Search results

  1. Dogeington

    Election Council Elections - JUNE 2025

    I, Sir_Dogeington, declare that I will be contesting a seat as the Head of Event Coordination as a member of Workers' Party of Redmont.
  2. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Pending Vernicia v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 51

    RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES 1. Yes or no: Did, at any point during the active consideration of the so-called "bank holiday" and prior to its initial announcement, the Attorney General, other DoJ Staff, Secretary of Commerce, or other DoC staff express doubt as to the legality of the so-called...
  3. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Pending Vernicia v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 51

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Vernicia Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AFFIRM that on the UTC Morning of 16 May 2025, the Department of Commerce issued an announcement regarding the creation of a so-called...
  4. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    @Dr_Eksplosive Your Honor, I have finished my examination of the witnesses, and Dartanboy is waiting on rulings for his two objections.
  5. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Gnomewhisperer and GnomeCorp v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 47

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The defense objects to the calling of xEndeavour (the author of the Taxation Act) as a witness to testify to the supposed intent behind the legislation. The Redmont Constitution is clear: it is the role of the judiciary to...
  6. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Gnomewhisperer and GnomeCorp v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 47

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR CLOSED COURT SESSION Your Honor, The evidence that the court has compelled is classified to a CABINET level, all conversations pertaining to the decision process that ultimately led to the "bank holiday" is classified in this...
  7. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Gnomewhisperer and GnomeCorp v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 47

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE The following witnesses are not relevant to the issue at hand as they are not related to the disputed facts of the case. 5. 1950minecrafter 6. Freeze_Line 7. Dearev 8. Stoppers 9. Omegabiebel 10. DonTrillions 11. Nexalin...
  8. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    No more questions, your honor.
  9. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    Could you elaborate on how v__d's statements affected you emotionally?
  10. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    What differences you have experianced in how people treated you during and after the Mayoral election cycle?
  11. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Gnomewhisperer and GnomeCorp v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 47

    TO OBJECTION As much as the Plaintiff would insinuate, it is not for the Commonwealth to speculate on whether or not citizens hold an account with one or any financial institution. In regard to the case at hand, it is for the Plaintiff to prove that they have accounts with financial...
  12. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    Questions for @RylandW 1. Did you, during your time in the house, pass any bills related to the economy? 2. Did you plan on ending or changing elections in Aventura if you became the mayor? 3. Did you have any intention of becoming the permanent mayor of Aventura if elected? 4. How did you feel...
  13. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Gnomewhisperer and GnomeCorp v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 47

    Your Honor, I respectfully request that I may respond to the objection presented by the Plaintiff.
  14. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Gnomewhisperer and GnomeCorp v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 47

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. Rule 5.5 (Lack of Claim) The Department of Commerce did not violate the constitutional rights of the...
  15. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Gnomewhisperer and GnomeCorp v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 47

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT GnomeWhisperer and GnomeCorp Plaintiffs v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AFFIRM that on the UTC Morning of 16 May 2025, the Department of Commerce issued an announcement regarding the creation...
  16. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    @Dr_Eksplosive Your Honnor, I belive that all of the witnesses have made their presence known to the court, and Dartanboy is waiting on a ruling for his Motion to Reconsider.
  17. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Good evening, your honor, and may it please the court, Defamation has always been difficult to prove. The introduction of the No More Defamation Act sought to ease the burden of evidence held by the plaintiff by removing the clause which...
  18. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    Your Honor, I would agree to that
  19. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    Your honor, Due to personal matters that I have had to invest my time in, I would like to respectfully request a 24 hour extention for my opening statement.
  20. Dogeington

    Accepted Dogeington - Compliance Officer Application

    Username: Sir_Dogeington Total Playtime: 48hr 9min When are you most active? MST/PST Requirements: - Minimum of 48 hours of play time. - I am available on Discord. - I show in my application why you are best suited for the position. - I am able to work effectively and efficiently in a...
Back
Top