Search results

@.Hannah35210 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Rqtting v. .Hannah35210 [2026] DCR 107.

This motion is granted. The case of Servalot v. Uwenn [2026] DCR 105 is dismissed without prejudice.

Excellent. Please post an answer to complaint within 72 hours.

Understood, please attach proof that the Plaintiff consents to be represented by the second chair as well.

Acknowledged. Please submit an answer to complaint in the next 72 hours and edit the above message to show proof of representation as a permanent attachment (an image) in accordance with the Information - Court Rules and Procedures.

Yes. The Court would require the Plaintiff's written consent for your colleague to represent them, as proof of representation only extends to yourself in this case.

Please reannounce your presence within 72 hours.

@hydra10794 is commanded to appear before the District Court in the case of Fractionnn v. hydra10794 [2026] DCR 106.

I recuse myself.

@uwenn is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Servalot v. Uwenn [2026] DCR 105.

@Palacity Counselor, if your intention was to have this: instead say "CIVIL ACTION", I encourage you to amend your filing. You have permission to amend only this section of your filing.

Defendant was sent the following in-game mail.

@LegoMasterW472 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of MJL_ v. LegoMasterW472 [2026] DCR 118.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - QUALIFICATION The Court, upon sua sponte review of @lnvlsbie's legal qualifications, finds that counsel lacks the admin law qualification. The Court is concerned that the subject matter of this case may require said...

@AmityBlamity is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of .CrownedEtyYT, waygooda v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 60

I recuse from this action due to prior encounters with the Defendant.

Your honour, I am no longer employed at the DOJ. No one else at the DOJ is receiving notifications for this case. I will make the relevant parties aware cc: @ameslap @AmityBlamity

The Defense neither affirms nor denies fact 18. May we edit our answer to show this? Additionally, I will not be representing the Commonwealth moving further.

I remember Ethamn! He was a great leader at the SKP and a good guy. He should come back!

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honour, Plaintiff moves for the Court to only consider the now-deprecated Court Rules and Procedure because the present case was filed when these regulations were still in place. The Defence believes...