Search results

  1. E

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ebborsnam v. Bar Association of Redmont

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR NOLLE PROSEQUI I no longer wish to pursue this case. I reflected upon myself and my actions, and what I did was not okay, pursuing this lawsuit isn't going to help in any way. I will accept the BAR's censure (and if they wish to...
  2. E

    Lawsuit: Dismissed waygooda v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 60

    Your Honor, I'd like to inform the court that I am no longer representing the Commonwealth on this matter.
  3. E

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ebborsnam v. Bar Association of Redmont

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Ebborsnam Plaintiff v. The Bar Association of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. The Bar Association of Redmont...
  4. E

    Lawsuit: In Session Yeet_Boy v. Town of Oakridge and Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] SCR 13

    Attorney General, last time I checked, the town of Oakridge is also in the name of this case, I am an oakridge town attorney.
  5. E

    Lawsuit: In Session Yeet_Boy v. Town of Oakridge and Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] SCR 13

    Any update as to the status of this case, Your Honors? It has been one month.
  6. E

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ebborsnam v. Smallfries

    IN THE COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF DEMOCRACYCRAFT Ebborsnam, Plaintiff v. smallfries, Defendant Civil Action No. 2026-___ COMPLAINT I. PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Ebborsnam is a citizen of DemocracyCraft. 2. Defendant smallfries is a citizen of DemocracyCraft and may be served through the...
  7. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    This might be the first objection you ever made without AI lol
  8. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    I can't pay that, any possibility this could be less money?
  9. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    Me personally then, matthew shouldn't suffer consequences
  10. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Oh btw, don't get the commonwealth in trouble for this, I resigned
  11. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    Oh yeah Your Honor. Mmiqa in fact uses chatgpt. He even uses the signature chatgpt — all the time.
  12. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    Yeah, we got it after I retracted my objection.
  13. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Let me give some additional testimony, Mmiqa is a temu chatGPT lawyer who deserves disbarment. Sue me lol.
  14. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    Your Honor I retract my objection as I've been made aware that the BAR themself might be handling this case instead of the Department of Justice.
  15. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, acknowledging that the Commonwealth has not been summoned for this matter, I'd like to point out the blatant violation of procedure here, court rule 3.3 states "... Amendments to the complaint must be...
  16. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    4. To my knowledge there is no such thing as §6(b) of the Criminal Code Act. 6. Again, § 6(b) of the Criminal Code Act does not exist to my knowledge. 7. Sorry, but the statement in this question is simply untrue, I told him I needed proof before accepting the dispute, I never said anything...
  17. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Your Honor, how long do I have to answer?
Back
Top