Lawsuit: Adjourned Andreasp15 v. SecuroservYT [2024] FCR 36

Status
Not open for further replies.
PoetRini

PoetRini

Citizen
Public Affairs Department
Redmont Bar Assoc.
PoetRini
PoetRini
mediaadvisor
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
59
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Andreasp15 (Lovely Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

SecuroservYT
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

SecuroservYT intruded on a claimed plot of Andreasp15 and tragically killed 11 of their villagers, additionally, four of his name-tagged zombies were also killed. This upsetting and unsettling incident has caused a disturbance to Andreasp15 peaceful life in the wild.


WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF


I. PARTIES
1. Andreasp15 (The plaintiff)
2. SecuroservYT (The defendant)

II. FACTS
1. SecuroservYT killed 11 villagers in the wild while not given any permission by Andreasp15.
2. This caused a disturbance to Andreasp15 peaceful life in the wild due to the loss of their villager and zombie.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. 11 of Andreasp15's villagers were killed along with his 4 zombies.
2. SecuroservYT actions have disrupted the peaceful life and emotional damage to Andreasp15 because of the loss of his villagers.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
$5000 for punitive damages
$10000 for emotional damages
$5000 for loss of enjoyment in Redmont
$12000 for consequential damages
$6400 for legal fees

VI. Witnesses
Vernicia
Inalite

VII. Evidence

https://imgur.com/a/uqcctnj

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 28th day of February 2024
 
Last edited:
Seal_Judiciary.png



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@SecuroservYT is required to appear before the court in the case of the Andreasp15 v. SecuroservYT. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​
 
Your honour, on behalf of the Lovely Law firm, I would like to remind you that 72 hours have passed and that a summary judgement be given
 
Apologies for not responding sooner, had irl matters to attend to.

We will be moving into Summary Judgement however thus the Court is in recess pending a verdict.
 

Verdict



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Andreasp15 v. SecuroservYT [2024] FCR 36

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant killed the villagers without permission.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. Failed to appear.

III. THE COURT OPINION
1. This will be a very short Court Opinion. There is clear evidence of the action taking place and thus I won't go on about the whole case as I see no real way I could rule against the Plaintiff in this case.
2. I will not be granting the full Prayer for Reliefs however due to the sheer amount being requested.

IV. DECISION
1. I hereby rule in favor of the Plaintiff and order the Department of Justice to fine the Defendant:

  • $3,000 for Punitive.
  • $1,000 for Loss of Enjoyment.
  • $5,000 for Consequential Damages.
  • $1,800 for Legal Fees.
  • $10,800 in total.

The Federal Court thanks all involved.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top