Lawsuit: Pending Sujal1048J v. YoroZy [2026] DCR 89

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Sujal1048J
Plaintiff

v.

YoroZy
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 12th of June at approximately 17:00, the Plaintiff, Sujal1048J, sent a message in chat looking to buy a car. The Defendant, YoroZy, responded saying he had one for sale for $1,200. The Defendant denied requests to show the car, and after the Plaintiff paid the requested amount, the Defendant gave him a paper, giving the location of the car. The Plaintiff found no car on the location, and the Defendant requested $400 more to build the car, and refusing to return the previous $1200.

I. PARTIES

1. Sujal1048J, Plaintiff
2. YoroZy, Defendant
3. MaxvEtten, legal representative for Plaintiff (Proof below)

II. FACTS

1. At 17:00 on June 12th, the Plaintiff sent a message in chat looking to buy a car.
2. The Defendant responded, saying he was selling one for $1,200.
3. The Plaintiff was looking to buy a car, to become a Deliveryman at a business called 'Redmont Express'.
4. The Plaintiff and Defendant met up near spawn, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to show the car, the Defendant refused, saying his boss' policy was to not take the car out of the chest before fully selling it.
5. The Plaintiff suggested to pay $600 first, then to recieve the car, and then pay $600 after. The Defendant agreed, and the Plaintiff then instantly paid the Defendant $600.
6. The Defendant refused to give the car, referring to his boss' policy once again. The Plaintiff then paid another $600, in total paying the full amount of $1,200.
7. The Defendant gave the Plaintiff the following: 5 Sticks, 1 Rabit Foot, 1 Paper Named 'Drinks Drgs Gambling! /directions start casino'. Claiming that the Plaintiff would recieve the vehicle from an individual at the location mentioned on the paper.
8. The Defendant previously claimed he had the car on him in a chest, which he now proves untrue.
9. The Defendant offered to go get it for $400, the Plaintiff refused the offer, and went to the location himself.
10. The Plaintiff arrived on the location, and noticed no one was there. A few minutes later the Defendant arrived, telling him he would charge $400 to build the car.
11. The Plaintiff got suspicious, and refused to pay an additional $400, on top of that he requested the $1,200 to be refunded, which the Defendant refused.
12. The Defendant's actions caused harm to the Plaintiff, and created a valid case for civil damages arising from criminal conduct.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF


Claim I: Theft
1. According to the Criminal Code Act, when a player takes property belonging to another without consent and intends to permanently deprive the owner of it, it falls under Theft.
2. While the Plaintiff did give consent by willingly paying the Defendant, the consent was induced by a false promise and therefore was not meaningful consent.
3. So the Defendant's conduct does satisfies this definition because the Defendant kept $1,200 after promising the Plaintiff the car and retained it despite the Plaintiff's request for its return.
4. Under Redmont law, crimes may be used to seek civil damages, and civil proceedings may proceed independently of any criminal prosecution.

Claim II: Compensatory Damages
1. The Plaintiff seeks Compensatory Damages, in the amount of $1,200 for the value of the stolen property.

Claim III: Nominal Damages arising from Theft
1. The Plaintiff seeks nominal damages because the Defendant's theft violated the Plaintiff's property rights beyond the direct financial loss suffered.
2. The Plaintiff seeks $2,500 in nominal damages. This amount is based on the severity of the Defendant's conduct. The Defendant intentionally and unlawfully stole property belonging to the Plaintiff without legal justification. The Defendant's actions deprived the Plaintiff of their lawful property and violated the Plaintiff's property rights. The requested sum is intended to compensate the Plaintiff for the loss suffered and to deter similar conduct in the future.

Claim IV: Consequential Damages
1. The Plaintiff applied for a job at 'Redmont Express' (Prior to the incident), where the weekly pay usually is around $140 / Week.
2. The Plaintiff intended to use the purchased vehicle to begin employment as a Delivery Man. Due to the Defendant's failure to deliver the vehicle, the Plaintiff was unable to pursue this employment opportunity and suffered lost earning potential. The Plaintiff seeks consequential damages in an amount to be determined by the Court.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $3,700 consisting of:
a. $1,200 in Compensatory Damages
b. $2,500 in Nominal Damages arising from Theft
2. Consequential Damages, in the ammount that the court finds just and proper.
3. Any applicable legal fees awarded to the prevailing party.
4. Any other relief the Court finds just and proper.

V. EVIDENCE

P-001: A screenshot, confirming the payments made to the Defendant by the Plaintiff.

P-002: A screenshot, confirming the Defendant telling the plaintiff going to a diffrent location to recieve the car, while he previously claimed he had it on him.


P-003: A screenshot, proving the Plaintiff's intention was to use the car for delivery services.




By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

Dated: This 12th day of June 2026