The prosecution does not oppose to answering the question from post #56 and will, once again, treat this as a 4.7 discovery request:
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO 4.7 DISCOVERY REQUEST
The warrant was executed (and this is the date "Yesterday" refers to in the...
Your Honor, may the prosecution request a 48 hour extension to all pending deadlines in the case? This extension is requested due to DoJ leadership requesting that all filings made will be reviewed more closely from now on as this case has gained significant public attention (as indicated by...
OBJECTION - HEARSAY
Your Honor,
Commonwealth objects to the addition of D-004 into the evidentiary record.
It's pretty clearly a hearsay conversation between the defendant's counsel and a potential witness and they aren't under oath.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE
Your Honor,
The Commonwealth would like to submit the following evidence that had just recently came in into the record, per court rule 4.6:
(noting the connection of this to P-004 seizure from the furnaces on the property)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
NOTICE OF PLEA DEAL AGREEMENT
Your Honor,
The Commonwealth of Redmont has reached a plea deal with the defendant, with the prosecution now recommending the following:
- a total fine of 60 Penalty Units (equating to 7200$)
- 10 minutes of...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO INTERVENE
Your Honor,
In the Commonwealth's belief, zPokeBr_ doesn't meet the second prong of rule 3.8 - to Commonwealth's belief, it was not a criminal act to enter the location shown in the warrant, as otherwise the...
As much as defense's proposal of an in-game trial is exciting, I'd like to deny it on behalf of the Commonwealth, as I'd rather gain a little more experience prosecuting cases before possibly accepting such an opportunity. I hope Your Honor and the defense can sympathize.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES
The prosecution responds to interrogatory 3 and 4 as follows:
3. No. The defense is asking for something impossible to do, barring a recording of a suspect planting the plants. The placement of plugin entities...
Your Honor,
The Commonwealth does not object to the response to the first objection.
May the Commonwealth be permitted to respond to to the response to the second objection?
An objection to the motion to strike is forthcoming.
In the interest of not holding up this court any longer, as Commonwealth does not oppose the presentation of evidence in court, the Commonwealth will treat the defense's latest motion to compel as a court rule 4.7 discovery request:
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE...
I'd like to notify the court that I had made a brief clerical error in Objection 1's text and have corrected it, amending "identifying 3 plants present" to "identifying 3 plants not present".
The Commonwealth would like to object to interrogatory 2 on 2 separate grounds:
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE
Your Honor,
The prosecution does not see a link between identifying 3 plants not present in the initial complaint or its evidence submissions and this case.
The prosecutor, despite being the...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY
The prosecution responds to the interrogatory as follows:
1. None explicit, but it's strongly implicit by details noted in complaint - location (basement rather than a display location like ground level decoration...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE
Your Honor,
The Commonwealth would like to submit the following evidence into the record, per court rule 4.6:
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
Your Honor,
The defendant has, once again, failed to provide a response within the allowed time given to them by the court.
I renew my request for the defendant to be held in contempt and for the request for...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION
Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.
unfethum
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:
I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
2. unfethum (Defendant)...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.