Lawsuit: Pending Orbb_1215 vs. SuperWoops [2026] DCR 158

A

Areaous

Citizen
Desertstorm49
Desertstorm49
Barrister
Joined
May 25, 2026
Messages
17

Case Filing​



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Orbb_1215
Plaintiff

v.

Superwoops
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

" I, Orbb_1215 on the 1st of September received about a dozen ominous messages from the server bot, saying that "new vaults were created" in the location of my apartment address by the defendant, Superwoops. Being a fairly new player to DC, I logged on and went home to investigate.

Upon entering my apartment, I saw it appeared as if it was ransacked and most of my chests and furnaces were missing. At the time it caused a lot of anxiety and grief for me, as I believed to have been robbed. Then I found out about the vaults system, and though my stuff was not permanently lost, it took time for me to reorganize my apartment, and recover from the invasion of privacy. I had also contacted DHS via a ticket on the DC server, however, they just explained the vaults system and said I may have been evicted.

However, no evidence of being evicted was present, as my name was still on my apartment's entrance, I could see via the /rl commands that I still was renting the apartment for 5 more days following the incident, and I had received no messages from the defendant informing me of my eviction, also I had received no notice from the defendant that he would be entering my apartment or making changes by destroying chests and furnaces therein."


I. PARTIES
1. Orbb_1215
2. Superwoops

II. FACTS
1. At the time of the robbery, roughly 10pm Eastern European Time on September 1, the defendant was leasing out an apartment to my client until at least September 5.
2. Multiple pieces of furniture belonging to my client were destroyed by the defendant
3. Several chests containing valuables belonging to my client were stolen and vaulted by the defendant
4. After this event, my client was still registered as being a tenant of the apartment, and was not evicted, nor was given any notice that they were being evicted.
5. These actions committed by the defendant were not a part of any judicial activity

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. By destroying my client's furniture, the defendant committed destruction of property, as is outlined in Section 7, subsection 1 of the Civil Code Act Act of Congress - Redmont Civil Code Act
2. By entering the apartment unannounced and destroying furniture and chests without my client's consent (therefore changing the property) the defendant committed landlord trespass, as outlined in Section 7, subsection 3 of the Civil Code Act Act of Congress - Redmont Civil Code Act

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Restitution of all property stolen or destroyed, roughly equaling 300 dollars
2. By stealing my client's property and griefing their home, the defendant caused Loss of Enjoyment and mental distress for my client, for which we seek $10,000
3. The payment of all legal fees

Evidence showing a discord bot sending notifications to my client that their items had been vaulted:
1788619436315.png
1788619452547.png

1788619469941.png


Screenshots of locations where furniture and chests were destroyed:

1788619515251.png

1788619538135.png
1788619558784.png


Evidence of tenant status:
1788619584501.png
1788619609948.png


Items stolen (images taken pre-theft):
1788619676818.png

1788619692373.png
1788619708299.png

Other items were stolen, but they are not significant enough to warrant showcase.

1788619834830.png


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This fifth day of September, 2026
 

Attachments

  • 1788619506863.png
    1788619506863.png
    22.7 KB · Views: 7
  • 1788619529648.png
    1788619529648.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 8
Last edited:
Areaous said:
I have notified my client
Click to expand...

Just a quick glance. It looks like the lease expired, Superwoops had rented it, vaulted all of the items and then destroyed the furniture on his property.

If anything I said isn't correct, let me know and I'll summon Superwoops.
 
Respectfully Your Honor that is incorrect. At the time of the occurrence my client still had several more days on the lease. Additionally the furniture and items belonged to my client

Under "evidence of Tenant Status" there is a screenshot taken from September 1 shortly after the occurrence, showing that my client still had 4 more days on the lease.

Signed, Desertstorm49, Barrister
 
Areaous said:
Respectfully Your Honor that is incorrect. At the time of the occurrence my client still had several more days on the lease. Additionally the furniture and items belonged to my client

Under "evidence of Tenant Status" there is a screenshot taken from September 1 shortly after the occurrence, showing that my client still had 4 more days on the lease.

Signed, Desertstorm49, Barrister
Click to expand...
And I would also like to add and point out to Your Honor that Superwoops was the landlord, not the one renting the building
 

Writ of Summons



@Superwoops is commanded to appear in the District Court in the case of Orbb_1215 v. Superwoops [2026] DCR 158


Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Muggy21 said:

Writ of Summons



@Superwoops is commanded to appear in the District Court in the case of Orbb_1215 v. Superwoops [2026] DCR 158


Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

Click to expand...
Present.
 

Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Uploaded evidence is not formatted correctly. Pursuant to Rule 4.6 of the Information - Court Rules and Procedures, the Defendant moves for all pieces of evidence to be struck.


Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

Areaous said:
destroying chests
Click to expand...
Areaous said:
Several chests containing valuables belonging to my client were stolen and vaulted by the defendant
Click to expand...
It is not possible for a chest to be destroyed, stolen and vaulted simultaneously. At least one of these must be false. Thanks to the improperly filed evidence, it is clear that the vaults are accessible by the Plaintiff; ergo, they were not stolen, nor destroyed. This matter need not wait until the conclusion of the trial, as pure logic prevents these three conditions from being simultaneously true. As such, Plaintiff's counsel has perjured themselves.

 

Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Plaintiff's counsel misidentifies the Defendant as SuperWoops.
The Defense would like the record to reflect the Defendant as Superwoops.


Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

The Complaint was amended roughly 20 minutes after the Presiding Officer's first message in this case thread. Rule 3.3 of the Information - Court Rules and Procedures requires all amendments to the Complaint be declared to the PO, which has not happened.

The Defense requests that the Court revert their edit history to the original post.

 
Apologies Your Honor. I accidentally hit enter while typing the post. Thus publishing it.
The edits I made to the post, which I am declaring now, were simply the completion of the post
 
Superwoops said:

Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Uploaded evidence is not formatted correctly. Pursuant to Rule 4.6 of the Information - Court Rules and Procedures, the Defendant moves for all pieces of evidence to be struck.


Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY


It is not possible for a chest to be destroyed, stolen and vaulted simultaneously. At least one of these must be false. Thanks to the improperly filed evidence, it is clear that the vaults are accessible by the Plaintiff; ergo, they were not stolen, nor destroyed. This matter need not wait until the conclusion of the trial, as pure logic prevents these three conditions from being simultaneously true. As such, Plaintiff's counsel has perjured themselves.

Click to expand...
The prosecution would like to clarify that:
-The items inside the chest were taken out without my client's permission
-The items were vaulted
-The empty chests were destroyed
The prosecution apologizes for any misunderstandings.
The prosecution would like to point out that even if the vaults were accessible to my client, they were still taken without consent or notice, however as this is a civil case we're not pressing charges for the theft of the items
 
Superwoops said:

Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

Uploaded evidence is not formatted correctly. Pursuant to Rule 4.6 of the Information - Court Rules and Procedures, the Defendant moves for all pieces of evidence to be struck.


Objection


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY


It is not possible for a chest to be destroyed, stolen and vaulted simultaneously. At least one of these must be false. Thanks to the improperly filed evidence, it is clear that the vaults are accessible by the Plaintiff; ergo, they were not stolen, nor destroyed. This matter need not wait until the conclusion of the trial, as pure logic prevents these three conditions from being simultaneously true. As such, Plaintiff's counsel has perjured themselves.

Click to expand...
I would like to informally inform Your Honor that I have seen this objection and I will move to correct my evidence. However, it is getting late in my timezone and I won't be able to fix the formatting until tomorrow. But I assure Your Honor that the evidence will be fixed within 21 hours at most
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top