Search results

  1. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    WITNESS QUESTIONS @Bankowy 1. On the 21st of March 2026, were you pinged by the Defendant (Plura72) in the #politics channel of the DemocracyCraft Discord server? 2. If yes, what did the message which pinged you contain?
  2. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Two Guys Realty v. MasterCaelen [2026] FCR 43

    Defence will oppose use or inference of the evidences submitted in trial if used in open court, but will not oppose the use of these evidences for fact finding. Thus, No objections as of yet, Your Honour.
  3. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Two Guys Realty v. MasterCaelen [2026] FCR 43

    The Defence would like clarification as to what relevant law and what section of it classifies/privatized the evidence Plaintiff wishes to share.
  4. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Two Guys Realty v. MasterCaelen [2026] FCR 43

    Your Honour, we request an extension of Discovery
  5. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Two Guys Realty v. MasterCaelen [2026] FCR 43

    Your Honour, according to Federal Court regulations, the Plaintiff waived any response to this as 48 hours have passed, we request a ruling.
  6. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. ToadKing_ [2026] FCR 34

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CW'S RESPONSE TO FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Your Honour, As the Court rightfully noted that long-term deported players do not have any rights (and thus aren't afforded Public Defenders), we ask that the Court deny the MtD, and move forward with a...
  7. T

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Your Honour, the Plaintiff would not object to the Court granting another 24 hours of extension, even if the Defendants dont need it, however, we would ask the Court to duly note we will object to further extensions after this one is granted. The Plaintiff would also like the Court to note that...
  8. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Two Guys Realty v. MasterCaelen [2026] FCR 43

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL 2 Your Honour, The Defense moves that the Court compel the Plaintiff to: (1) produce the complete text log of the images show in P-004 and P-005 so that the Defense may independently verify them and inspect them for use in...
  9. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Two Guys Realty v. MasterCaelen [2026] FCR 43

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL Your Honour, The Defense moves that the Court compel (1) Staff/the DoC, and Reverie Reserve, aka RVR, for the financial records of DB 'TwoGuysRealty' from March 7th, 2026, 00:00 UTC to March 16th, 2026, 00:00 UTC. (2)...
  10. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Two Guys Realty v. MasterCaelen [2026] FCR 43

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honour, the Defense moves that this lawsuit be dismissed under: Rule 5.12 (Lack of Personal Jurisdiction); The Plaintiff lacks enough standing, and personal jurisdiction, as they never existed at the time that the...
  11. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Two Guys Realty v. MasterCaelen [2026] FCR 43

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE Your Honour, the Defense objects to P-007 and asks that it be struck from the Court Record for the following reasons: According to Court Rules and Procedures', Rule 4.6, Clearly, P-007 is a Google Docs link...
  12. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Two Guys Realty v. MasterCaelen [2026] FCR 43

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Two Guys Realty Plaintiff v. MasterCaelen Defendant I. Answer to Complaint 1. Deny, Plaintiff did not demonstrate Loan (if it exists and is valid) was between Plaintiff and the Defendant. 2. Deny, Plaintiff did not...
  13. T

    Appeal: Accepted [2026] DCR 37 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 40

    Your Honour, I never made a motion to recuse. I just said if Your Honour has prejudiced Your Honour's self I would strongly urge you to consider recusal. The meaning of the statement being, if you think you have prejudiced yourself, then I would ask you to recuse. Is this a sign that Your Honour...
  14. T

    Appeal: Accepted [2026] DCR 37 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 40

    Your Honour, If Your Honour has prejudiced Your Honour's self with my conduct regarding to a non-relevant case, then I would strongly urge that Your Honour consider a recusal. Otherwise, I intend to tell Your Honour that Your Honour's warning is duly considered and of course, will be adhered...
  15. T

    Appeal: Accepted [2026] DCR 37 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 40

    Your Honour, do I have to respond to this? 😁
  16. T

    Accepted Ask Congress 100,000$

    The vote on the motion is as follows: 2 in Favour 1 Against This votes on this motion meets quorum. Vote conducted on Discord, posted here for record keeping. @Dr_Eksplosive
  17. T

    Accepted Ask Congress 100,000$

    I, TheSnowGuardian, move to ask Congress 100,000$ in appropriations.
  18. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Two Guys Realty v. MasterCaelen [2026] FCR 43

    May it not please the court, PD from PD program is present.
  19. T

    Appeal: Accepted [2026] DCR 37 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 40

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Brief - APPELLANT'S BRIEF Your Honour, the appeal is quite simple. Talion & Partners INC. was supposed to get 3000$, the Honourable DCR missed it. Even if it was never originally asked for, stature requires that legal fees be awarded at a...
  20. T

    Appeal: Accepted [2026] DCR 37 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 40

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO "MOTION TO CLOSE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS" Your Honour, This is a Motion to Dismiss disguised as a "Motion to Close Appeal Proceedings". Which, I am sure the Appellee's counsel would know does not apply to appeals. Even if it weren't a...
Back
Top