Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. JuliaMC_ [2026] FCR 30

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - Commonwealth of Redmont v. JuliaMC_ [2026] FCR 30 SUMMARY OF PROSECUTION The Commonwealth charged Defendant JuliaMC_ with one count of Breach of Integrity, arising from the public and allegedly unauthorized disclosure of a ticket...
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank v. Panipal_M_B_123 [2025] FCR 41

    Can you point to any law that would permit me to undo an eviction? This isn’t pre-eviction, it’s post-eviction. I understand the plot is collateral, but what would permit me to tell DCT to Honour that collateral agreement.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: In Session Social Democrat Party and Stanley582 v. Commonwealth Of Redmont [2026] FCR 29

    I see no witnesses, thus a trial isn't necessary. @dodrio3 Please present a closing brief including any arguments you'd like on the record. You have until 5/21/26 @ 9pm EST.
  4. M

    Lawsuit: In Session Social Democrat Party and Stanley582 v. Commonwealth Of Redmont [2026] FCR 29

    Denied, this is an essential question of law pertinent to the case at hand.
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank v. Panipal_M_B_123 [2025] FCR 41

    @Panipal_M_B_123 is hereby commanded to draw hither to the Federal Court for the case Volt Bank v. Panipal_M_B_123 [2025] FCR 41
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank v. Panipal_M_B_123 [2025] FCR 41

    The Emergency Injunction is released, the plot is presumed lawfully in the possession of the DCT.
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Pending roy405 v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 42

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order to Show Cause- roy405 v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 42 Summary of Complaint Plaintiff alleges that his arrest on 17 January 2026, carried out by DHS Lieutenant Multiman155, was unlawful by reason of a defective warrant...
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IgnitedTnT v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 20

    The Court cited the wrong SCR case in this verdict, I've made that edit and do memorialize that change publicly.
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IgnitedTnT v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 20

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - IgnitedTnT v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 20 Summary of Complaint The Plaintiff, a sitting Representative, was excluded from the ballot of a Special Election for the House of Representatives by the Department of State on the...
  10. M

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER DENIED. On review of the filings, Plaintiff's arguments are unavailing and recusal is unwarranted. On certain points: 1) The Motion to Dismiss argument is flawed as the Court found in Plaintiff's favour. 2) The Motion to Compel is a...
  11. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    Uhh, silly ko. I'm the Court is in this case lol Also, at this point, summon Staff as a witness, my ticket may have been closed accidentally.
  12. M

    Lawsuit: In Session mar_milk v. Plura72 and Social Democrat Party [2026] FCR 32

    Reviewing. Judge Multiman155 is still the JO on this case for purposes of extensions and other procedural matters as I review the motion.
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Pending roy405 v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 42

    The Federal Court receives the filing. We will discuss internally as how to handle this action.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank v. Panipal_M_B_123 [2025] FCR 41

    @dodrio3 Just to advise you.
  15. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    Discovery for Incarnation__ ends on 5/16 Discovery for Sgt and Leaf shall continue until 5/20, unless @MJL you wish to waive this additional time?
  16. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    Plaintiff's perjury objection overruled. No malice noted. Plaintiff's Objection (#86) overruled. It's a claim, not a fact; Defense counsel is more than welcome to make his accusations. The veracity of those claims are what the Court will address, not the content therein. I will however note...
Back
Top