Search results

  1. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed lcn v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 35

    The topic is the application of slavery to various situations. I write this as a former representative, judge, and attorney general.
  2. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed lcn v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 35

    Would it be possible to file it within 48 hours?
  3. Mask3D_WOLF

    Not sure where our friendship went wrong, but happy birthday nonetheless

    Not sure where our friendship went wrong, but happy birthday nonetheless
  4. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MrEntomology v. Pug_In_A_Burrito [2025] DCR 26

    Plaintiff, please provide proof of representation.
  5. Mask3D_WOLF

    BC+2

    BC+2
  6. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MrEntomology v. Pug_In_A_Burrito [2025] DCR 26

    @Pug_In_A_Burrito is required to appear before the District Court in the case of MrEntomology v. Pug_In_A_Burrito.
  7. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank v. Sp1d3rr [2025] DCR 25

    @sp1d3rr is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Volt Bank v. Sp1d3rr.
  8. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    The defense has 72 hours to present their closing statement.
  9. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    A judicial officer has been contacted to review the motion. To interpret it as meaning specifically a federal judge would be inconsistent with your motion, which states that if a judge does not voluntarily recuse, then a second judge may respond. In addition, a Supreme Court Justice could...
  10. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank v. Sp1d3rr [2025] DCR 25

    The emergency injunction is granted. Summons will shortly follow.
  11. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Present, however I ask the court to please be flexible with response times from myself due to severe weather.
  12. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    The court asked if the witness knew what tenancy is and why they therefore chose to answer the questions pertaining to it. These are questions pertaining to the orderly administration of my courtroom and are well-within my jurisdiction as presiding judge. Neither the plaintiff nor defense are...
  13. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    Regarding the stricken material, I will be granting the motion to reconsider and will amend my order to only be striking answers pertaining to tenancy. Regarding the objection, it is overruled. The court accepts that the witness did not have sufficient knowledge of the meaning of tenancy and...
  14. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    The court dismisses the witness from the case and strikes all of their statements from the record. We will be moving onto closing statements, the plaintiff has 72 hours to make theirs.
  15. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    Or why did you not research the definition? This is to be answered 24 hours from the original message.
Back
Top