Lawsuit: In Session Dodrio3 v. PurpleBG [2025] FCR 77

dodrio3

dodrio3

Citizen
Supporter
Aventura Resident
Grave Digger Change Maker Popular in the Polls Statesman
Dodrio3
Dodrio3
Attorney
Joined
May 15, 2021
Messages
329

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dodrio3
Plaintiff

v.

PurpleBG
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 27th of May 2025 2 Eviction reports were created against dodrio3 for plots S075 and S076. On the 30th of June 2025 an auction was started for both plots. On the 1st of July and 5th of July PurpleBG Placed the winning bids of $65,000 and $100,000 Respectively. On the 29th of July 2025 the DCT skipped past PurpleBG due to failure to pay resulting in the plots getting sold for $12,500 and $90,000 Respectively resulting in a loss of $62,500 for the plaintiff. When bidding in the real estate channel “All bids are legally binding and all bidders therefore are obligated to uphold their stated bid.” The defendant failed to uphold their stated bids which caused the plaintiff to lose money from the actions.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES
1. Dodrio3 - Plaintiff
2. PurpleBG - Defendant

II. FACTS
1. On the 27th of May 2025 2 Eviction reports were created against dodrio3 for plots S075 and S076
2. On the 30th of June 2025 an auction was started for plots S075 and S076
3. On the 1st of July PurpleBG placed the winning bid of $65,000 on S075
4. On the 5th of July PurpleBG placed the winning bid of $100,000 on S076
5. By placing a bid on the plots S075 and S076 PurpleBG place a legal biding bid they the are obligated to uphold
6. On the 29th of July PurpleBG failed to pay for S075 resulting in it being sold for $12,500 to Gribble19 at a loss of $52,500 to Dodrio3 [P-001,P-002]
7. On the 29th of July PurpleBG failed to pay for s076 resulting in it being sold for $90,00 to Brustklefurry
as a loss of $10,000 to Dodrio3

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. PurpleBG made a legal binding agreement to uphold their stated bid by failing to uphold this agreement the defendant cost $62,500 worth of losses to dodrio3.
2. PurpleBG inflicted emotional damages on dodrio3 at the perceived loss of $62,500.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $62,500 In compensatory damages for the loss that dodrio3 made on the plots by PurpleBG’s failed to uphold their legally binding agreement.
2. $25,000 In punitive damages for the outrageous action of PurpleBG failed to uphold a legal binding agreement that they entered.
3. $10,000 for the emotional harm caused to dodrio3
4. 30% of the value of the case in legal fees or a minimum of $2000 whichever is higher.

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 3rd day of August 2025

P-001
AD_4nXdbh0FOMyJhbkiPW55MhVc3YvOAY06hPnTSziK3xz57u5ENWvSd-yFmZ6n8hwELhwj5duLgxnkJlweQeIm9cJ3t5XLk3u8csDsQbVE7RxJd45TNx5JSPMBS9Zt7o983GiBsfLt7dQ
Click to expand...

P-002
AD_4nXcINPRYPWa7iTzEqLEvZ_QNR84k0wKz720a9qHIjS9lpOOwxdXX34OHtZgZXoeSEqSJRhLok2HKo9FDCRfZ3XCQYxCqWY45fH8MnsXsKvjxMhlEgVPGathi6-La211598etQ9MExA
Click to expand...

P-003
AD_4nXeZYT-plDUwzvIxYaOdsysSZ-ta3MvxN5LfgCQv4I58STsjVJelwZWeCRHAuDEXk-UkcmzW0hDpX3IXGaKXkQ2MtuUWfLGekgqLtBtyUprmbmIaPJKZGRv8QMff4nOBDLGlVYR0Wg
Click to expand...

P-004
AD_4nXckPgNdOhGWHQrX1bT3Ov5xWBygvhteZe0h0oIvUoISBr_pdM9u_FSlBs-ArkewfRdsW2FIxWrywy1Zap5yjbb47R59SX6Uv1j5gLRWW8QzMZ0xLVd_AzlgcGm-w07tgxdzcbEZYg
Click to expand...

 
Your Honor,

Agrari Talion & Partners Will be Representing PurpleBG
Due to our right to a speedy trial we would like to get the summons Immediately so we can get this matter dismissed
Screen Shot 2025-08-03 at 1.34.42 PM.png
 

Writ of Summons


@PurpleBG is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Dodrio3 v. PurpleBG [2025] FCR 77

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
KingBOB99878 said:
Your Honor,

Agrari Talion & Partners Will be Representing PurpleBG
Due to our right to a speedy trial we would like to get the summons Immediately so we can get this matter dismissed
View attachment 58968
Click to expand...
I will say this is a warning for speaking when not yet summoned. That being said it appears you are already here and as such have 48 hours to submit your answer to the complaint.
 
Im here too if needed ?
 
Ultrapvpnoob will be representing me in this matter
 

Motion



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

DODRIO3
Plaintiff

v.

PURPLEBG
Defendant
(Represented by Agrari, Talion & Partners)


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The Defendant, PurpleBG, respectfully moves this Court to dismiss the Plaintiff's complaint on the following grounds:

1. PurpleBG asserts no wrongdoing has occurred on their part in relation to the claims presented by Dodrio3.
2. The alleged issues or damages cited by the Plaintiff are the result of actions undertaken solely by the Department of Construction & Transport (DCT), an independent governmental entity.
3. PurpleBG had neither control over nor responsibility for the decisions or actions made by DCT that led to the Plaintiff's alleged grievances.
4. As the claims properly fall within the jurisdiction and accountability of the DCT, PurpleBG is incorrectly named as a defendant in this case.

Therefore, PurpleBG requests that this Court:

* Dismiss the complaint entirely with respect to PurpleBG.
* Direct the Plaintiff, should they wish to pursue this matter further, to address their claims to the appropriate party, namely the Department of Construction & Transport.

DATED: This 3rd day of August, 2025.

Respectfully submitted,
KingBOB99878
Represented by Agrari, Talion & Partners

 
ameslap said:
I will say this is a warning for speaking when not yet summoned. That being said it appears you are already here and as such have 48 hours to submit your answer to the complaint.
Click to expand...
Your Honnur the defence has failed to provide answer to Complaint. May I request the Defendant be ordered to write one so the Plaintiff may respond to any points they make in our opening statement.
 
Your Honor,
The Defence is sorry we were focused on waiting for a response by you on the Motion we Will post in a few minutes
 

Answer to Complaint


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

DODRIO3
Plaintiff

v.

PURPLEBG
Defendant
(Represented by Agrari, Talion & Partners)

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Defendant, PurpleBG, denies all allegations made by the Plaintiff, Dodrio3, that suggest wrongdoing or liability.

Defendant denies causing any harm or damages alleged by the Plaintiff.

Defendant asserts no responsibility for the actions or decisions referenced in the complaint, as these were made solely by the Department of Construction & Transport (DCT).
Defendant, PurpleBG, denies this caused emotional harm.

Defendant, Denies he broke any law as it shows in D-001 that DCT Sec. xEndeavour said he could pay or not

II. DEFENCES
No Liability: The Defendant asserts they had no control over the actions taken by the DCT, which are the direct cause of any alleged harm.

Improper Party: The Defendant maintains that the Plaintiff's grievances should be directed at DCT as the proper responsible party.

Compliance with Law: At all relevant times, PurpleBG acted lawfully, without violation of DemocracyCraft law or regulations.

Lack of Cause of Action: Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a legally valid claim against PurpleBG, as Defendant has committed no act causing the harm or damages alleged by Plaintiff.





Evidence

1754595785748.png
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 3rd day of August, 2025.

Respectfully submitted,
KingBOB99878
Represented by Agrari, Talion & Partners

 
I will rule in the motion to dismiss tomorrow morning, I’m on a little road trip so my internet connection is hit or miss.

In the meantime discovery is now open and will last 5 days. It may end early if both parties agree.
 
I apologize for the late response to motion, but the motion still has not been ruled on so I assume that I am allowed to respond to it:

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS

When a bet is placed on an auction, a legally binding contract is formed. By winning the auction and refusing to pay you have committed a breach of contract, which is suitable grounds for damages. The DCT did not force PurpleBG to not fulfill their contract, they chose to not fulfill it on their own, and hence they are responsible for all damages caused by their breach of contract
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top