Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    The Court will administratively deny this motion. Please motion to reconsider the EI itself.
  2. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    You have 48 Hours to present an Answer Granted, the previous order will be modified to include all defendants be severally and jointly enjoined.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    Granted, a summons shall issue shortly.
  4. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    @ko531 Incarnation__ DM'd me asking me about the Court's prior statement in #40. The question was procedural in nature, so I explained that I was requesting a response to your second motion to compel. I don't find this to be ex-parte as the substance of the case was not discussed...
  5. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    Granted. The Court will make a ticket and request this information. @Incarnation__ You have 48 Hours for the other Motion to Compel.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    You dare rush me? You shall be executed for this Discovery is now open until 5/13/26 @ 9pm EST.
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned TheStockExchange et. al v. L4ndaakk [2026] FCR 36

    Your Honour, the Defendant has since been long deported. Although a public defender can't represent a parties interest, its still Plaintiff's view that this settlement agreement is best for the financial system at large.
  8. M

    Lawsuit: In Session Social Democrat Party and Stanley582 v. Commonwealth Of Redmont [2026] FCR 29

    Sustained. That being said, the Court can take judicial notice of things. An election is one of those things, the results are considered a public record not reasonably subject to dispute without cause.
  9. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    SUSTAINED, Defendant didn't offer a new argument or offer any new facts that aren't borne from this case or cited case law.
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned TheStockExchange et. al v. L4ndaakk [2026] FCR 36

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion to Nolle Prosequi Your Honour, Parties have come to a settlement agreement. As Defense Counsel is a Public Defender, I request the Court accept our settlement agreement and adjudicate it as a final binding order of this Court. ```...
  11. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    If you fail to post an answer by May 8th, 2026 at 9pm EST, I'll proceed in default judgement.
  12. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    @Incarnation__ Where's your Answer at. You requested 24 hours at 12:36AM EST, I'm assuming you have something for us?
  13. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    What's this new information? You generally can't file a motion to reconsider against a motion to reconsider, we'd never get anywhere.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    No, but there's nothing stopping you from including that in your Answer.
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IgnitedTnT v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 20

    The Court will enter recess pending a verdict on May 8th. Parties be advised that I'm writing a final paper due next week, I won't start writing anything until after the 13th.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned TheStockExchange et. al v. L4ndaakk [2026] FCR 36

    Your Honour, parties are endeavouring (yes, a pun) to come to a settlement agreement. I humbly request the proceedings be tolled for 72 hours for the sake of judicial economy and to allow discussions to materialize into a settlement.
  17. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    DENIED on reconsideration. The cases cited hurt Defense's theory. In all of those FCR cases, the mere allegation of a debt (a judgment) is not itself evidence. An EI is only there to temporarily resolve an ongoing harm or a harm which will become irreversible. No precedent cited supports...
Back
Top