A judicial officer has been contacted to review the motion.
To interpret it as meaning specifically a federal judge would be inconsistent with your motion, which states that if a judge does not voluntarily recuse, then a second judge may respond. In addition, a Supreme Court Justice could...
The court asked if the witness knew what tenancy is and why they therefore chose to answer the questions pertaining to it. These are questions pertaining to the orderly administration of my courtroom and are well-within my jurisdiction as presiding judge. Neither the plaintiff nor defense are...
Regarding the stricken material, I will be granting the motion to reconsider and will amend my order to only be striking answers pertaining to tenancy.
Regarding the objection, it is overruled. The court accepts that the witness did not have sufficient knowledge of the meaning of tenancy and...
The court dismisses the witness from the case and strikes all of their statements from the record. We will be moving onto closing statements, the plaintiff has 72 hours to make theirs.
The court has ruled that both the question and answer are out of line, regardless of any objections. If you would like me to reconsider my ruling, please make an appropriate motion.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Monacht v. MikeOxlonger1 (UUID c5cbdc6f-b927-4029-9fae-73e385516a76) [2025] DCR/FCR/SCR 1
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. Defendant MikeOxlonger1 (UUID c5cbdc6f-b927-4029-9fae-73e385516a76) attacked the plaintiff with an axe, provoking...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.