Search results

Your honor, I would ask for clarification on how it is distasteful? As per Rule 1.12 3 (c),  Griswold provides both the factual and historical background of the legal theory of Penumbral Rights.

Since people are not satisfied with this, I'll state more reasons I am unhappy with this bill: - DoC would get power to arbitrarily freeze assets (no due process for unreasonable seizure) - DoC would get to access accounts of financial institutions (no due process for unreasonable search) - DoC...

Nay - "Super Acts" like this one are, with few exceptions, too complicated for the average citizen to read and understand. Having these regulations spread out across the four acts they're already in actually helps readability. Furthermore, making this "Super Act" makes it far too easy to hide...

Aye - Has a redundant clause but we need this to go through

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT IN RE [2026] FCR 65 | [2026] SCR 23 I apologize for the subpar formatting of this post. I am writing this on my phone due to my continued IRL circumstances. Regrettably, my kidney stone has not moved on. PART I - BURDEN OF PROOF / MEANING OF...

Your honor, I deeply apologize but my car started overheating on the way back today and I'm currently passing a kidney stone. Could I get a final 48 hour extension?

Nay - Why are we making it illegal to get sick? ("Recklessly exposes themselves to a contagious disease")

Abs - I think this is an excellent idea, but we should work  with the DCT to come up with a plan for it.

Could I receive a 72 hour extension due to being out of town for a funeral?

Abs - This isn't bad, per se, but it fails to address the real issues with legal fees. I will introduce a new bill when I am back from LOA.

Nay - This doesn't actually do anything. If I wanted to remove every single section of the CCA, it could still be done by passing 3 bills without supermajority. Either commit and say any amendment requires supermajority, or don't do this at all.

I don't suppose so.

I have changed the OP as requested.

My apologies, your honor. I suppose yes, I seek oral argument. Unless this must take place in VC or in-game (I'm currently dealing with a lot IRL). Then no. It's not perfectly clear what this means. It is not defined in the appeal format post.

Client and Counsel Name: Dartanboy I am representing myself Appealed Case Name & Style: [2026] FCR 65 Were you originally the plaintiff or defendant: Plaintiff Reason for Appeal: The Federal Court made one error of fact and one error of law: (Error of Fact) 1. The Court incorrectly decided...

Nay - Town jurisdiction needs to be clearly laid out. Also what happens if a Town makes a crime that is already a federal crime (e.g. Town makes murder illegal)?

Nay - If the DDLA can theoretically have all the same powers of the DLA then it should have the same Conflict of Interest requirements.

Nay - Advertising should never be allowed within polling places, which should remain neutral always. Furthermore it becomes very difficult to enforce. What happens if a billboard is put up within 50 blocks of a polling place and it is not taken down when an election begins? The action was...

Aye - Our population has grown immensely. It's time to grow Congress too.

Nay - There is absolutely no reason that two Senators should be able to unilaterally make a decision for the Senate. This bill is precisely the opposite of Democracy; attempting to create Oligarchy.