is amending their complaint. As Summary Judgement as been agreed upon by both parties, this case is im recess pending verdict

You may.

@juniperfig is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Gnomewhisperer and Gnomecorp v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 47.

This case is dismissed without prejudice at the request of the plaintiff

This Emergency Injunction is denied According to section 18(1)(b) of the Judicial Standards Act it states: b. Emergency - Injunctions that are issued before the court has tried a case to prevent harm. If the applicant fails to file a lawsuit within 4 hours of requesting an emergency injunction...

I will be denying this emergency injunction for the following reasons. Emergency Injunctions are to prevent harm and while there may be harm caused by losing access to one's capital, it would not be irreversible as access can be restored and there seems to be no reason to believe any capital...

The court accepts the plea deal and orders the divestiture of Uffizi Holdings from Vanguard Private Bank and Discover Bank.

You have 72 hours to provide your answer to complaint

The Emergency Injunction is granted in order to prevent harm to client information, cash and for the companies in this case. If the consolidation were to continue it could prevent either Discovery or Vanguard and their customers to return back to what they were before.

@supersuperking is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Uffizi Holdings [2025] FCR 46

The Emergency Injunction is granted The Commonwealth shall refrain from transferring or selling c342 for the duration of this case.

@juniperfig is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Plura72 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 45

The court is Sua Sponte this case. The Judiciary has searched and cannot find a clear second party to summon. The Commonwealth's complaint has no mention of a CEO or owner of Uffizi Holdings, and it is not the Judiciary's job to search for such information. Even though it is not our job to...

You have 72 hours to provide your answer to complaint

@juniperfig is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Doctheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

@juniperfig is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of End v. Commonwealth [2025] FCR 44

I am accepting the motion to dismiss for lack of claim. As for the first claim based on defamation, the claim rests on a single person's opinion which to the courts current understanding is deported. This directly harms the defense's ability to argue their case as it is impossible to refute...

you may

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT 15fine v. wttn2c [2025] DCR 32. I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The defendant murdered the plaintiff twice and pointed a gun at them 2. This murder with the pointed gun prevented the plaintiff from walking through Redmont without fear II...