Search results

Defendant was sent the following in-game mail.

@LegoMasterW472 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of MJL_ v. LegoMasterW472 [2026] DCR 118.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - QUALIFICATION The Court, upon sua sponte review of @lnvlsbie's legal qualifications, finds that counsel lacks the admin law qualification. The Court is concerned that the subject matter of this case may require said...

@AmityBlamity is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of .CrownedEtyYT, waygooda v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 60

I recuse from this action due to prior encounters with the Defendant.

Your honour, I am no longer employed at the DOJ. No one else at the DOJ is receiving notifications for this case. I will make the relevant parties aware cc: @ameslap @AmityBlamity

The Defense neither affirms nor denies fact 18. May we edit our answer to show this? Additionally, I will not be representing the Commonwealth moving further.

I remember Ethamn! He was a great leader at the SKP and a good guy. He should come back!

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honour, Plaintiff moves for the Court to only consider the now-deprecated Court Rules and Procedure because the present case was filed when these regulations were still in place. The Defence believes...

The Defence requests a 3-day extension to Discovery noting that it is currently exam season. @Muggy21 @Slime_Mario - Superwoops Interim Solicitor General

May we submit an answer to both of these motions?

It has come to the DOC’s attention that the plugin limitations are an issue that must be brought to the Court’s attention as a yet-unresolved matter. This is in relation to in-game /db naming and what has previously been told to the DOC. We see no reason to strike the witness.

The Defence calls the Staff Team as a witness.

Alright, the Defense affirms all facts seeing as no other viable option is available. Furthermore, the Acting Attorney General is @ameslap

That was the second, less favourable position for the Defense. The ideal scenario, which was the first priority outlined in my response, is to allow us to respond to each fact as we see fit. See the following: Only failing this (as in, the Court ruling against this course of action) would we...

Ideally not, your honour. The Defense intends to contest at least one of the 4 additional facts added by the Plaintiff.

The Governor is already back, your honour.

Good afternoon your honour @ko531, We'd just like to know the status of this as it's been sitting for a while. Thank you!

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Slime_Mario Plaintiff v. Department of Commerce Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. Affirm. 2. Affirm. 3. Affirm. 4. Affirm. 5. Affirm. 6. Affirm. 7. Affirm. 8. Affirm. 9. Affirm. 10. Affirm. 11. Affirm. 12. Affirm. 13...

Present