Search results

- Username: Aladeen22 - What are your strengths and weaknesses?: One of my main strengths is my experience in law. Throughout the years, I have served in multiple legal roles, including Chief Justice. This gives me a strong understanding of the law and courtroom management. A weakness I...

We know.

In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court dismisses this case without prejudice pursuant to Rule 2.1(2) and 2.2. The Plaintiff’s claim for relief are not based on any law and instead argue why the Plaintiff believes the Defendant is at fault. A valid claim for relief must allege the violation of a...

In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court of Redmont has decided to dismiss this case sua sponte without prejudice. As written, the complaint narrowly falls outside of the jurisdiction of the Court, as the declaratory judgment requested here does not necessarily automatically mean removal from...

In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to grant this appeal. The Appellant, has seventy-two hours to post their Appellant Brief. @ToadKing

In a 3-0 decision the Supreme Court has voted to reject this appeal. The ruling properly evaluated the requirement in light of constitutional structure in regard of confirmations and concluded that the omission did not invalidate Judge Amity’s appointment. The Senate’s constitutional authority...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Toadking v The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 18 Civil Action I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION The Plaintiff argues that Judge Amity’s confirmation was unlawful because they did not submit the financial disclosure required under the...

Thank you for your remarks, this appeal is now in recess pending verdict.

Objection overruled, you now have 72 hours to present your response brief. @ToadKing

A new judge is in the process of being assigned.

The Appellee will have 72 hours to present their brief. @Kaiserin_

In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to grant this appeal. The Appellant, has seventy-two hours to post their Appellant Brief. @ToadKing

We will follow the standard procedure and the evidence will not be admitted since it was not part of the original case. However, the motion to strike is overruled given that the appellant made a request, and not something which has disrupted this courts proceedings.

Objection sustained. The evidence was not part of the original case so it will be struck from the record.

The Appellant has 72 hours to post their response brief.

Extension granted.

The Appellee will have 72 hours to present their brief.

Yes there is, you can find it here https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/appealing-a-federal-court-decision.6657/

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to grant this appeal. The Appellant, has seventy-two hours to post their Appellant Brief. Apologies for not posting this on the forums as well.

In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to reject this appeal. The issues raised are about the conduct of a judicial officer in his official capacity as a judicial officer, which can only be reviewed through an appeal and not by filling a new case. Judges and the courts cannot be sued...