Search results

The second [2026] has been removed in line with same-year formatting.

Following the passage of the Unified Constitution II Act, the Judicial Standards Act is no longer constitutional. As statute cannot amend or override the Constitution, the section giving the Speaker of Congress the role as acting Justice in this circumstance is no longer valid. @Kaiserin_ is...

Speaker @Kaiserin_ is present as second acting Justice.

I am confused as to what exactly this is trying to say. Furthermore, absent a quorum of 2, I cannot answer any questions, provide any guidance, or do anything procedural with this case. Final note: were it not clear already, with the recusal of Default Chief Justice Matthew100x, I will be...

This case is an appeal of a decision made in an appeal. In re DCR 108 [2025] | FCR 7 [2026]. Upon the resignation of Chief Justice Aladeen, there are two sitting Justices on the Supreme Court of Redmont. There is constitutional language detailing what is to happen when there are only two judges...

Seeing as how no reply brief has been filed, we will be in recess pending verdict.

Note: Edited to put the Smallfries4 dissent as to Standing in the proper section for clarity.

We release today an opinion of two parts. The first part is the unanimous opinion of the Court regarding sentencing of Defendant, authored by Associate Justice Smallfries4. The second opinion, originally withheld for brevity of proceedings, details the decision to grant standing and is authored...

With nothing to respond to, the court will now go into recess pending verdict.

I appreciate the apology, but for fairness's sake this is out of order and is struck. Just as I did with the Commonwealth, I find the defense in contempt of court and assign ten penalty units each to @Julia_ and @asexualdinosaur.

The Commonwealth (@Dogeington) shall have seventy-two hours to file their response brief, if they so choose.

The deadline was for 7:30 PM today, but you do not get an unlimited right to edit filings. Filings must be ready to send when they are sent for the interest of opposing parties. The only exception is the original complaint. I understand you have things going on, and that is okay, but we do need...

Ill grant an extension until Wednesday at 7:30 PM, CST.

The deadline has passed. I find the Commonwealth in contempt of court and assign ten penalty units to @Kaiserin_. @Julia_ & @asexualdinosaur have seventy-two hours to file their sentencing brief.

Very well.

Very well. As laid out, the appellee (@Inknet & @Franciscus) shall have seventy-two hours to submit their brief.

Notice to the public: In a 3-0 vote, the Supreme Court has altered the verdict above. Specifically, we have added the final two paragraphs before the stand-alone final sentence of the guilty verdict. It should be noted that this was not a post-hoc addition of something new we thought about, but...

You tell me. If you think your initial filing covers what you would discuss in your brief, we can simply move on. The point is to allow appellants to not have to post their entire brief, and then do all that work just to get denied. Nothing stopping appellants from doing as you have done, however.

In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court grants this appeal. The Commonwealth shall have seventy-two hours to post their appellant brief.

I apologize, the Commonwealth may instead be represented by @Dogeington, who is now Attorney General. If this is not the arrangement please disregard. Just wanted to make sure I properly pinged those interested.