Search results

Sustained - In part While the witness missed the deadline, I will give one final stretch of leeway for deadlines as it was only by roughly 20 minutes, and the Witness did say earlier it was a busy week. However, the witness did miss the other question and requested that the response to question...

And so close to the rumored return date, as well. Case Dismissed sua sponte without prejudice. The Plaintiff no longer has standing to pursue this case, as deported players are unable to participate in Court Cases. As reflected in similar cases in the DCR, this case can no longer proceed in its...

Struck for speaking out of turn, as you have not been summoned to this case. Possession of a passport does not equal confirmation of identity. We are looking for the Zombian Beer (formerly under the name "Zombian Blackwood", as shown in evidence) that holds the Minecraft username...

@FloorIsTired A bump on these questions, please answer within 12 hours under pain of contempt. If you require an extension, let me know.

IN THE DISTRICT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - fickogames v. Ollie_MineCraft [2026] DCR 22 Prosecution alleges that the Defendant committed Breach of Contract by failing to acquire Plot C117 through the DCT auction, despite the alleged contractual obligation to do so. Having instead...

Court is now in recess pending verdict. We thank both parties for their time.

@Zombie_Bro_ is required to appear before the District Court in the case of laygoes v Zombie_Bro_.

Overruled Witness did indeed answer the question, see the end of their response, "This is indeed true." Sustained Witness (@Wayne_Kerr12), please answer the question of what the discount was applied to[or "given on"], not the amount of the discount itself. Within 24 hours, please. Sustained...

@Wayne_Kerr12 As a reminder, witnesses have 24 hours to respond to questioning, as you did not ask for an extension, that time has long lapsed. Under pain of contempt, please answer the above questions. You will be held in contempt for every 12 hours after this post without a response, unless...

@Franciscus Any further questions? As for the missing witnesses XSync and Dontrillion, the courts cannot force them to appear, as they have already been threatened and then punished by contempt. We must assume they will not appear in a reasonable timeframe and should be disregarded, as...

Granted

The Defendant (@gribble19) shall now repeat the process for cross-examination. They have 24 hours, same rules apply.

Thank you all for your time; court in recess pending verdict.

Thank you for your prompt reply. This did indeed slip through the cracks while I was working around the other witnesses' time issues as well. The Court acknowledges its error and withdraws the contempt charge. It is now the 13th in most time zones. What does your timeline look like for a response?

Thank you for your prompt arrival! As the Plaintiff summoned this witness, they (@dodrio3) shall have 24 hours to question them. Upon receiving the question, the witness shall have 24 hours in return to respond. Please ping them whenever you ask to help keep all parties aware of anything sent...

Witness Emmdubz has long overshot the window to reply to witness questioning and shall, in turn, be held in contempt. They shall be fined $1,000 with no imprisonment, as they have otherwise been responsive. @Franciscus, does the plaintiff have any further questions?

This is dismissed for lack of a claim "Santa" is not real. Court Rules and Procedures Section 2.1 states that in order to pursue a case, you must be affected by an injury from a clear second party. The Court finds that this case was lodged without serious intent and, as such, finds the...

The Defendant now has 72 hours to produce their own closing statement.

The Court takes your silence to be a no. We will move on to closing statements. The Plaintiff (CC. @gert7) shall have 72 hours to produce one.

We will now move on to witness questioning. The Plaintiff brought forward one witness. @Wayne_Kerr12 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Wayne_kerr12 v Belloitte [2026] DCR 38