Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBPOENA Federal Judge Superwoops, in the jurisdiction of the Federal Court, orders the Staff Team to produce the following records in accordance with this order filed in the case of StarKlower v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 73...

Discovery is now open and will remain open for 5 days.

Plaintiff, this is your last warning. Do not bloat this Court with meritless objections. The language used is fully permissible. Objection overruled.

Plaintiff, please review the Information - Court Rules and Procedures before throwing perjury objections around. You need proof that the statement is false, and proof that it was made in knowledge of its falsity. This objection does not prove that any statements were false. In fact, many items...

Overruled, Plaintiff is allowed to respond to objections without permission from the PO.

Overruled, Plaintiff is allowed to respond to objections without permission from the PO.

Sustained. Plaintiff has been warned. No content will be struck.

Objection overruled, this is essentially the same objection. Plaintiff is warned against boating this docket. (referring to Docket #82)

Overruled, this point is under contention and will be resolved at the conclusion of this case.

The Commonwealth has 72 hours from this post to submit their opening statements.

Granted.

Granted. Let me know if you need any further extensions.

Motion is granted. Defendant was seen otherwise active on Discord. As such, I find @Cpvp_dog in Contempt of Court. They shall be fined 30 Penalty Units and be imprisoned for 5 minutes. We are now moving into Inquest proceedings. Discovery is now open for 5 days. Plaintiff reserves the right to...

The Staff team will require a set of key messages to verify (instead of the whole block). Please submit such a list to the Court soon.

@Novakerbal are you still pursuing this civil action?

Plaintiff, you have 72 hours from this post to submit your opening statements. Note that time timer was restarted due to my delays as PO.

The Court finds that a ruling in favour of this motion would be premature. An evidentiary basis has been set for the charge, it is now on the Plaintiff to explain (and show through witness testimony) how they allege the conduct rises to the level of Wrongful Arrest or Detention under the Act of...

All objections may be replied to without permission from the PO.

Motion denied. We still have all of Discovery.

Overruled, the venue was the Federal Court at that time (see Information - Regulations of the Federal Court)