Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. urb5n [2025] FCR 83

Talion77

Chairman of NER
Justice Department
Construction & Transport Department
Health Department
Interior Department
Education Department
Oakridge Resident
Talion77
Talion77
State Prosecutor
Joined
Jun 3, 2025
Messages
73

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

urb5n
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

Recently, it was brought to the Commonwealth’s knowledge that urb5n conspired to exploit the wealth of new players for his own gain. This malicious act needs to be brought to justice.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont (represented by Talion77)
2. urb5n

II. FACTS

1. A few days prior to today, the Defendant stated the following in general-chat: „METALICU_S do /pay urb5n 1000 fr fr“. (P-001)

2. Shortly after that, the Defendant stated the following: „roxo_doxo you can continue if you do /pay urb5n 1215“. (P-001)

3. These statements both told new players to pay the Defendant their starter money, in case of roxo_doxo also additional money acquired by other means.

4. These statements can be used to mislead new players, exploiting their inexperience and wealth for unlawful gain.

5. The Criminal Code Act lists „Exploitation of New Players“ as an indictable offence with a penalty of up to 200 Penalty Units and up to 10 minutes imprisonment.

6. urb5n admits, in the context of a RBI investigation, to having told new players to send him their starter money. (P-002)

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:

1. Two counts of Conspiracy to commit Exploitation of New Players as per the Criminal Code Act. The Defendant tried to exploit the inexperience and wealth of METALICU_S and roxo_doxo for unlawful gain, by telling them to pay him 1000$ and 1215$ respectively. The new players have not carried out these actions to the knowledge of the Commonwealth, but the statements clearly show intent to the above. This is also supported by the admission of guilt.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:

1. A fine of 200 Penalty Units and 10 minutes of imprisonment on two counts of Conspiracy to commit Exploitation of New Players, as per the Criminal Code Act.

List of Witnesses:

1. urb5n (Defendant)
2. pricelessAgrari (RBI Investigator)

List of Evidence:

image.png

IMG_2900.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 13th day of August 2025

 
Last edited:

Writ of Summons


@urban is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case ofThe Commonwealth of Redmont v. urb5n [2025] FCR 83

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
how do i like appear in federal court i dont know shit about this
You made your appearance, you have 48 hours to provide an answer to complaint.

You have the option to request a Public Defender if you wish.
 
I wish JamesTheSlay to represent me in the Commonwealth of Redmont v. urb5n [2025] FCR 83
 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The new players in question, "METALIC_US", and "Roxo_Doxo", did not accept and further more this was an obvious Joke that if they did accept, which there is no evidence they did, was a mistake on the player.

 
Permission to respond, your honor.
 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The new players in question, "METALIC_US", and "Roxo_Doxo", did not accept and further more this was an obvious Joke that if they did accept, which there is no evidence they did, was a mistake on the player.

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE

By filing the motion to dismiss, defendant has violated Rule 5.1 of the Court Rules and Procedures, as he has not specified the rule which he wishes to file the motion under.

 
Your Honour,

The RCLU has an interest in criminal prosecutions in the Commonwealth. May we file an amicus curiae brief in regard to the defendant's constitutional rights?
 
Your Honour,

The RCLU has an interest in criminal prosecutions in the Commonwealth. May we file an amicus curiae brief in regard to the defendant's constitutional rights?
Your Honor, permission to respond.
 
Back
Top