Search results

GO KO

I require a sidebar for this. Both parties please join the Judiciary Discord as soon as possible and make myself aware that you are there.

I am not one to hide from my mistakes, and it appears I have made one when it came to make new-found understanding of perjury. I will be striking my previous perjury ruling and approve the reconsideration. I will be making a new ruling on the perjury objection here soon. I apologize for my...

After conferring with the judiciary, it appears I was mistaken and I apologize. I will be striking my previous ruling on "Perjury, Perjury, Perjury" and will be re-ruling.

I have not forgotten about this, I am doing some further research and will make a ruling shortly. This motion is approved. The Defense may still object to any of the requested evidence but it is understood that they must submit the evidence within the next 48 hours. Granted. Discovery will...

Discovery will now officially start and last for 5 days. Discovery may end early if both parties agrees; Please let the court know if you would like an in-game trial by the end of discovery.

Thank you! The Plaintiff has around 31 hours to submit any requests for additional evidence.

The motion is hereby denied, as End in this instance was responding as a staff member. Furthermore, this situation has been dealt with internally and is resolved.

Denied. Only the DoJ can charge and prosecute people with perjury per the Criminal Code Act.

Is this owner end talking or DCT Secretary End talking?

All, it has come to the attention to the Judiciary that Perjury is now an indictment that can only be prosecuted by the DoJ. As such, my warnings for it no longer apply, but this still applies to the Contempt of Court warnings.

Denied. Perjury is now an indictment and not a summary act under the Criminal Code Act and as such only the DoJ may prosecute it.

Motion is approved. This is a final warning that any more issues shall be considered perjury and/or contempt of court and will be handled as such. I am only giving grace in this instance because you worked to remedy the action, but this will not be given the same grace going forward.

As this is not the only time for lapses in this case and the Plaintiff has been warned in the past, I will be charging you with Perjury and sentencing you to a fine of $10,000 with no jail time as you are actively working to correct this. Your motion to amend is accepted. Please edit your...

An answer stating that the information you seek is in evidence, at least in this case, is satisfactory to me. That being said, I have reviewed the evidence provided by the Plaintiffs in the complaint that is the eviction reports. It is my opinion that the answers given in the reports are...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISMISSAL Dearev & GlobalCenter Corporation v. Voyager Group - [2025] FCR 74 Civil Action I will be dismissing this case for Sua Sponte (rule 2.2). There are a couple of points that I feel are important to cover in this dismissal: I. Standing...

The Emergency Injunction is hereby granted in part. All of Voyager's assets are to be frozen and the DoC may not liquidate them until the Government is given a chance to respond to the EI and a final ruling is made.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT COURT ORDER I am charging @End with a new count of Contempt of Court for self-removing the wanted point to avoid jail time from the first Contempt Charge. The DHS is to fine End $5,000 and jail them for 10 minutes for this new charge, and...

@gribble19 is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Dearev & GlobalCenter Corporation v. Voyager Group [2025] FCR 74.

@dearev please provide who the ping for summons should go to for Voyager Group. Scratch that, no need to provide.