Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION BnyBny_ Plaintiff v. Elv_K Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. BnyBny_ as the plaintiff 2. TaechiMTEA as the co-plaintiff 3...

Yes I do. The defense would like to thank all parties involved.

The defense acknowledges this.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Good afternoon Your Honor, plaintiffs and hopefully all people reading this thread in the future. Something that we all know is that unless proven otherwise, everyone is innocent. The evidence will show all of the...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE + BREACH OF PROCEDURE The plaintiff posts without court allowing it, with no real purpose and the defence suspects use of artificial intelligence in order to write this statement. The defence asks the court to: 1. To...

The defence consents to ending the discovery early.

1987

The changes were made, thank you for your consideration once again

1. Quote "The Plaintiff alleges". Defence can't deny what the plaintiff is alleging. Defence still denies those allegations. 2. The defence has no way of knowing either of those facts. 3. The defence still didn't affirm any of those allegations. 4. No comment. 5. The defendant stated that...

Yes the defence opposes since: All evidence of request number 1 is publicly available. Request number 2 requires the defence to prove something did not occur, so it is not possible to fulfill it. All evidence of request number 3 is publicly available under the thread mentioned in P-003. Request...

The defence would like to end discovery early. Does the plaintiff consent?

The defendant's intentions to harm the plaintiff are not proven in the evidence. Therefore the defence asks for this objection to be overruled.

The plaintiff didn't provide evidence proving any harm or even that anyone saw the post. Actually, the plaintiff assumes facts not in evidence not proving any harm at all. Therefore the defence asks for this objection to be overruled.

Answer to Complaint IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1lLight Plaintiff v. coslos Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The defence AFFIRMS fact 1 in the complaint. 2. The defence DENIES fact 2 in the complaint. No evidence was provided. 3. The defence...

Username: coslos Active Playtime: 14d 16h Which role are you expressing interest for: Draftsman What can you bring to the role: I work fast. Unemployed fast What tasks are you looking forward to do: I would just love to learn how bills work and gain political knowneladge. (Exclusive for...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - SPECULATION The prejury objection was overruled in message #37 of this thread therefore the plaintiff is not allowed to use post #18 as an argument since it was edited with the use of rule 3.4

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT The plaintiff still didn't provide fully confirmed proof. The defendant was never presented with any proof of the machine malfunctioning, neither in court nor outside of it. The defendant only stated what could be a reason of...

1. the defence has the right to change their denial or affirm of the fact under the rule 3.4 of courts rules and procedures 2. again, this behaviour is allowed under rule 3.4 of courts rules and procedures 3. the motion was not granted. The evidence was objected and as the defendant said "The...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS - RULE 5.5 The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed with prejudice, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The plaintiff has insufficient evidence to prove any of his claims DATED...

The defence would like to use their rights from rule 3.4 of court rules and procedures Information - Court Rules and Procedures [Deprecated] The previous answer to complaint had a few fact errors therefore in exchange for the current answer and defences the defence posts a remade and fact...