Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    @ko531 @Incarnation__ @MJL Are we done with direct examination?
  2. M

    Lawsuit: In Session Social Democrat Party and Stanley582 v. Commonwealth Of Redmont [2026] FCR 29

    The Court will enter recess on 6/5/26 at 9pm EST.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank v. Panipal_M_B_123 [2025] FCR 41

    @dodrio3 You have until 6/6/26 at 9pm EST to respond
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Stock Exchange et al v. Energy Corp. [2026] FCR 46

    Your Honour, Parties have executed a settlement agreement and wish for this Honourable Court to effectuate it as a binding order of this Court. See below the proposed order for the Court's consideration. [] IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Stipulated Order and Judgment...
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank v. Panipal_M_B_123 [2025] FCR 41

    Seeing no witnesses, the Court doesn't see a need for Opening Statements or testimony. Parties will proceed to provide a closing brief. @dodrio3 You shall have until June 7th, 2026 at 9pm EST to provide that brief. @Dartanboy You shall have 3 days afterwards to submit the same.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Stock Exchange et al v. Energy Corp. [2026] FCR 46

    Yes. Your Honour, There is a sharper tension the writ would resolve. The Defendant's force majeure and good-faith defenses depend on ECO having been a genuine, actively managed company that "tried to steer the company straight" despite poor conditions (Answer). That posture sits awkwardly...
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Stock Exchange et al v. Energy Corp. [2026] FCR 46

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Objection - Relevance Relevance turns on whether the witness has knowledge concerning a contested fact, not on whether they are a named plaintiff. These witnesses are major investors who bought ECO stock on the Exchange. The Defendant placed...
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ebborsnam v. EvilGrift [2026] DCR 71

    The Court administratively dismisses this action for want of full pleadings. The Complaint must establish an injury, not a mere assertion of a harm. Just invoking the Civil Code Act is insufficient. Please refile appropriately.
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ShieldSpammer vs. Department of Justice [2026] DCR 70

    The Court dismisses this action administratively. Please retain counsel if you wish to appeal the summary conviction of a summary offense.
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Stock Exchange et al v. Energy Corp. [2026] FCR 46

    TSE's Witness List and Interrogatories +AmityBlamity (Reason: Director of Defendant with insider knowledge) +Culls (Reason: Director of Defednant with insider knowledge +Multiman155 (Reason: Major investor in ECO stock on TSE) +Dodrio3 (Reason: Major Investor in ECO stock) Interrogatories...
  11. M

    Expungement: Denied Blazin_Beast1121 - Expungement Request

    Denied. 2 months must pass before Expungement is considered.
  12. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    Granted partially on reconsideration. Sergeant_Balls and Loose_Leaf are herein enjoined from selling or otherwise causing the transferrence of any items previously held by ko531 within the commission of the alleged theft. Basically, if there are any seeds, buffs, or other items in their...
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Katto Eugen Strophe-Bragança v. Julia Violent Tempest [2026] FCR 49

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order to Show Cause The Court, having reviewed the Complaint, orders the Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should not be dismissed as frivolous. 1. What basis in law supports the prayer for $1,000,000, given the statutory caps and...
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed TheVeryBoredCat v. Town of Aventura [2026] DCR 56

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order of Dismissal with Prejudice- TheVeryBoredCat v. Town of Aventura [2026] DCR 56 The Town of Aventura, through its Counsel, moves to dismiss the instant action for standing under Rule 2, via Rule 5.5 and Rule 5.12. The presented question...
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Katto Eugen Strophe-Bragança v. Julia Violent Tempest [2026] FCR 49

    The District Court lacks jurisdiction on the manner, it's removed to the Federal Court.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    The ticket isn't appearing in my transcript history for some reason.
  17. M

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. Town of Aventura [2026] FCR 44

    I am now your judge. Please realize that for the next 2 weeks that I'm on vacation. My response time will be terrible, apologies in advance. The 48 hour period of the Order to Show Cause is reset. The CW has until 5/31/26 at 9pm **EDT**
Back
Top