Lawsuit: Dismissed HarryVInnit v. .Farmerkalechip and the Department of Justice

Status
Not open for further replies.
H

HarringtonV

Citizen
HarryVinnit
HarryVinnit
Barrister
Joined
Jul 7, 2026
Messages
2
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff
HarryVInnit

v.

.Farmerkalechip and the Department of JusticeDefendant

COMPLAINTThe Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF: The Plaintiff is filing this civil suit against Officer .Farmerkalechip and the Department of Justice for unlawful detainment without probable cause, negligence, and for the issuance of a strictly retaliatory fine meant to punish the Plaintiff for asserting their right to pursue civil litigation.

I. PARTIES

  1. HarryVInnit also known as Harry V (Plaintiff)
  2. .Farmerkalechip (Defendant - Police Officer)
  3. Department of Justice (Defendant - Government Entity)
II. FACTS

  1. On July 10, 2026, the Plaintiff was present within the premises of the Revhospital. Without prior warning, verbal communication, or stated probable cause, Officer .Farmerkalechip applied handcuffs to the Plaintiff, unlawfully detaining them.
  2. At the time of the incident, another player (ItzSkylessXD) was actively present in the hospital while utilizing a Creeper morph. Despite this player matching the profile of the alleged disruptive explosions, the responding officer ignored them and targeted the Plaintiff.
  3. While detained, the Plaintiff asked the officer, "why am i cuffed" and received no justification. Over the course of the detainment (approximately 20 minutes), Officer .Farmerkalechip engaged in erratic procedure, uncuffing and immediately re-cuffing the Plaintiff without providing any directives or reading them their charges.
  4. The Plaintiff was in possession of a cosmetic "TNT gadget" at the time of the incident. This server gadget is entirely harmless, incapable of causing player damage or destroying blocks, and is easily distinguishable from actual explosive contraband. The officer failed to verify the nature of this item before initiating the detainment.
  5. Frustrated by the unlawful detainment and lack of communication, the Plaintiff informed the officer of their intent to seek legal recourse, stating in local chat: "cuff me without saying anything ? yeah youre getting sued."
  6. In direct response to the Plaintiff's assertion of their legal rights, the officer utilized their policing powers to issue a retaliatory punishment. The Treasury immediately fined the Plaintiff $120.00, with the official citation listed as "threats."
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

  1. False Imprisonment / Unlawful Detainment and Negligence: Officer .Farmerkalechip detained the Plaintiff without stated probable cause and held them excessively without communication. If the officer's suspicion was based on the Plaintiff holding a TNT gadget, mistaking a harmless cosmetic item for an illegal explosive without conducting any questioning or basic investigation demonstrates severe negligence. Furthermore, the officer actively ignored a visually obvious suspect (a morphed Creeper) who perfectly matched the profile of the disruptive explosions.
  2. Abuse of Power / Rights Violation: Informing an officer of the intent to file a civil lawsuit through the established judicial system is a lawful notice, not a criminal act. Officer .Farmerkalechip abused their authority by twisting this lawful notice into a criminal "threat" to issue a retaliatory $120.00 fine.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEFThe Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

  1. A full reversal and refund of the $120.00 fine issued by the Treasury.
  2. $500 in compensatory damages for the 20 minutes of unlawful detainment and disruption of gameplay.
  3. $1,000 in punitive damages against Officer .Farmerkalechip for severe negligence, abuse of power, and utilizing government fines as a retaliatory tool to silence civil complaints.
  4. $250 to cover the legal fees associated with filing this case.
EVIDENCE:

  • Exhibit A (Detainment & "Threat" Context)
  • Exhibit B (Presence of Creeper Morph)
  • Exhibit C (Erratic Cuffing)
  • Exhibit D (Erratic Cuffing)
  • Exhibit E/F (Retaliatory Fine)
  • Exhibit B.pngExhibit C.pngExhibit D.pngExhibit E.pngExhibit F.pngExhibit A.png

Pictures may have gotten out of order and this entire ordeal went on for a lot longer than just I have screenshots for. The police officer was attempting to convince me it will just be thrown out the case and coerce me into not filing. It is unacceptable for a public servant to be acting in this type of way.
 

Court Order


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - STANDING

"Standing consists of three elements. First, the individual must have suffered an injury caused by a clearly identifiable second party or affected by an application of law. Second, the cause of the injury must be unlawful. Third, the injury must be capable of being remedied by a favorable decision under the relevant law" ([2025] SCR 19).

The Court is concerned the Plaintiff has failed to identify any legal authority for their Claims for Relief, and fails to identify any legal injury that is capable of being remedied by a favorable decision under relevant law.

The Plaintiff is ordered to address this concern within 48 hours.

 
Your Honour,

I feel the three elements have adequately been provided, as the Judge ruled in Toadking , injury does not necessarily have to be physical, a legal injury as stated prior, can result in needed remedy.

"A legal injury is any harm or wrong done to a person's rights, body, property, or reputation by someone else's fault. It is the foundation of civil lawsuits, allowing victims to seek financial compensation for their losses"

1. Injury Caused by a Clearly Identifiable Second Party: The Plaintiff suffered two distinct legal injuries caused by a clearly identifiable second party (Defendant .Farmerkalechip, acting as an agent of the Department of Justice):

  • A direct financial injury via the immediate removal of $120.00 from the Plaintiff's balance.
  • A loss of liberty and restriction of movement by being detained in handcuffs for approximately 20 minutes.

2. Unlawful Cause and Legal Authority: The cause of these injuries is unlawful under the established rights and statutes of the Commonwealth:

  • The Fine (Abuse of Power): The $120.00 fine was issued for "threats" solely because the Plaintiff stated an intent to pursue civil litigation ("youre getting sued"). Punishing a citizen for lawfully exercising their right to seek redress in the courts is an unlawful abuse of policing powers and violates the Plaintiff's basic rights to free expression and fair judicial access.
  • The Detainment (False Imprisonment): The Defendant held the Plaintiff without probable cause, without communication, and without establishing that a crime was physically possible with a harmless cosmetic gadget. This lack of due process constitutes over reaching and lack of training.
3. Capable of Being RemediedThese injuries are fully capable of being remedied by a favorable decision from this Court under relevant civil law. The Court possesses the legal authority to remedy the financial injury by ordering the Department of Justice to refund the $120.00 fine, and it can remedy the unlawful detainment by awarding the Plaintiff monetary damages.

Thank you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top