Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISSAL I will grant the motion to dismiss, but instead of Rule 5.14, it will be for Rule 5.5 for Lack of Claim. The defendant brings up an important issue when it comes to the complaint and the evidence provided. The timezones...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISSAL I will be granting the defense's motion to dismiss under Rule 5.5 for the following reasons. The Plaintiff brings forth 4 claims of relief. The first is for wrongful death, which is the easiest of the 4 claims to dismiss...

Granted

The deadline for the answer to complaint will be tolled until a ruling on the motion to dismiss is issued

Granted. You have 48 hours

You have 24 hours to respond. I won't be ruling on this yet, but I am inclined to accept this. The plaintiff has the burden to provide corroborating evidence for these logs during discovery; otherwise, they will be struck. The defense has 48 hours to provide their answer to complaint

You have 48 hours to provide an answer to complaint

This case is then dismissed upon acceptance of the settlement.

Does the commonwealth agree @ameslap ?

Overruled. Even though the statement was late, I am allowing it We will now be entering recess pending verdict

@hincho_ , is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Avatarnate7983 v. Hincho_ [2026] DCR 85

@Alexotto09 , is required to appear before the District Court in the case of t3rrarian v. Alexotto09 [2026] DCR 83

@ThatBritishGuy , is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Catguy666 v. _ThatBritishGuy_ [2026] DCR 82

@Zombie_Bro_ , is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Barclays v. Zombie_Bro [2026] DCR 86

@wttn2c is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v wttn2c [2026] DCR 80

@bob598 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Pandahacker5498 v Bob Bobby [2026] DCR 79

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL This case has six claims, but in practice only has two. Claims III-VI are more prayers of relief, looking for compensation related to actions covered in Claims I and II. These two claims are for wrongful death and...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL Upon reviewing the case file, it has come to the court's attention that the person filing does not hold any legal qualifications, as indicated in the provided screenshot. Without at least the solicitor qualification, a...

@ameslap , is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Vernicia v Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 53

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Commonwealth of Redmont v Vendeka inc [2026] FCR 16 I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION Vendeka Inc has committed two counts of Falsification of an Audit Report and two counts of third-party misrepresentation. They failed to properly audit the...