Lawsuit: Adjourned Volt Bank, Inc. v. .AstuteSundew823 [2025] FCR 119

Status
Not open for further replies.
ToadKing

ToadKing

Illegal Lawyer
Public Defender
Supporter
Aventura Resident
5th Anniversary Change Maker Popular in the Polls Statesman
ToadKing__
ToadKing__
Public Defender
Joined
Apr 4, 2025
Messages
245

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Volt Bank, Inc. (represented by ToadKing)
Plaintiff

v.

.AstuteSundew823 (Kakintus/Mikhail Kaukin)
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendants as follows:

The Defendant fraudulently obtained a $500,000 loan by concealing an existing mortgage on the collateral property, without the Plaintiff's consent or knowledge, in violation of a loan agreement, constituting Breach of Contract and Fraud.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES​

1. Volt Bank, Inc.
2. .AstuteSundew823 (aka Kakintus and Mikhail Kaukin)

​

II. FACTS​

1. On 2 November 2025, the Defendant executed a Mortgage Agreement with Pepecuu for $200,000. (P-001)
2. Under Section 2.1 of the Pepecuu Mortgage Agreement, the Defendant agreed that "upon successfully securing and completing the purchase of the real property located at Av-yachtclub, Aventura, Redmont... The Borrower shall grant Lender a THIRTY PERCENT (30%) fractional, first priority mortgage lien on The Property." (P-002)
3. By signing the Pepecuu agreement, the Defendant legally committed to encumber the property "av-yachtclub" with a 30% mortgage lien in favor of Pepecuu.
4. On 3 November 2025 at 14:35 GMT+1 (one day later), the Defendant executed a Loan Agreement with Volt Bank for a principal amount of $500,000. (P-003)
5. The Loan Agreement required the Defendant to pledge the property "av-yachtclub" as full collateral to secure repayment of the loan. (P-004)
6. The Defendant represented and warranted in Section 2.4 of the Loan Agreement that they were "the legitimate owner of the Collateral, free of any other liens or claims, and that no other party has rights to it." (P-005)
7. This representation was fraudulent. The Defendant had already contractually committed to granting Pepecuu a 30% first-priority mortgage lien on the same property one day earlier, and concealed this encumbrance from Volt Bank.
8. Section 3.1 of the Volt Loan Agreement defines as an Event of Default: "Unauthorized Transfer of Collateral: The Borrower sells, transfers, trades, leases, or lists for sale any of the Collateral (or any part of it) without the Lender's prior consent, or otherwise disposes of or encumbers the Collateral in any way before the loan is fully repaid." (P-006)
9. By signing the Pepecuu mortgage agreement before obtaining Volt's loan, the Defendant had already "encumbered the Collateral" without Volt's knowledge or consent.
10. Relying on the Defendant's fraudulent misrepresentations, Volt Bank disbursed $500,000 to the Defendant on 3 November 2025 at 21:04 GMT+1. (P-007)
11. The Defendant then used the combined loan proceeds from Volt Bank ($500,000) and Pepecuu ($200,000), plus approximately $100,000 of other funds, to purchase the property "av-yachtclub" from xSyncx for $800,000. (P-008)
12. The Defendant has failed to make any payments on the Volt loan and has defaulted on all obligations under the Loan Agreement.
13. The total amount owed under the Loan Agreement is $650,000 (principal of $500,000 plus $150,000 in total financing fees over the 3-month loan term). (P-009)

​

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF​

1. BREACH OF CONTRACT​

Section 7 of the Contracts Act states:
7 - Breach of Contract
(1) A breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations.
(a) Remedies for breach may include damages, specific performance, or other equitable relief.
Click to expand...
The Defendant breached the Loan Agreement under Section 7 by:
  1. Encumbering the collateral property with a 30% mortgage lien to Pepecuu without Volt's consent, constituting an Event of Default under Section 3.1
  2. Misrepresenting that the collateral was "free of any other liens or claims" when it was already encumbered
  3. Failing to make required monthly interest payments
  4. Failing to provide valid security interest in unencumbered collateral
Under Section 3.3 of the Loan Agreement, upon default, Volt Bank is entitled to accelerate the entire loan balance, seize collateral, and pursue legal remedies.

2. FRAUD​

The Defendant committed the criminal offence of Fraud under Part VII, Section 7 of the Criminal Code Act.
Part VII, Section 7 defines the offence of fraud as:
(a) knowingly or recklessly misrepresents or omits a material fact to another, causing the other party to rely on that misrepresentation, resulting in actual, quantifiable harm.
Click to expand...
The Defendant knowingly misrepresented and omitted a material fact to Volt Bank by falsely warranting that the collateral property "av-yachtclub" was "free of any other liens or claims" and concealing the existing 30% first-priority mortgage lien granted to Pepecuu one day earlier.

Volt Bank relied on this misrepresentation in extending $500,000 in credit, resulting in actual, quantifiable harm of at least $650,000 (the accelerated loan balance) when the Defendant defaulted and the collateral was revealed to be encumbered.

​

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF​

The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief:

1. A Court Order rescinding the purchase of "av-yachtclub" from xSyncx to the Defendant, requiring the property be returned to xSyncx, the $800,000 purchase price be returned, and the funds distributed as follows: $500,000 to Volt Bank, $200,000 to Pepecuu, and $100,000 back to the Defendant.

2. In the alternative, if rescission is not granted, a Court Order authorising Volt Bank to immediately seize and take ownership of the property "av-yachtclub" pursuant to Section 3.3 of the Loan Agreement.

3. $650,000 in Compensatory Damages ($500,000 principal plus $150,000 in financing fees) pursuant to Legal Damages Act Section 4.

4. $100,000 in Punitive Damages for the Defendant's outrageous fraudulent conduct in concealing existing encumbrances to fraudulently obtain $500,000, distributed: $50,000 to Volt Bank, $50,000 to Pepecuu; pursuant to Legal Damages Act Section 5.

5. $225,000 in Legal Fees representing 30% of this case's value.

​

EVIDENCE​

See MORTGAGE AGREEMENT (_.AstuteSundew823_).pdf
1762552383711.png
See Volt Loan Agreement (Kakingtus).pdf
1762552389628.png
1762552394792.png
1762552399514.png
1762552403596.png
1762552408052.png
1762552413384.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 7th day of November 2025



Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

The Plaintiff requests that this Court issue an emergency injunction to preserve assets and prevent irreparable harm.

The Defendant fraudulently obtained $500,000 by concealing an existing 30% encumbrance on collateral property when representing to Volt Bank that the property was "free of any other liens or claims." The Defendant used these fraudulently-obtained funds to purchase the property "av-yachtclub" for $800,000 and has now defaulted on all loan obligations.

Without immediate intervention, the Defendant can transfer, sell, encumber, or dissipate these assets, rendering any judgment uncollectible and depriving the Plaintiff of its contractual security interest and remedy of foreclosure. The funds and property at issue are liquid assets that can be moved or disposed of at any moment, and the Defendant has already demonstrated a pattern of fraudulent conduct and disregard for contractual obligations.

The Plaintiff, therefore, request that the Court immediately freeze and seize:

  1. The "av-yachtclub" plot, which serves as collateral under the Loan Agreement;
  2. All of the Defendant's bank accounts and financial assets;
  3. All other plots, properties, and real estate owned by Defendant; and
  4. All items, inventory, and personal property in Defendant's possession.
This emergency relief is necessary to preserve the status quo, protect Plaintiff's secured interest, and ensure the availability of assets to satisfy any judgment entered in this matter.



1762552375233.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
The Emergency Injunction is granted in full. Summons to follow shortly.
 
@ToadKing Are you able to provide the defendant's forum username?
 

Writ of Summons

@AstuteSundew823, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Volt Bank, Inc. v. .AstuteSundew823 [2025] FCR 119

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your Honour,
The Defendant has been permanently banned. Plaintiff requests default judgment on all prayers for relief.

1762678930577.png

 
Technofied said:
Your Honour,

May I pleasure the court.

The Defendant .AstuteSundew823 was the original account of player Abadoniss, who respectively is the alternative account of AstuteSundew823. ToadKing__ supplied said alternative account to the Defendant when the Defendant asked for said account.
Click to expand...
The Court is pleasured.

Just to clarify, ToadKing, who is representing the plaintiff, also supplied an alt account to the Defendant?
 
Your Pleasured Honor,

I would like to request a stay of default judgement of this case for 48 hours while I untangle the mess that this case has become.
 
Omegabiebel said:
Your Pleasured Honor,

I would like to request a stay of default judgement of this case for 48 hours while I untangle the mess that this case has become.
Click to expand...
Granted.

In addition, ToadKing is hereby dismissed from the case. I hereby refer this matter to the Department of Justice, and instruct them to look into the matter of ToadKing representing both plaintiff and defendant.
 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

As reported by staff, abadoniss is an alt of AstuteSundew. This complicates this case even more. AstuteSundew did a real estate transaction worth 86k with abadoniss essentially selling to himself which is a clear conflict of interest. This conflict of interest was not disclosed, even though per the contract this was required. Since abadoniss is AstuteSundew, the Defendant is in clear default.

The Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court that the court extends the earlier granted EI to abadoniss and immediately freeze and seize:

  1. All of abadoniss' bank accounts and financial assets;
  2. All other plots, properties, and real estate owned or transferred by abadoniss; and
  3. All items, inventory, and personal property in abadoniss' possession.

 

Attachments

  • P-010.png
    P-010.png
    142.5 KB · Views: 33
  • P-011.pdf
    P-011.pdf
    297.9 KB · Views: 37
Omegabiebel said:

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

As reported by staff, abadoniss is an alt of AstuteSundew. This complicates this case even more. AstuteSundew did a real estate transaction worth 86k with abadoniss essentially selling to himself which is a clear conflict of interest. This conflict of interest was not disclosed, even though per the contract this was required. Since abadoniss is AstuteSundew, the Defendant is in clear default.

The Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court that the court extends the earlier granted EI to abadoniss and immediately freeze and seize:

  1. All of abadoniss' bank accounts and financial assets;
  2. All other plots, properties, and real estate owned or transferred by abadoniss; and
  3. All items, inventory, and personal property in abadoniss' possession.

Click to expand...
Granted in full.
 
@Omegabiebel An interrogatory for plaintiff: Were you at any point made aware of your former counsel's dealings with .AstuteSundew823?
 
No.

I would like to note my objection to the phrasing "counsel's dealings". The situation is becoming more clear and earlier indications may be wrong.
 
Thank you. After conferring with my judicial colleagues, ToadKing is hereby found in Contempt of Court. I hereby fine him 50 penalty units (or $5,000), sentence him to 10 minutes imprisonment, and issue a Conduct Strike for his behavior.
 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Your Honor, I respectfully move this Court to reconsider its finding of Contempt of Court against my former counsel, ToadKing.

No evidence was presented to support these allegations, which warranted a charge of contempt. A criminal contempt conviction cannot rest on unproven accusations alone, and it requires actual evidence, which is entirely absent.

As the plaintiff in this matter, I approached ToadKing to represent me in this case precisely because he's good at what he does. I do not find ToadKing's behavior warranting a contempt charge. This action appears punitive. It borders on mixing staff action with legal consequences. Staff allegations about ToadKing's supposed involvement should not automatically translate into contempt findings without any evidence to support the claims.

It is my knowledge that ToadKing had no knowledge of the conduct of the Defendant and has consistently represented me in good faith. I respectfully request that this Court immediately vacate the contempt finding, cancel the $5,000 fine, void the 10-minute imprisonment sentence, and rescind the Conduct Strike.

 
Your Honor the timer of the stay has elapsed but I am happy to report that the relevant parties have come to an agreement. This will be sent shortly.
 
Your Honor,

The relevant parties(@xSyncx and @Pepecuu) have come to an agreement regarding this case. The av-yachtclub transaction will be reversed. This means that Volt Bank, Inc. will get 500k from xSyncx, Pepecuu will get 200k from xSyncx and the av-yachtclub plot will be returned to xSyncx. The 80k that is left will go to Volt Bank.

The Plaintiff requests that this agreement be affirmed with the verdict of this case.

A merge of another case:
The defendant also had a line of credit agreement with the Plaintiff, collateralized with plots bought from the withdrawals of this line of credit. Due to the strain on judicial resources and since the Defendant is permanently deported and therefore has no rights, the Plaintiff requests the case that would normally be separately filed for this default, be merged into this case and be included in this default judgement.

The intent of the agreement was that the Defendant would buy and sell plots to generate a profit, however due to the deportation this has now failed before any profit could be realised. A total of 291k was lent out. We request a court order transferring the collateral to the Plaintiff (plots C394-C397, c308, s112 and rh005).

A review of the collateral to valuator JediAJMan was requested about 11 hours before this case was filed, and before the defendant was known to be deported. It found that the total valuation of this collateral is between 145k and 165k. This Plaintiff would like to request that plot c655 worth between 65k and 70k (as valuated by JediAJMan) be transferred to the Plaintiff. This would not fully satisfy the outstanding debt. Therefore we request a court order transferring all assets from AstuteSundew823 and Abadoniss to Volt Bank, Inc. to hopefully satisfy this debt.
 

Attachments

  • p-012.png
    p-012.png
    23.7 KB · Views: 33
  • p-013.png
    p-013.png
    48.3 KB · Views: 31
  • p-014.png
    p-014.png
    45.9 KB · Views: 25
  • p-015.png
    p-015.png
    131.7 KB · Views: 33
  • p-016.pdf
    p-016.pdf
    297.9 KB · Views: 23

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECUSE

The plaintiff moves to recuse @AmityBlamity. They have just announced an 11 day LOA. In the interest of time the plaintiff requests this case to be assigned to a different Judicial Officer.

 
Omegabiebel said:

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECUSE

The plaintiff moves to recuse @AmityBlamity. They have just announced an 11 day LOA. In the interest of time the plaintiff requests this case to be assigned to a different Judicial Officer.

Click to expand...
Granted, whats pending?
 
Omegabiebel said:
Your Honor,

The relevant parties(@xSyncx and @Pepecuu) have come to an agreement regarding this case. The av-yachtclub transaction will be reversed. This means that Volt Bank, Inc. will get 500k from xSyncx, Pepecuu will get 200k from xSyncx and the av-yachtclub plot will be returned to xSyncx. The 80k that is left will go to Volt Bank.

The Plaintiff requests that this agreement be affirmed with the verdict of this case.

A merge of another case:
The defendant also had a line of credit agreement with the Plaintiff, collateralized with plots bought from the withdrawals of this line of credit. Due to the strain on judicial resources and since the Defendant is permanently deported and therefore has no rights, the Plaintiff requests the case that would normally be separately filed for this default, be merged into this case and be included in this default judgement.

The intent of the agreement was that the Defendant would buy and sell plots to generate a profit, however due to the deportation this has now failed before any profit could be realised. A total of 291k was lent out. We request a court order transferring the collateral to the Plaintiff (plots C394-C397, c308, s112 and rh005).

A review of the collateral to valuator JediAJMan was requested about 11 hours before this case was filed, and before the defendant was known to be deported. It found that the total valuation of this collateral is between 145k and 165k. This Plaintiff would like to request that plot c655 worth between 65k and 70k (as valuated by JediAJMan) be transferred to the Plaintiff. This would not fully satisfy the outstanding debt. Therefore we request a court order transferring all assets from AstuteSundew823 and Abadoniss to Volt Bank, Inc. to hopefully satisfy this debt.
Click to expand...
This still needs to be ruled on.

EDIT: The motion for reconsideration also still needs to be ruled on

Omegabiebel said:

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Your Honor, I respectfully move this Court to reconsider its finding of Contempt of Court against my former counsel, ToadKing.

No evidence was presented to support these allegations, which warranted a charge of contempt. A criminal contempt conviction cannot rest on unproven accusations alone, and it requires actual evidence, which is entirely absent.

As the plaintiff in this matter, I approached ToadKing to represent me in this case precisely because he's good at what he does. I do not find ToadKing's behavior warranting a contempt charge. This action appears punitive. It borders on mixing staff action with legal consequences. Staff allegations about ToadKing's supposed involvement should not automatically translate into contempt findings without any evidence to support the claims.

It is my knowledge that ToadKing had no knowledge of the conduct of the Defendant and has consistently represented me in good faith. I respectfully request that this Court immediately vacate the contempt finding, cancel the $5,000 fine, void the 10-minute imprisonment sentence, and rescind the Conduct Strike.

Click to expand...
 
Omegabiebel said:

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Your Honor, I respectfully move this Court to reconsider its finding of Contempt of Court against my former counsel, ToadKing.

No evidence was presented to support these allegations, which warranted a charge of contempt. A criminal contempt conviction cannot rest on unproven accusations alone, and it requires actual evidence, which is entirely absent.

As the plaintiff in this matter, I approached ToadKing to represent me in this case precisely because he's good at what he does. I do not find ToadKing's behavior warranting a contempt charge. This action appears punitive. It borders on mixing staff action with legal consequences. Staff allegations about ToadKing's supposed involvement should not automatically translate into contempt findings without any evidence to support the claims.

It is my knowledge that ToadKing had no knowledge of the conduct of the Defendant and has consistently represented me in good faith. I respectfully request that this Court immediately vacate the contempt finding, cancel the $5,000 fine, void the 10-minute imprisonment sentence, and rescind the Conduct Strike.

Click to expand...




The Court sees two issues.


1) In light of the conflict of interest between the Company’s former counsel and the Defendant, the Company does not posses a legitimate or lawful interest in defending ToadKing against the alleged contempt.

2) In his staff capacity, Lord Tuk (Owner Tech) is taken at his word. If Staff say the Defendant was an alt or somehow connected to ToadKing_, that is a given fact. This COI is highly improper and is deserving of a conduct strike.

That being said, Rule 1.4 requires warnings prior to adjudicating a Contempt of Court charge. The Contempt of Court is reversed. The Conduct Strike is voided, but will be maintained as a Warning in the Record.

The Court will refer ToadKing_'s conduct to the Attorney General for consideration for the following charges:
1) Legal Malpractice x1
2) Conflict of Interest x1
3) Duty to Disclose x1
 
Muggy21 said:
The Court sees two issues.


1) In light of the conflict of interest between the Company’s former counsel and the Defendant, the Company does not posses a legitimate or lawful interest in defending ToadKing against the alleged contempt.

2) In his staff capacity, Lord Tuk (Owner Tech) is taken at his word. If Staff say the Defendant was an alt or somehow connected to ToadKing_, that is a given fact. This COI is highly improper and is deserving of a conduct strike.

That being said, Rule 1.4 requires warnings prior to adjudicating a Contempt of Court charge. The Contempt of Court is reversed. The Conduct Strike is voided, but will be maintained as a Warning in the Record.

The Court will refer ToadKing_'s conduct to the Attorney General for consideration for the following charges:
1) Legal Malpractice x1
2) Conflict of Interest x1
3) Duty to Disclose x1
Click to expand...

The Supreme Court has ruled on this Contempt Charge. (see [2025] FCR 119 - Contempt of Court Charge - Appeal

Denied.
 

Verdict


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Verdict - Volt Bank, Inc. v. .AstuteSundew823 [2025] FCR 119


Summary of Controversy:

Plaintiff, Volt Bank, approaches the Court seeking damages for Breach of Contract and Fraud in the execution of a Mortgage Agreement. Defendant has fled the jurisdiction and is not heard.


Order of the Court:

The relevant parties(@xSyncx and @Pepecuu) have come to an agreement regarding this case. The av-yachtclub transaction will be reversed. This means that Volt Bank, Inc. will get 500k from xSyncx, Pepecuu will get 200k from xSyncx and the av-yachtclub plot will be returned to xSyncx. The 80k that is left will go to Volt Bank.

The Court actions the above settlement and adjudicates it as a verdict of this Court. For the purpose of calculations, the value of this case is $250,000.

Defendant shall pay onto Plaintiff $100,000 in punitive damages.
Defendant shall pay onto Plaintiff’s Counselor $25,000 in Legal Fees. The Court recognizes Omegabiebel as Volt Bank, Inc.’s counselor.

So ordered,
Judge Mug.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top