Search results

  1. Cat Oakridge

    Appeal: Denied Appeal in re:UrbanDispatchMC, Frivolous Court Case [2026] FCR 51

    - Client Name: UrbanDispatchMC - Counsel Name: UrbanDispatchMC - Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Plaintiff - Reason for the Appeal: The presiding judge issued a criminal charge of frivolous filing without affording the Plaintiff an opportunity to respond to or defend...
  2. Cat Oakridge

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UrbanDispatchMC v. pentagn

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION UrbanDispatchMC Plaintiff v. pentagn Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. UrbanDispatchMC, Plaintiff 2. pentagn, Defendant II...
  3. Cat Oakridge

    Lawsuit: Dismissed TheVeryBoredCat v. Town of Aventura [2026] DCR 56

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION TheVeryBoredCat Plaintiff v. Town of Aventura Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. TheVeryBoredCat (Plaintiff) 2. Town of Aventura...
  4. Cat Oakridge

    Lawsuit: Dismissed People for the Ninth Amendment v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 45

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION People for the Ninth Amendment (Class Action Group Represented by Serenity Law Services) Plaintiff v. Department of Homeland Security Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN...
Back
Top