Defendant is reminded to familiarize themself with the Court Rules and Procedures, in particular Rule 3.2.
The Court will be modifying your red "NEITHER AFFIRM NOR DENY" claims to appear green. If you wish to effectively DENY the claims, please file an Amendment to your Answer.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - EVIDENCE
The court is inclined to dismiss the case due to the unavailability of the medal.tv clips.
Evidence is required to be permanently available per the Court Rules & Procedures, Rule 4.6.
Is the Plaintiff able to...
The Defendant has been long-deported. The Public Defender Program is hereby ordered to produce a Public Defender as soon as they are reasonably able to.
Seeing as you lack the qualifications to practice law in the District Court, your messages are struck.
You are further warned not to respond to cases prior to summons.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
COURT ORDER
On Long-Deported Rights
The Court finds, after consulting the Staff Team, that ToadKing__ is not afforded any rights due to being long-deported.
On Public Defense
Public Defenders are permitted, however, to provide a procedural...
If you are not pursuing a civil action, you should file a motion to nolle prosequi.
We will not hold onto unpursued cases clogging up our extensive backlog.
I am taking over this case. I am considering whether ToadKing__ has any rights, and whether to consider the Motion to Dismiss at all.
No deadlines for the parties of this case at this time.
The Federal Court has no choice but to deny this appeal on the basis that Plaintiff is not qualified to practice law within the Federal Court, as they are not a Barrister with the proper Qualification for this case.
I will, however, allow the Plaintiff to re-file an appeal within the next two...
Attorney General @AmityBlamity (or another individual legally qualified to represent the Commonwealth) is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Korromf v. Department of Homeland Security.
Plaintiff is hereby warned not to make unnecessary and distracting posts. Further outbursts will not be tolerated and will result in Contempt of Court charges.
The Court believes UserMart is the correct Defendant, noting:
Culls owns all shares of UserMart, Inc.
Culls is the CEO of UserMart, Inc.
The rented region appears to be owned by UserMart, Inc.
No policy of UserMart has been produced to suggest this was against its own corporate policy.
As...
The courtroom is not the place for such discussions.
The Defendant is reminded not to speak in the case prior to being summoned. Further out-of-turn communications will result in Contempt of Court charges.
If the Plaintiff wishes to withdraw the case, they must file a Motion to Nolle Prosequi.
This case is dismissed sua sponte without prejudice. As the Plaintiff lacks legal qualification to file a case.
Grayboy1000, if you wish to refile the case you must possess at least the Solicitor qualification or obtain qualified legal counsel to file on your behalf.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - STANDING
"Standing consists of three elements. First, the individual must have suffered an injury caused by a clearly identifiable second party or affected by an application of law. Second, the cause of the injury must...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.