Search results

I would like to request a 24 hour extension. Father’s Day weekend is here (if you know you know).

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your honor, this may be the most open and shut case in all of Redmontian legal history. The Defendant hoped to turn the tide of an election. On three separate occasions, the Accused posted publicly and as an ad “Vote Zlost...

Your honor, we are ready to end discovery if the defendant is.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honor, opposing counsel has argued that because the term "answer" and "plea" are different then the rules do not apply. Firstly, this is a dangerous precedent to set as there is no distinction in any place on when to...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEEDURE Rule 3.2 states: All answers, even Small Claims, must use the appropriate “Creating a Lawsuit” format and must have: An affirmation of what facts are affirmed, denied, or non contested. Either defenses under...

Your honor, we have reached a plea deal. The Defendant will plead guilty and in exchange will be fined $18,000 and have a 2 month bar on all public offices.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CRIMINAL ACTION The Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. IamJeb_ Defendant COMPLAINT The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: Even when deported, the Mafia holds a firm grip on the citizens of...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your honor, the Defendant engaged in violations of the Commercial Standards Act regarding Sections 15, 6, and 8. The evidence and witness testimony has pointed to this time and time again. Now, in the Answer to the Complaint...

Your honor, may I have an additional 10 hours? The past few days IRL have been extremely busy/difficult.

No further questions. Thank you for your time!

Can bidders see the items in the mystery box before bidding?

So is it possible that the Klondike Minecart is not worth $50,000?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS Your honor, the Plaintiff has no standing per rule 2.1 #1. The Plaintiff is a member of the party they are suing, so in essence they are suing themself and there is no “injury caused by a clear second party” as they have...

1. When was the of the Oakridge axe? 2. Are all "collectables" worth the same amount?

Just the minecart that was in the mystery box.

What price tag did the DOC determine Klondike was worth? Did the DOC use any marketplace or CPI analysis to determine if that price was accurate?

Just for clarification, do you mean that the minecart was valuable 2 years ago or in 2025?

Having reviewed the contents and/or the evidence provided by either the Plaintiff or the Defendant, which items in particular did the DOC value high enough to justify the $50,000 bid?

What is your definition of "seemingly valuable"? Was CPI consulted prior to this mystery box being approved?

Firstly, I hope you are okay from last night. What is your process for approving a mystery box auction, as an economist?