Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Brief 1. The Commonwealth has no material interest in the properties affected by the emergency injunction. Following discussions with the DCT, none of the listed properties have DCT eviction notices and are not awaiting auction by the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The court is misunderstanding the Defense's Motion to Dismiss. In its denial of the Defense's MTD, the court does establish that special elections must take place to maintain that 11 member count for the House of...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS 1. Rule 5.5 (Lack of Claim) The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Redmont Part 1 §3 states, This is a requirement stated by the constitution for the size and composition of the House; it must be composed of 11 citizens...

Present, Your Honour

Present, Your Honour

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION rotcepsnI Prosecution v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRM that on the 14th of February 2026, Plaintiff was appointed to the Agricultural Commission by President Multiman155. (P-001) 2. AFFIRM...

So sorry your honor but I will need a six hour extension of this deadline

Present, Your Honour

Present, your honor

I am told that consistant with section 4.4 of OCB's CoI, "4.4 Removal & Replacement. The board may remove officers (including the CEO) by amajority vote with documented legal reasoning. Vacancies are filled by Board appointment untilthe next formal appointment procedure decided by the Board." It...

The Commonwealth would ask that this case be dismissed with prejudice for the reasons stated in it's MTD.

Your honor I believe this is an attempted motion to Nolle Prosequi

Your Honor, in that case, there are still the perjury objection and motion to strike. Are those tolled pending the MTD?

your honor, Does this apply to all pending deadlines? Or only the MTD

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI The plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this case in light of large issues arising from mistakes made in filing. We humbly petition the court to dismiss this case without prejudice so that we may re file.

Hello your honor, I am here notifying the court of a change in the plaintiff' s council, I will be representing Oakridge Community Bank from here on out.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE The Plaintiff states in Fact 1 that, “‘Tax Brackets’ or other related terms such as ‘bracket amounts’ are technical and specific terms that refer to a specific way of calculating taxes.” This definition is not a fact - it is a...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS - LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION - LACK OF CLAIM The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: Rule 5.5, Lack of Claim In the appeal of Anthony_Ord v...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT When the Commonwealth seizes a company in order to protect the citizens of Redmont, it is, in part, subject to the liability incurred by any director/manager under the Legal Entity Act. As seen in Privacy Matters v. Nexalin...

The Commonwealth is present your honor