Search results

  1. O

    Lawsuit: In Session xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 109

    Your Honor, I apologize for the disorganization, but yes, I do intend to add xEndeavour as my co-counsel in this proceeding. I think his wealth of knowledge will help this case, Court Rules and Procedures is silent on the matter as to what the procedure to add counsel to a case is to my...
  2. O

    Lawsuit: In Session xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 109

    Your Honor, since it feels like there's nothing we could reasonably request at this time and no witnesses to call, we'd like to proceed straight to legal brief under 3.6.2(c).
  3. O

    Lawsuit: In Session xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 109

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR INQUEST PROCEEDING Pursuant to Court Rule 3.6.1, the plaintiff respectfully moves for inquest proceeding seeing as the defendant failed to file a reply in an alloted deadline at post #9.
  4. O

    Lawsuit: In Session xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 109

    Your Honor @Talion77, I apologize, it was not my intent to deceive the court - I wasn't entirely aware of whether the government had returned the money pursuant to the EI or not. Upon seeing your screenshot and further review with my client, I can confirm it is so.
  5. O

    Lawsuit: In Session xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 109

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, as you have noted, permitting the Commonwealth to file such a brief would be a breach of procedure. Responses to responses are typically not permitted (Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 96...
  6. O

    Lawsuit: In Session xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 109

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER Your Honor, Denying someone the access to their entire balance, possibly as this matter takes weeks or months to go through the court system is irreparable harm, because the court would be denying the plaintiff...
  7. O

    Lawsuit: In Session xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 109

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION Your Honour, The defendant, Commonwealth of Redmont, has seized plaintiff's entire balance (as indicated by exhibit P-001 filed later in this post) seemingly without providing proper justification, in a way...
  8. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    Your Honor, I am unable to continue pursuing this court case, as my employment at Department of Justice got terminated without notice. I request that Attorney General be informed of this case and assign proper Commonwealth representation to it.
  9. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    Present, your Honor. Not to clutter this docket further, I'll only respond to question 1, as I had filed answers to all of the other questions earlier: 1. Technically the answer is yes, but given that responding as such is probably not responsive enough, so I'll identify the plants to the best...
  10. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    3. What evidence did your investigation obtain establishing when the alleged plants were originally planted? None as such. The Commonwealth's theory is of possession/retention, thus no evidence of the plants being planted was required. 4. Did your investigation establish who constructed the...
  11. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER The prosecution does not contest that the messages were sent as stated in the motion, however, I think both sides of this proceeding have been in casual contact regarding this proceeding through various media...
  12. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    The Commonwealth does not oppose the above request.
  13. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    Your Honor, The prosecution would like to preemptively request a 48 hour extension to prosecution's objection to the initial questions (noted as point 3 in Your Honor's "order of events" listing) or at least the permission to strike them and the answers post-hoc pursuant to an objection on the...
  14. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honor, the prosecution can present the following reasoning as to each of those points: 1. Failure to Establish Cultivation "Growing" is vague and, the prosecution believes, worthy of remaining a point under...
  15. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, The prosecution would like to start the case with these simple words: res ipsa loquitur (latin for "the thing speaks for itself"). The record within P-001 and P-002 alone suffices. The grown plants were, on that...
  16. O

    Information Expression of Interest - Magistrate

    Username? OwnedBlock. What are your strengths and weaknesses? Strengths: - prior experience with cases (hey, better than some of the other candidates) - experience with keeping secrecy of sensitive information (as RBI Director, I currently hold SC-1 clearance, have held it for 57-ish days and...
  17. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    Would the Commonwealth be permitted to object to these items or for the answers to them to be stricken afterwards? The Commonwealth is most strongly concerned about item 3, but also partially in regards to items 1 or 2. The Commonwealth does not seek to hold up this court any longer, merely to...
  18. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    Your Honor, would the court permit for the Commonwealth to object to these questions using typical objections as they would apply to witness questioning before they're ultimately submitted (or at least to strike them afterwards)? This seems to be a mock form of witness questioning of some kind...
  19. O

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. unfethum [2026] FCR 97

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT NOTICE OF PLEA DEAL AGREEMENT Your Honor, The Commonwealth of Redmont has reached a plea deal with the public defender representing the defendant, with the prosecution now recommending the following: - a total fine of 125 Penalty Units...
  20. O

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    The Commonwealth is withdrawing the request in post #63 as moot.
Back
Top