I see. No, I do not think this would be necessary. I have no qualms with "roleplay," but I don't want to waste time on an already overburdened docket. Your filing posted here will be good enough, and if we call a defendant and they question something, perhaps then we'll hear something in court...
I find @Wayne_Kerr12 in contempt of court. After being corrected, given lenience, ordered twice to not speak out of turn, being found in contempt on three counts, and then having an inappropriate statement struck from the court record, Plaintiff again decided to act brazenly, outrageously, and...
What would be the purpose or benefit of this? This is a brief, there will be no argumentation or questioning. This will just be you talking at us until you are done. And what would you need a sidebar for?
I deny this.
Commonwealth does not specify what rule they are asking for dismissal under, nor do they fully and correctly elaborate on their proposed reading of the cited authority. Without obvious authority to back the Commonwealth's arguments, we move on.
I will be presiding officer in this matter.
SUPREME COURT OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - JURISDICTION & CLAIM
The Supreme Court is unsure of the prima facie integrity of this filing. In dual issue, this Court commands the Commonwealth (@TheSnowGuardian, @AmityBlamity) to show:
How...
I will take over as presiding officer in this case.
Following the verdict in in re [2026] FCR 20 | [2026] SCR 12, proceedings here shall resume and the enjoinment is dissolved. The Commonwealth and the Town of Oakridge are ordered to submit their answers to the complaint within seventy-two...
SUPREME COURT OF REDMONT
ORDER - DISMISSAL
The Supreme Court of Redmont unanimously dismisses this appeal. In short, this appeal is totally invalid and ignores all of the proper statutory schema created to foster appeals and relevant interlocutory processes. See Judicial Standards Act ("JSA")...
Chief Justice Fries writes the unanimous opinion of the Court.
Appellant-Defendants Sergeant__Balls and Loose_Leaf_ (“Appellants”) file interlocutory appeal against the trial court in the instant case. Appellants together suggest several issues for appeal, but we only grant review of one...
DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
ORDER - DISMISSAL
I dismiss this action sua sponte for want of standing. See Le9endz_ v. AussieBloke25 [2026] DCR 59; MMiqa v. ZachOfPotatoes10 [2026] DCR 67. Simple murder alone cannot establish standing for a civil action. Id. Further, this complaint is deficient...
I find plaintiff @Wayne_Kerr12 in contempt of court. After being corrected, given lenience, and then ordered twice to not speak out of turn—the second time, on explicit pain of contempt—they have spoken yet again.
I charge them with three counts of contempt, one for each paragraph...
Consistent with appellate and statutory guidance, I find in addendum to my previous judgment it is prudent to award legal fees of $3,000. This is due to the minimum amount available in this venue being $3,000, and the minimum being above the 30% value of the previous judgment, $1,050.
In...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.