Search results

  1. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, considering the Co-Defendant responded to the motion right before Discovery ended, and in light of the recent ruling on the Perjury objection, we request that Your Honour exercise Rule 1.2 and permit the Plaintiff to add MrCheesGuy to the witness list.
  2. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your Honour, this response is blatantly false and misleading. The Co-Defendant's Head of Legal Department, Dearev, without being prompted about it, willingly shared that the Co-Defendant had a policy regarding the sharing...
  3. T

    Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. ToadKing_ [2026] FCR 34

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS The Prosecution respectfully asks the Court to deny the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. 1. On Count One, the Defendant argues that political advocacy, voting conduct, or a contractual promise not to support...
  4. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, with Discovery ending in almost 48 hours, the Plaintiff would like gently remind the Court of the Motion to Compel in #81 as Your Honour hasn't indicated any ruling.
  5. T

    Accepted Appoint Dr.Ekplosive to Chairperson of RBA

    I, TheSnowGuardian, move to elect Dr Eksplosive to the position of Chairperson.
  6. T

    Information Expression of Interest - Magistrate

    - Username: TheSnowGuardian - What are your strengths and weaknesses?: Strengths: 1. Activity -> Currently I do have a summer break, which means I am not significantly held up by real life academic work. 2. Supervising Work -> I've done a lot of supervising work in my time as an employee of...
  7. T

    Appeal: Pending [2026] DCR 37 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 40

    Your Honour, is the Federal Court going to hear this appeal?
  8. T

    Appeal: Pending [2026] DCR 37 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 40

    Username: TheSnowGuardian I am representing a client Who is your Client?: Talion & Partners INC., Noadenmark What Case are you Appealing?: [2026] DCR 37 Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - Noadenmark v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 37 Basis for Appeal: The Court did not...
  9. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    INTERROGATORIES TO THE CO-DEFENDANT @Johnes 1. Are the contents of applications publicly disclosed without consent of the concerned applicant even if the application was accepted?
  10. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour @Franciscus , Due to the untimely responses of the Defence and the Co-Defence to the Interrogatories, the Plaintiff has been unable to ask further interrogatories. I plead the Court to acknowledge the other parties of the case sent their responses at 2:47 AM IST Yesterday and the 72...
  11. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY QUESTION IN #91 [FILED ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF] The Plaintiff submits P-006 as the response to this question.
  12. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE IN #90 [FILED ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF] Your Honour, The Plaintiff objects to this informal response made by the Defence: The Court, at the beginning of discovery in #62, stated that, "[e]very motion, brief...
  13. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honour, According to 4.8 of Court Rules and Procedures, "Answers to Interrogatories must be made within 48 hours of being asked." The Defendants are late on their answers by 18 minutes. The Plaintiff...
  14. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, I would like to bring to the Court's attention that the Plaintiff wishes to ask further interrogatories on the basis of the contents Motion to Compel. Additionally, to correct the record, is partially incoherent, and to correct it, "sent him a message link .. " is meant to be...
  15. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    It relates to information covered by the Privacy Act.
  16. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, Plaintiff requests for a sidebar, I have information to disclose to the Court that would be better disclosed in Closed Court.
  17. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL [FILED ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF] Noting the Co-Defendant's Head of Legal Department in the ticket (P-005) with TheSnowGuardian said "that is something from the bot not dependent on us now we have a policy not to share those...
  18. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    We intend to ask further interrogatories and submit motions to compel, based on how co-operative the Defence is going to be.
  19. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, can the Plaintiff respond to this? We wouldn't mind if this was done in a sidebar so as to not flood the docket.
Back
Top