Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed TheVeryBoredCat v. Town of Aventura [2026] DCR 56

    Where do you see the following statement: "the Town of Aventura neglected its own constitutional duty to maintain its public infrastructure" be supported in any Constitution?
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Vithunder v. joumasepoes69420 [2026] DCR 62

    This is a small claims matter, the Court will proceed in this manner informally. @joumasepoes69420 is commanded to appear before the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in the instant action. The Defendant is not on discord, a govt-announcement will not be made.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Pending megaprogam3r v. Osirisx88 [2026] DCR 57

    These types of filings are unnecessary, please don't make them.
  4. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    (All litigants) As answers come in, please continue asking questions, try to compact them as much as possible. Default judgement is GRANTED. Considering part of the cross-claim requires adjudication of facts that are necessary for the final fact determination of the Complaint, the Court will...
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed TheVeryBoredCat v. Town of Aventura [2026] DCR 56

    Answer deadline tolled. @Cat Oakridge Please respond to the motion within 48 hours.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: In Session Social Democrat Party and Stanley582 v. Commonwealth Of Redmont [2026] FCR 29

    I knew that. I was merely testing the CW. Please respond with your closing argument by 5/30/26 at 9PM EST.
  7. M

    Lawsuit: In Session Social Democrat Party and Stanley582 v. Commonwealth Of Redmont [2026] FCR 29

    Not hearing an objection from Dodrio, the Court enters recess.
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Baguls_ v. ilikefortnite789 [2026] DCR 61

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Sua Sponte Dismissal Upon review of the Complaint filed, the Court finds the pleading defective on its face and dismisses this matter sua sponte. The Complaint fails to plead a date of occurrence, leaving the placeholder "[Date]" in place of...
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed TheVeryBoredCat v. Town of Aventura [2026] DCR 56

    Granted. Please outline your changes in a new post, then edit the complaint.
  10. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    I only expected "No" as your answer. Unless the Supreme Court orders otherwise, you've missed Opening Statements, the presentation of witness questions and the right to object to Plaintiff's witness questions.
  11. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    Was your interlocutory granted counselor?
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Baguls_ v. ilikefortnite789 [2026] DCR 61

    This complaint doesn't have a date when this occurred, you just wrote [Date]
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Pending megaprogam3r v. Osirisx88 [2026] DCR 57

    Granted, 24 hours to respond.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed TheVeryBoredCat v. Town of Aventura [2026] DCR 56

    Please respond to the Complaint within 48 Hours. @dearev Application denied.
  15. M

    Lawsuit: In Session 3mkTalal v. FamousWiseTiger [2026] DCR 47

    @FamousWiseTiger is ordered to appear before the District Court in the above action.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed TheVeryBoredCat v. Town of Aventura [2026] DCR 56

    @Anthony_Org @Budgiebud is hereby commanded to appear before the District Court for the above entitled case.
  17. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    Throws pancake at Ko Certainly counselor. @MsGeorgia @DrThunder7 @Staff @Sergeant__Balls. You are commanded to appear before the Federal Court as witness in the case ko531 v. Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47. Please present yourself and start answer the questions presented to you!
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Pending megaprogam3r v. Osirisx88 [2026] DCR 57

    This is the District Court, not the Federal Court counselor. Thus the majority of your statement is moot.
  19. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Le9endz_ v. AussieBloke25 [2026] DCR 58

    The District Court doesn't have the bandwidth to sustain critically deficient complaints. Please refile your action properly in compliance with the Court Rules. Action dismissed under Rule 2.1 (3) for failure to include the Government. A court can't grant favourable relief from a party not...
  20. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Le9endz_ v. AussieBloke25 [2026] DCR 58

    @Le9endz_ You're looking for money from the Government due to "negligence" yet the Government is not a party to this case. Is this right?
Back
Top