Lawsuit: Adjourned snow_crp v. FearlessNacktmul [2025] DCR 33

Status
Not open for further replies.
JunkCereal

JunkCereal

Citizen
5th Anniversary
Joined
Mar 24, 2025
Messages
4

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

snow_crp (Represented by Dragon Law Firm)
Plaintiff

v.

FearlessNacktmul
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On the 12th of April 2025, FearlessNacktmul began to insult snow_crp. In the middle of FearlessNacktmul's barrage of insults, his outrageous behavior culminated in threatening snow_crp to "fistfight [him] irl…" During this harassment, snow_crp became distressed and could not engage with and enjoy Redmont the way he had before FearlessNacktmul's actions.

I. PARTIES
1. snow_crp
2. FearlessNacktmul

II. FACTS
1. On the 12th of April, the Defendant insulted the Plaintiff. See P-001 through P-007.
2. This behavior culminated in the Defendant threatening the Plaintiff to “fistfight [him] irl…” See P-008 and P-009.
3. Defendant was later deported through Staff action. See P-010 and P-011.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant’s actions violated the law. The Violent Offences Act § 5 (5) states:

“The act of disorderly behavior towards an individual or a group of individuals, that may be deemed to a reasonable person as causing harassment, alarm, or distress.”
Click to expand...
Any reasonable person would deem the Defendant’s actions caused “harassment, alarm or distress.” This claim is further supported by Staff’s decision to deport the Defendant.

2. The Defendant’s actions were outrageous. See P-001. The Defendant has a history of being disruptive and is openly proud of that fact. See P-013 and P-012.

3. The Defendant’s actions resulted in Loss of Enjoyment of Redmont for the Plaintiff. The Legal Damages Act § 7 (1)(a)(III) states:
“The Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont - Situations in which an injured party loses, or has diminished, their ability to engage in certain activities in the way that the injured party did before the harm. Loss of enjoyment in Redmont damages may be proven by witness testimony and reasonable person tests, or any other mechanism the presiding judicial officer considers persuasive.”
Click to expand...
The Defendant’s outrageous behavior clearly diminished the Plaintiff’s ability to engage with Redmont. Any reasonable person would say it’s difficult to engage in a community where they’re constantly being insulted and harassed by another individual, lowering the enjoyability of the server.

IV. PRAYERS FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $3,750 in punitive damages due to the outrageous actions of the Defendant.
2. $4,500 in consequential damages due to a Loss of Enjoyment of Redmont.
3. $6,000 in legal fees, the minimum set by the Legal Damages Act.

V. EVIDENCE
AD_4nXc4c7KET8eq30wIJGMXJOKAmzBy7YjZPdsrS_wC4M19xto_2V7Sj5xDM8aYQIoC9XCz6JxAletxHilAj78wHBnY9KC8vJbnJgxS5vCiMwJmvrv8PZsU-6BeOw-MTeWm6IuTo2TM
AD_4nXchyLuYpRipK107acsL8Gj4vm54cM4PLBHw1P2ZRzk6T7_czrBSVPP15qIsbbK2USoBZPbxSG5vH3nvwI9taDR7kzF5uPHJLv19DxfjHZ66hEMHGxukSI4V6wtri9STc4LRbtQvnA
AD_4nXcIvhiJVRuixUpGKO_3JiEkbn8QqvWLmKf4iiFnk4mI7mo2E-zTlbCNPcrlzIp0zkK8byPfsZxRWoNCsbHmB4vGdnsQFjem5d4xnMbL_vJnPH_lyUhVFo166glAedxpQ_az4-IQzQ
AD_4nXeA0az0TRuaV1WVHdxkb48a9ml5M_lpE74EVQ_Dd5EK__in8A_Yuv-_CWfntLq2zqI4soXILkIJENNKILIzvSndAJp-qv45zRGFts4XNyFxJdEzPW_8drpwtSLCL42fyGeJuOGJmw
AD_4nXfOWTwHlydz4rA9k7070IPIYEoEP1JNSDCwz8SEklDNvzPhWxSEycPkjoKogGEKXikINEHHhTvPQA0-EHuTcpNhMD6QxarGzGrHhiqr4stqPat0HxfY_JvrlvjFdQzrt8vH__48Pg
AD_4nXelfEI7UpFI3PUeWWIl0G3LWsz0HNUdnb608O0qSMT54dkOuk0J-PSHk-rOFifnX3l4E7myBczthEVPLh_bfz5cBksrWowSjUcFkZ3lKuPVqfZ9mhE_2WEoHfw72z0GgOJgsGOqIg
AD_4nXe-Fdk-L9pqUsoynPLdmjL2Rr3DcyjvSJoAWJpyhpRRq24Bdcrxc-1jasSP2x4t2DJB01IuSabZg0t0VLOKioSYQzOrYJSrEvwCF20trfSXdE99IzxR1I_eblocaFFbfGy1FhOdsA
008.png
AD_4nXdp7ZCAvBVTPruO9JQV1Rwu3Ki6kBXjq9naIIIOWadH6LnyyEJIC6APlUR_6NO6qIJ4e_ov8Zh3S1JxzQxZy6dLBiRJqjkahaMqwH9KwUNCfywjQYzSX1ojevoDIuCAOiMbvA3KgQ
AD_4nXdhzyc_UyfxUz0NP_8g2n6ezQ63N3M8lIW06mtYTGsnGEnGgr-A-Cuy3Zn12ybkK2KmREr_cWrZjP9Q-r4ht-Bpxyso6lX4oskkIsUb8LBcJYGeCXIxN5Z5w0b4yNKWp5oLVRaaNg
AD_4nXe9r3r3zZDBzL2kg4Sqdw51sJRjuON1CHTgU03XqWnlEpWpIb5DQsXDXblPF4RGTWYnDQ51QmgWireA0gXnBcoLb00_IrS4aGrMbwGTkqS0l0Lkft-l9x5ExAwsxrYcqHcwjqWC
AD_4nXfQ42MX6fTmYNhtQAyszkK9ObqyxoVh6n10uVKuh6oZcvNaJmtHj2mvSc3oHQALNSxjn912HwNeJNoniLS7cNt6hqn0vZrKLSOqx57Ho0JtgIFJJQeaI0gAKzCz-w9h0b3dHPsqWQ
AD_4nXfKLfm2-SNd2C1NGoB8IPsfpAp_w7UA4BHBr64-7qHmw7xAAdiIIgdpo8p4zCiVmHUChUz4Vbi7I12BDYY-OjTsWQxvt0OgmEN0v-Y3eaL04YCkOurqOLiUhyESo6-ea8dz2e_fSA

VI. PROOF OF REPRESENTATION
AD_4nXcp5QJeEdkqkBp2cNsCUYbm8rqYPZdtVsCCSLLzS72vXeAt9hy1oWdTlGhnsVZG7jjddOpk-ONTlq-TnnL827bK_MNjKVD95qiQ8HdnXgOpskUcIz0FHGDb8yR7HqaEzP9HbClc4w

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 16th day of April, 2025.

 

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Your honor, as mentioned in the complaint, the Defendant has been deported. It was established in UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2 that deported players - even temporarily deported players - don’t have rights. In the spirit of quickly seeking justice for the very crime the Defendant was deported for, the Plaintiff respectfully moves for summary judgment.

 
Last edited:
JunkCereal said:

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Your honor, as mentioned in the complaint, the Defendant has been deported. It was established in UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2 that deported players - even temporarily deported players - don’t have rights. In the spirit of quickly seeking justice for the very crime the Defendant was deported for, the Plaintiff respectfully moves for summary judgment.

Click to expand...
Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted

Case is in recess pending verdict.
 

Verdict


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
snow_crp v. fearlessnacktmul [2025] DCR 33.

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The plaintiff was verbally harassed by the defendant
2. This harassment caused the plaintiff to both feel distressed and suffer loss of enjoyment in Redmont.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. The defendant is deported and therefore has no right to representation

III. THE COURT OPINION
The plaintiff very clearly as shown by the evidence seems to have been verbally harassed by the defendant and since there was no right to representation or a defense afforded to the defendant as they are deported the court has almost no choice but to find in favor of the plaintiff. The court will examine the requested prayers of relief.

As for loss of Enjoyment in Redmont the court will not grant any damages. The action must have according to its definition "an injured party loses, or has diminished, their ability to engage in certain activities in the way that the injured party did before the harm" and the court does not see how this in anyway hindered the plaintiffs ability to do anything. While yes it isn't fun to be verbally berated, it didn't directly impact or prevent any gameplay. There is also the existence of /ignore in which removes this problem entirely.

As for punitive damages for outrageous behavior the court will grant damages. While /ignore does exist for situations like this, the comments against the plaintiff are mostly being made publicly for all to see which can't be avoided. The comments themselves along with the public nature of them is what leads the court to rule this as outrageous behavior.

IV. DECISION
The District Court rules in favor of the Plaintiff with a modified prayer of relief.

The DHS is ordered to fine fearlessnacktmul $9,500 and unfine snow_crp $3500 for punitive damages and JunkCereal $6,000 for legal fees.


The District Court thanks all involved.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top