@ko531 Incarnation__ DM'd me asking me about the Court's prior statement in #40.
The question was procedural in nature, so I explained that I was requesting a response to your second motion to compel. I don't find this to be ex-parte as the substance of the case was not discussed...
Your Honour, the Defendant has since been long deported.
Although a public defender can't represent a parties interest, its still Plaintiff's view that this settlement agreement is best for the financial system at large.
Sustained.
That being said, the Court can take judicial notice of things. An election is one of those things, the results are considered a public record not reasonably subject to dispute without cause.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Nolle Prosequi
Your Honour,
Parties have come to a settlement agreement. As Defense Counsel is a Public Defender, I request the Court accept our settlement agreement and adjudicate it as a final binding order of this Court.
```...
The Court will enter recess pending a verdict on May 8th.
Parties be advised that I'm writing a final paper due next week, I won't start writing anything until after the 13th.
Your Honour, parties are endeavouring (yes, a pun) to come to a settlement agreement.
I humbly request the proceedings be tolled for 72 hours for the sake of judicial economy and to allow discussions to materialize into a settlement.
DENIED on reconsideration. The cases cited hurt Defense's theory. In all of those FCR cases, the mere allegation of a debt (a judgment) is not itself evidence. An EI is only there to temporarily resolve an ongoing harm or a harm which will become irreversible. No precedent cited supports...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.