This objection is denied. Plaintiff should be reminded that these are interrogatories, not witness questions. Both answers are unambiguous when considered in relation to the questions asked. Should the plaintiff seek further specificity, they should do so through additional interrogatories or...
This motion to strike is denied. As the defendant points out, the text logs submitted by the plaintiff are an adequate secondary source supporting the defense's text log submission.
@MMiqa
Refrain from argumentation within your filings and responses. There is a time and place for the type of argumentation you are presenting, namely during opening statements and closing statements.
This is your first warning.
The first objection, Perjury, is denied. The first element of perjury, as defined in the CCA, is that a person must "knowingly provide false testimony in a court of law." This court holds that, both within the context of Fact 13 and the subsequent court filings, the Plaintiff genuinely meant...
This Motion to Compel is granted, in part as it relates to the ticket shown in P-001 and P-006.
The Commonwealth has failed to establish that any other official communication between the DHS and the Plaintiff exists. Further, if such conversations did exist, one may assume that the Commonwealth...
The Motion to Dismiss under Rule 5.5 is denied.
Although the defence cites Rule 5.5 in their motion to dismiss, they seeminlgy missed the section wherin it states that:
The Motion to Dismiss under Rule 5.12 is denied. Rule 5.12 requires lack of standing. The argument made by the deffence...
This objection is denied. Rule 3.3 specifically is in reference to a change in the following,
Clerical errors relating to representation, notably separate from parties, need not be announced to the court, especially considering that a change in representation did not occur.
The court further...
This objection is denied. The losses suffered by the plantiff is a question of fact, to be proven in the course of argumentation and discovery. This court will not prematurely dismiss such a prayer, let alone charge the Plaintiff with perjury, for alleging that level of damages.
@budgetmich1 @Ebborsnam
Neither party followed the instructions in my court order. Both were explicitly ordered to not provide any other aspects of a civil response.
This is your first warning.
P-003 shall be struck, evidence must not be submitted outside of discovery, unless it was otherwise...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.