Search results

  1. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lawanoesepr v. The Redmont Bar Association [2022] SCR 4

    1. Because you were so delayed in responding. 2. See above.
  2. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    2. The Plaintiff alleges that our client aimed to disband Walmart. Within this, I will also include the allegations of market manipulation, and trying to gain access to Walmart company chests. In regards to market manipulation, the evidence is clear. Every witness called by the Plaintiff...
  3. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honour, opposing counsel, This case has dragged on for a long time, with 8 witnesses and over 100 forum posts. And yet, at its core this case is very simple. The key facts are not in dispute. There is one simple...
  4. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    We’d like to submit our closing statement after @PiOs67, in order to respond to any points he makes, given that the usual procedure is for the Plaintiff to provide a closing statement before the defence.
  5. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    Objection: Breach of Procedure The witness has responded, after being dismissed, without direction from the Judge. I would also like to take this opportunity to remind the Court that the Plaintiff had their chance to ask further questions of xerxesmc or remind them of unanswered questions, but...
  6. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    Objection: Hearsay Question 1 uses an out-of-court statement (by xerxesmc) used to prove the truth of the matter asserted (that our client was aware of DEC procedures) as it’s basis. Objection: Improper Evidence Question 2 uses text of the alleged logs, which may have been modified. The...
  7. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    I have no further questions, Your Honour.
  8. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    Questions for Olisaurus Were you ever sent a Cease and Desist letter concerning your use of the Walmart name and symbol? Were there any signs on the plot asking you not to enter, or to sell items to the chestshop? Did you intend to bankrupt or takeover Walmart at the time you sold items to the...
  9. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    I have no further questions, Your Honour.
  10. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    Yes, I have another two questions for xerxesmc based on his answer. So do you contend that your testimony was not influenced by the discussion around my clients actions that you had with him in this ticket...
  11. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    At this point we have a question for Trentrick Lamar: You claim that my clients actions were “akin to fraud”. Were or were they not fraud, in your opinion? And one for zerxesme: Are your responses those that you have decided based on your experiences and this court case, or were they already...
  12. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    Can I respond to that, Your Honour, given the accusations made by the Plaintiff?
  13. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    Objection: Speculation We object to General Questions 1, 2 and 6 on the grounds of speculation. The Plaintiff is asking the witnesses to testify about they think the Defendants believe. That is for this Court to decide, based on the evidence. Witnesses can only testify about their own actions...
  14. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    We would like to call Olisaurus and Vernicia.
  15. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, opposing counsel, This case is not about whether or not Walmart had to close, or even if our client was responsible for whether Walmart had to close, these facts are not in dispute. What is at issue in this...
  16. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    ANSWER TO COMPLAINT IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Walmart Co. Plaintiff v. Olisaurus (Lovely Law Firm Representing) Defendant Answer to Complaint (Numbers reference the claims made in the Plaintiff’s Facts section) Disputed. Law 13.6 Trespassing clearly states that...
  17. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Walmart co. v. Olisaurus123 and Montilou [2022] FCR 13

    Your Honour, I will be taking over this case from TpersonH. Despite discussion of an opening statement here, I cannot see an answer to complaint or motion to dismiss for Olisaurus, only Montilou. Should not I make an answer to complaint or motion to dismiss before opening statements?
  18. Magills0819

    Lawsuit: Dismissed kailabeann vs. Yeet63638 [2022] DCR 2

    My apologies for the error. However, it has no impact on the case, since being an employee of a competing business is still not permitted. Edit: It was never claimed that he was the owner of the business, merely that he “opened a new business”, which he did, since he is the co-owner of the...
Back
Top