Lawsuit: Pending pricelessAgrari v. MysticPhunky [2025] DCR 48

P

pricelessAgrari

Citizen
Homeland Security Department
Justice Department
Education Department
Aventura Resident
5th Anniversary
pricelessAgrari
pricelessAgrari
Police Officer
Joined
Mar 17, 2025
Messages
44

Case Filing​


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


pricelessAgrari
Plaintiff

v.

MysticPhunky
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On the twelfth of July, 2025, I arrested MysticPhunky for 1x murder. He claimed he had a ticket open, but it was closed. I had a reasonable belief to continue with my arrest lawfully because tickets are only closed if they have been reviewed and the DHS has reached a verdict on it. After this, he mocked me twice on asking 'priceless are you even a trained doctor btw' in Global and 'priceless are you even trained' in DoH chat. He also claimed that 'priceless just threatened me on discord' in International chat. I believe this is a clear-cut case of defamation, as it may potentially damage my reputation.

I. PARTIES
1. pricelessAgrari
2. MysticPhunky

II. FACTS
1. I cuffed MysticPhunky due to him having a wanted record.
2. He claimed to have a dispute ticket.
3. I asked for the ID of the ticket, and he said it was closed.
4. He later admitted that he never opened a ticket to dispute the record.
5. I treated a patient later, and MysticPhunky said 'priceless are you even trained' in DoH chat
6. A while later, MysticPhunky said in Global 'priceless are you even a trained doctor btw'
7. I messaged him on Discord, telling him 'I will let you have one chance to take back everything you said or I will sue you'
8. He said in International chat 'priceless just threatened me on discord'

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Humiliation is defined in §7.a(I) of the Legal Damages Act as “Situations in which a person has been disgraced, belittled or made to look foolish."
It is reasonable to assume that anyone who has to listen to the statements would be disgraced and embarrassed, especially when you are trying to do your job, as a police officer and a doctor.

2. Slander is defined in §4.a No More Defamation Act as "A false statement, usually made through either discord or in-game messages, which defames another person’s reputation, business, profession, or organization."
The statements made by the defendant clearly discredit my profession as a doctor, as though I am being called unfit for my role.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $12,000 in punitive damages for the slanderous statements made against the plaintiff.
2. $5,000 in consequential damages for the humiliation suffered by the Plaintiff due to the statements made by the Defendant.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 13th day of July 2025
 

Attachments

  • 2025-07-12_22.58.15.PNG
    2025-07-12_22.58.15.PNG
    36 KB · Views: 19
  • 2025-07-12_22.51.33.PNG
    2025-07-12_22.51.33.PNG
    43.8 KB · Views: 18
  • 2025-07-12_22.51.30.PNG
    2025-07-12_22.51.30.PNG
    21.9 KB · Views: 17

Writ of Summons


@MysticPhunky is required to appear before the District Court of Redmont in the case of pricelessAgrari v. MysticPhunky [2025] DCR 48

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
The defense is present your honor. Justita Legal Group will be representing.
 
Your Honor,
The image of the agreement by the Defendant to be represented by Justita Legal Group can be found below.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2025-07-14_093256.png
    Screenshot_2025-07-14_093256.png
    24.3 KB · Views: 11
POOLNOODLE said:
Your Honor,
The image of the agreement by the Defendant to be represented by Justita Legal Group can be found below.
Click to expand...
Thank you. You have 48 hours to provide an Answer to Complaint.
 

Case Filing​


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


pricelessAgrari
Plaintiff

v.

MysticPhunky
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. Defendant admits that Plaintiff arrested them on July 12, 2025, for 1x murder but denies that the arrest was lawful or properly verified as it is a Violation of Section 32(14) of the Constitution which states that "Every citizen has the right to life, liberty, and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice."
2. Defendant admits stating that they had a dispute ticket open, but asserts that the ticket was under review or being prepared, and denies any intent to deceive.
3. Defendant denies that their comments in chat were defamatory, and asserts that said comments were expressions of frustration and opinion, not false factual statements.
4. Defendant admits to stating “priceless just threatened me on Discord” in International chat, but asserts that the statement was true and based on the Plaintiff’s own message threatening legal action unless Defendant retracted their public comments.
5. Defendant denies that the Plaintiff has suffered any legal damages and denies all allegations of slander or humiliation that rise to the standard set under Redmont law.


II. COUNTERCLAIM FOR FALSE ARREST & EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
Defendant (Counterclaimant) MysticPhunky brings the following Counterclaim:
A. Parties
Counterclaimant: MysticPhunky

Counter-Defendant: pricelessAgrari

B. Facts
1) On July 12, 2025, the Counter-Defendant arrested Counterclaimant for a murder charge.
2) The arrest was conducted despite the Counterclaimant raising a dispute over the record, which was either pending or misunderstood.
3) Counter-Defendant failed to verify the ticket’s status or check with relevant authorities before proceeding.
4) The arrest was made without proper cause or procedure, constituting false arrest.
5) Following the incident, Counter-Defendant issued a coercive Discord message:
6) “I will let you have one chance to take back everything you said or I will sue you.”
7) Counterclaimant publicly referenced this message, triggering this retaliatory lawsuit.
8) As a result of the arrest and ongoing legal harassment, Counterclaimant suffered stress, embarrassment, and public backlash.


C. Claims for Relief
-False Arrest

-Emotional Distress

-Abuse of Legal Process


III. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Defendant respectfully requests that the Court:
1) Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Complaint in full;
2) Award the Defendant:
$10,000 for false arrest;
$5,000 for emotional distress;
3) Declare that the Plaintiff’s use of the legal system was retaliatory and improper;
4) $500 in compensatory damages under Standardized Criminal Code Act §4(2)(c), which entitles the Plaintiff to $50 per minute spent in prison falsely.
5) Grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
6) Legal fees: 20% of case value.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 14th day of July 2025
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    17.8 KB · Views: 9
  • image.png
    image.png
    10.4 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
We will now enter discovery. Discovery shall last 5 days, unless both parties consent to ending it early.
 
Ediyto1 said:

Case Filing​


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


pricelessAgrari
Plaintiff

v.

MysticPhunky
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. Defendant admits that Plaintiff arrested them on July 12, 2025, for 1x murder but denies that the arrest was lawful or properly verified as it is a Violation of Section 32(14) of the Constitution which states that "Every citizen has the right to life, liberty, and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice."
2. Defendant admits stating that they had a dispute ticket open, but asserts that the ticket was under review or being prepared, and denies any intent to deceive.
3. Defendant denies that their comments in chat were defamatory, and asserts that said comments were expressions of frustration and opinion, not false factual statements.
4. Defendant admits to stating “priceless just threatened me on Discord” in International chat, but asserts that the statement was true and based on the Plaintiff’s own message threatening legal action unless Defendant retracted their public comments.
5. Defendant denies that the Plaintiff has suffered any legal damages and denies all allegations of slander or humiliation that rise to the standard set under Redmont law.


II. COUNTERCLAIM FOR FALSE ARREST & EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
Defendant (Counterclaimant) MysticPhunky brings the following Counterclaim:
A. Parties
Counterclaimant: MysticPhunky

Counter-Defendant: pricelessAgrari

B. Facts
1) On July 12, 2025, the Counter-Defendant arrested Counterclaimant for a murder charge.
2) The arrest was conducted despite the Counterclaimant raising a dispute over the record, which was either pending or misunderstood.
3) Counter-Defendant failed to verify the ticket’s status or check with relevant authorities before proceeding.
4) The arrest was made without proper cause or procedure, constituting false arrest.
5) Following the incident, Counter-Defendant issued a coercive Discord message:
6) “I will let you have one chance to take back everything you said or I will sue you.”
7) Counterclaimant publicly referenced this message, triggering this retaliatory lawsuit.
8) As a result of the arrest and ongoing legal harassment, Counterclaimant suffered stress, embarrassment, and public backlash.


C. Claims for Relief
-False Arrest

-Emotional Distress

-Abuse of Legal Process


III. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Defendant respectfully requests that the Court:
1) Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Complaint in full;
2) Award the Defendant:
$10,000 for false arrest;
$5,000 for emotional distress;
3) Declare that the Plaintiff’s use of the legal system was retaliatory and improper;
4) $500 in compensatory damages under Standardized Criminal Code Act §4(2)(c), which entitles the Plaintiff to $50 per minute spent in prison falsely.
5) Grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
6) Legal fees: 20% of case value.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 14th day of July 2025
Click to expand...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The plaintiff moves to dismiss the countersuit under Rule 5.11 (Immunity Protection), and in support therefore respectfully alleges:

1. The defendant has filed a countersuit for a false arrest by the plaintiff, an official law enforcement officer of the Commonwealth of Redmont.

2. During all points of the arrest and afterwards, I was acting within my official scope of duties with a warrant record (probable cause).

3. Rule 5.11 states, "A Motion to Dismiss may be submitted if the defendant is statutorily or constitutionally immune from being sued."

4. Considering I was within my official scope of duties and committing an arrest with probable cause, I am constitutionally immune from being sued directly. Instead, the defendant should take it up with the Commonwealth of Redmont.
 
pricelessAgrari said:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The plaintiff moves to dismiss the countersuit under Rule 5.11 (Immunity Protection), and in support therefore respectfully alleges:

1. The defendant has filed a countersuit for a false arrest by the plaintiff, an official law enforcement officer of the Commonwealth of Redmont.

2. During all points of the arrest and afterwards, I was acting within my official scope of duties with a warrant record (probable cause).

3. Rule 5.11 states, "A Motion to Dismiss may be submitted if the defendant is statutorily or constitutionally immune from being sued."

4. Considering I was within my official scope of duties and committing an arrest with probable cause, I am constitutionally immune from being sued directly. Instead, the defendant should take it up with the Commonwealth of Redmont.
Click to expand...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

MysticPhunky, Defendant/Counterclaimant
v.
pricelessAgrari, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS.

Defendant MysticPhunky respectfully opposes Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaim under Rule 5.11 and states the following:

1. While the Plaintiff acted under color of law as a law enforcement officer, their arrest was conducted without proper verification of a dispute ticket, despite being informed of its existence.

2. Immunity under Rule 5.11 does not shield officers who act outside the bounds of reasonable and standard procedure, or whose actions amount to retaliation or procedural misconduct.

3. Defendant contends that the arrest was not made in good faith and resulted in humiliation, reputational harm, and stress, especially given that the Plaintiff later used the incident to initiate a retaliatory lawsuit.

4. The Counterclaim stands not only as a challenge to the Plaintiff’s conduct, but also raises questions of systemic failure, and Defendant is willing to amend the filing to include the Commonwealth of Redmont if necessary.

Wherefore, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court deny the Motion to Dismiss, or alternatively grant leave to amend the Counterclaim to include the proper liable party if deemed appropriate under Rule 5.11.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top