Search results

Your Honor, thank you for the order. For clarification, the rental is named 432office-1, Lil Rossiya is just a nickname for the apartment complex that the rental is contained in. Apologies for any confusion.

Pursuant to Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Plaintiff requests the Defendant Vernicia to produce the following materials relevant to the case: 5. The complete contents of DHS Ticket 38152, including the original complaint or report that opened it.

Your Honour, the Plaintiff withdraws the Motion for an Order of Immediate Inspection and Preservation of Evidence (Post #2) and Post #14, conditioned on the Defendant Department of Homeland Security actually complying with the Plaintiff's discovery request (Item 4) to run the /inspect command...

Pursuant to Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Plaintiff requests the Defendant Department of Homeland Security to produce the following materials relevant to the case: 3. Any policy, system configuration, or documentation establishing that DHS ticket internal notes...

Your Honour, Vernicia's objection raises three points. None of them supports denying the Motion. First, screenshots cannot show when a book was edited. While I expect the neutral screenshots to simply match mine, if they do not, then using the /inspect command would show exactly when the book...

Pursuant to Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Plaintiff requests the Defendant Department of Homeland Security to produce the following materials relevant to the case: 1. The complete contents of DHS Ticket 38152, including the original complaint or report that...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR AN ORDER OF IMMEDIATE INSPECTION AND PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE The Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court for an order directing the immediate inspection and preservation of any posted notices at 432office-1, Lil Rossiya, and in...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Slime_Mario Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont (Department of Homeland Security) & Vernicia Defendants COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendants as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW The Plaintiff respectfully moves for judgment as a matter of law against the Defense on all three of its Defenses, and in support thereof, alleges: Introduction Your Honor, the Defense has submitted no...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, The Plaintiff objects to the unauthorized remarks posted by the third-party individual totemundying in Post #29. This individual is not a party to this case, is not legal counsel, and posted these...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Introduction Your Honor, the Defendant has affirmed in Fact 2 that the database name "S.M.Law" is fully compatible with in-game plugin. The only remaining dispute in this case is a legal question over the interpretation of...

I request an extension to 7/6/26 @ 9pm EDT.

I apologize for any confusion and not making my initial filing clearer that this was an interlocutory appeal.

Your Honor, Yes, I formally confirm that this is an interlocutory appeal of the District Court's denial of the Motion to Recuse in Slime_Mario v. Department of Commerce [2026] DCR 92.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Your Honor, The Plantiff is not appealing a final verdict from the District Court. Therefore, the standard appeals hierarchy and the precedent of [2025] DCR 106 Appeal do not apply. This appeal is an...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO REMARKS Your Honor, the Plaintiff respectfully rejects the Presiding Officer's proposal to bypass the Supreme Court: The Guide - Motions (Recuse) states that a recusal motion is decided first by the presiding judge, and then the...

The official Motions guide said it had to be the Chief Justice.

Username: Slime_Mario I am representing myself What Case are you Appealing?: [2026] DCR 92 Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Pending - Slime_Mario v. Department of Commerce [2026] DCR 92 Basis for Appeal: The Presiding Officer, Judge Muggy21, committed clear bias, a factual error...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECUSE The Plaintiff respectfully moves for the recusal of the Presiding Officer, Judge Muggy21, from this case, and in support thereof, alleges: Actual and Perceived Bias: Under the established grounds for recusal in the Guide -...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure / Relevance Your Honor, the Plaintiff formally objects to the Defendant's listing of the "Staff Team" as a witness on the following grounds: Breach of Procedure: Under the established Staff Precedent as applied...