Search results

  1. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    A judicial officer has been contacted to review the motion. To interpret it as meaning specifically a federal judge would be inconsistent with your motion, which states that if a judge does not voluntarily recuse, then a second judge may respond. In addition, a Supreme Court Justice could...
  2. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank v. Sp1d3rr [2025] DCR 25

    The emergency injunction is granted. Summons will shortly follow.
  3. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Present, however I ask the court to please be flexible with response times from myself due to severe weather.
  4. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    The court asked if the witness knew what tenancy is and why they therefore chose to answer the questions pertaining to it. These are questions pertaining to the orderly administration of my courtroom and are well-within my jurisdiction as presiding judge. Neither the plaintiff nor defense are...
  5. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    Regarding the stricken material, I will be granting the motion to reconsider and will amend my order to only be striking answers pertaining to tenancy. Regarding the objection, it is overruled. The court accepts that the witness did not have sufficient knowledge of the meaning of tenancy and...
  6. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    The court dismisses the witness from the case and strikes all of their statements from the record. We will be moving onto closing statements, the plaintiff has 72 hours to make theirs.
  7. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    Or why did you not research the definition? This is to be answered 24 hours from the original message.
  8. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    Then why did you answer the questions pertaining to it?
  9. Mask3D_WOLF

    The dumbest DC things

    You reading this
  10. Mask3D_WOLF

    Birthday is happy todaying

    Birthday is happy todaying
  11. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    Witness, are you aware of what tenancy is? Please reply in 24 hours and declare if you have any amendments to your answers on the basis of this.
  12. Mask3D_WOLF

    [IMG]

  13. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    You have 24 hours to provide any more follow-up questions.
  14. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    Public Defender, please display appropriate credentials and proof of representation within 24 hours.
  15. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Dearev v. irbelguim [2025] DCR 21

    I will be dismissing this case for failure to substantiate a claim for relief with evidence (Rules and Procedures 5.5). The court thanks all involved.
  16. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrCheesGuy (Formerly siebelol7) v. ForeverShadow1 [2025] DCR 15

    The court has ruled that both the question and answer are out of line, regardless of any objections. If you would like me to reconsider my ruling, please make an appropriate motion.
  17. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Monacht v. MikeOxlonger1 [2025] DCR 17

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Monacht v. MikeOxlonger1 (UUID c5cbdc6f-b927-4029-9fae-73e385516a76) [2025] DCR/FCR/SCR 1 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. Defendant MikeOxlonger1 (UUID c5cbdc6f-b927-4029-9fae-73e385516a76) attacked the plaintiff with an axe, provoking...
Back
Top