Search results

  1. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL (ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF) The Plaintiff believes that the Defendant has deleted messages that replied to JuliaMC_ and messages that were sent in regards to this whole controversy. (See P-001 and P-003) TheSnowGuardian, on...
  2. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, the Plaintiff resubmits this (modified) motion: IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL (ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF) The Plaintiff believes that the Defendant has deleted messages that replied to JuliaMC_ and messages that were sent in regards to...
  3. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. ToadKing_ [2026] FCR 34

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND The Prosecution would like to add the following exhibit:
  4. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, we (the Plaintiff) ask that the Defendants' answer to complaint be tolled until the Motion to Reconsider (#25) is ruled on.
  5. T

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Noadenmark v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 37

    The Plaintiff humbly requests the Court to rule on the Counterclaim after witness testimony is heard on the orginal claim, should said witness testimony even happen.
  6. T

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Noadenmark v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 37

    Your Honour, we have a procedural question: When would the Counterclaim be ruled on?
  7. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, I have a procedural question: Is this extension granted to the Defence aswell? As they seem to have not submitted a response to Motion to Reconsider.
  8. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, can this please be the last extension they get..
  9. T

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Noadenmark v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 37

    Your Honour, Apologies for our confusion, to begin with: 1. We retract our Motion to Reconsider and Brief. 2. Additionally, we would like an extension of 48 hours on witness questions. We're trying to get in touch with the Defendant for an out-of-court settlement and we would much rather...
  10. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS The Defendant’s interpretation that one can only seek damages should be quantifiable is a dangerous one. The PALANTIR Act amended the Privacy Act to include section 6(h) on 28 December 2025. The RCCA was signed...
  11. T

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Noadenmark v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 37

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COUNTER COMPLAINT Zombie_Bro_ Counterplaintiff (CPlaintiff) v. Noadenmark Counterdefendant (CDefendant) I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRM the CDefendant sent the CPlaintiff $1,000 following an offer in global chat to repay $1,050...
  12. T

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Noadenmark v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 37

    Your Honour, The CDefence is under the impression that unless the Court permits you to respond to complaints by either summoning, ordering or by allowing a request to respond, you don't submit an answer. We already asked leave of the Court to submit before the Motion for Default Judgement was...
  13. T

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Noadenmark v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 37

    Your Honour @Muggy21 , I am briefly joining in as second chair on behalf of T&P. The first chair of this case has asked to file a response to the Counter Complaint in #10, #11 and #16. We are now in the stage of witness testiomony for the initial complaint. Can we please get a ruling on our...
  14. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honour, first of all, I don't believe I made an "attempt for the plaintiff to beg to be allowed to remove two legal council", and I resent the insinuation made by the Defense. My arguments were based on matters of...
  15. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, I fail to see the proper amendments into the objection. What I do see is "that a motion to reconsider may be failed when 'based on a point of law or new evidence'" (emphasis added) And additionally, "The Plaintiff has filed to add any new meaning .." (emphasis added)
  16. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, before I respond to this objection: Could the Defence please elaborate on what 'filed' means in the context of "The Plaintiff has filed to add any new meaning full content .."? What 'filled' means in the context of "a motion to reconsider may be filled when .."? Why the word...
  17. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honour, I am not of much legal tenure, nor are my legal arguments of great length. But I strive to ensure my clients have a fair trial and try to provide my best legal argument possible. The Plaintiff has a right to...
  18. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honour, the Plaintiff objects to @dodrio3 and @Johnes being the legal counsel in this case as they were employed and had access to private channels within Talion & Partners INC. when this case first came to...
Back
Top