Search results

  1. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed .Farmerkalechip v. GnomeCorp [2026] DCR 110

    Defendant is reminded to familiarize themself with the Court Rules and Procedures, in particular Rule 3.2. The Court will be modifying your red "NEITHER AFFIRM NOR DENY" claims to appear green. If you wish to effectively DENY the claims, please file an Amendment to your Answer.
  2. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Pending lnvlsbie v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 115

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - EVIDENCE The court is inclined to dismiss the case due to the unavailability of the medal.tv clips. Evidence is required to be permanently available per the Court Rules & Procedures, Rule 4.6. Is the Plaintiff able to...
  3. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed .Farmerkalechip v. GnomeCorp [2026] DCR 110

    You may file your Amicus Curiae Brief within the next 24 hours.
  4. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed .Farmerkalechip v. GnomeCorp [2026] DCR 110

    GnomeCorp (CC: @GnomeWhisperer ) is required to appear before the District Court in the case of .Farmerkalechip v. GnomeCorp.
  5. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed smellyboi5 v. AirMailmedl814 [2026] DCR 87

    The Defendant has been long-deported. The Public Defender Program is hereby ordered to produce a Public Defender as soon as they are reasonably able to.
  6. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed smellyboi5 v. AirMailmedl814 [2026] DCR 87

    Seeing as you lack the qualifications to practice law in the District Court, your messages are struck. You are further warned not to respond to cases prior to summons.
  7. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 400kayear v. LarpTiktok

    Case dismissed without prejudice at request of the Plaintiff.
  8. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. ToadKing_ [2026] FCR 34

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT COURT ORDER On Long-Deported Rights The Court finds, after consulting the Staff Team, that ToadKing__ is not afforded any rights due to being long-deported. On Public Defense Public Defenders are permitted, however, to provide a procedural...
  9. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 400kayear v. LarpTiktok

    If you are not pursuing a civil action, you should file a motion to nolle prosequi. We will not hold onto unpursued cases clogging up our extensive backlog.
  10. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. ToadKing_ [2026] FCR 34

    I am taking over this case. I am considering whether ToadKing__ has any rights, and whether to consider the Motion to Dismiss at all. No deadlines for the parties of this case at this time.
  11. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 400kayear v. LarpTiktok

    @MyHeartMan is required to appear before the District Court in the case of 400kayear v. LarpTiktok.
  12. Dartanboy

    Appeal: Denied [2026] DCR 55 - Appeal

    The Federal Court has no choice but to deny this appeal on the basis that Plaintiff is not qualified to practice law within the Federal Court, as they are not a Barrister with the proper Qualification for this case. I will, however, allow the Plaintiff to re-file an appeal within the next two...
  13. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Korromf v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 116

    Attorney General @AmityBlamity (or another individual legally qualified to represent the Commonwealth) is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Korromf v. Department of Homeland Security.
  14. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SCRGabriele180 v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 159

    Plaintiff is hereby warned not to make unnecessary and distracting posts. Further outbursts will not be tolerated and will result in Contempt of Court charges.
  15. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed TheLuckyBear, ClothingBrand v. Culls, Sam07x [2026] DCR 94

    The Court believes UserMart is the correct Defendant, noting: Culls owns all shares of UserMart, Inc. Culls is the CEO of UserMart, Inc. The rented region appears to be owned by UserMart, Inc. No policy of UserMart has been produced to suggest this was against its own corporate policy. As...
  16. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 400kayear v. LarpTiktok

    The courtroom is not the place for such discussions. The Defendant is reminded not to speak in the case prior to being summoned. Further out-of-turn communications will result in Contempt of Court charges. If the Plaintiff wishes to withdraw the case, they must file a Motion to Nolle Prosequi.
  17. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed grayboy1000 v. marci2084 [2026] DCR 111

    This case is dismissed sua sponte without prejudice. As the Plaintiff lacks legal qualification to file a case. Grayboy1000, if you wish to refile the case you must possess at least the Solicitor qualification or obtain qualified legal counsel to file on your behalf.
  18. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed TheLuckyBear, ClothingBrand v. Culls, Sam07x [2026] DCR 94

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - STANDING "Standing consists of three elements. First, the individual must have suffered an injury caused by a clearly identifiable second party or affected by an application of law. Second, the cause of the injury must...
  19. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed TheLuckyBear, ClothingBrand v. Culls, Sam07x [2026] DCR 94

    You are reminded not to speak in the case prior to being summoned. Your motion is struck.
Back
Top