Search results

  1. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove [2024] FCR 117

    It should be noted that we still call AlexanderLove as a witness, regardless of whether or not they want to be our witness.
  2. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove [2024] FCR 117

    MOTION TO STRIKE Your honor, While the defendant is able to call whomever they want as a witness, I am struggling to see the relevance in all of these witnesses with the exception of AlexanderLove. For the sake of time and judicial economy, can an injunction be written ordering the defendant...
  3. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove [2024] FCR 117

    Counterobjection: Relevance is related to defendant's defense and evidence: Lawsuit: In Session - Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove [2024] FCR 117 (linking the post @Jakovus made submitting evidence).
  4. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove [2024] FCR 117

    Counterobjection: Relevance is the intentionality behind the statements. It is proof that the defendant intends to practice even if this court grants the injunction disbarring the defendant.
  5. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove [2024] FCR 117

    Counterobjection: Nothing stated in the fact was a lie. The defendant said three times that they would be ghost writing. P-20: "Disbarring me doesn't really stop me either lol I can just ghost write" P-21 "Oh people have tried that before Didn’t work I just ghost write cases It’s inconvenient...
  6. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove [2024] FCR 117

    Counterobjection: While a fact may be struck, the entire claim for relief should not be thrown out as a result.
  7. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove [2024] FCR 117

    Your honor, The plaintiff would like to submit the following pieces of evidence into discovery: P-025: P-026: Witness: Your honor, we would like to call the defendant as a witness. Interrogatory: 1. Relating to Fact #2, what does the defendant mean when they said "I knew all along I was...
  8. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove [2024] FCR 117

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Redmont Bar Association (Represented by Chair Matthew100x) Plaintiff v. AlexanderLove Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: Under the Super Modern Legal Board Act (see Act of Congress...
  9. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove[2024] FCR 115

    Your honor, the RBA consider the vote in P-004 (see Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games) to fulfill the RBA council's vote requirement under section 9.3 of the Super Modern Legal Board Act. The requirements are "Investigation and majority vote of the RBA Council." The Investigation was...
  10. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Redmont Bar Association (RBA) v. AlexanderLove[2024] FCR 115

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Redmont Bar Association (Represented by Chair Matthew100x) Plaintiff v. AlexanderLove Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: Under the Super Modern Legal Board Act (see Act of Congress...
  11. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Redmont Bar Association v. Royalsnakee [2024] FCR 38

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, Members of the Commonwealth reviewing this case today, I would like to address many points made within this case and many points made in the AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF by Mr. Dartanman. I would first like to begin...
  12. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Redmont Bar Association v. Royalsnakee [2024] FCR 38

    Your Honor, We would like to request an additional 24 hours to post our closing statement as you know this is a large case and we want to be very detailed.
  13. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Redmont Bar Association v. Royalsnakee [2024] FCR 38

    Follow-up: 1. Could you ask all staff members with that rank and above if they recall banning Royalsnakee from the forums since January 2024? @End
  14. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Redmont Bar Association v. Royalsnakee [2024] FCR 38

    Follow-Up: 1. Which staff members have the authority to ban someone from the forums? Reworded question: 2. Under what circumstances is someone banned from the forums?
  15. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Redmont Bar Association v. Royalsnakee [2024] FCR 38

    Questions: 1. In the attached screenshot, VerySmolBird stated that players are only banned off of forums if they're an alt account or have a perm deport. If a player is temp deported, they can still access forums. Is this true?
  16. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Redmont Bar Association v. Royalsnakee [2024] FCR 38

    Your Honor, We were suppose to have DC staff called as a witness.
  17. BAR Association of Redmont

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen v. Redmont Bar Association [2024] FCR 46

    Your Honor, Members of the court, This case has been brought before this honorable court on grounds stemming from trivial grievances. The plaintiff's discontent over being denied membership in a committee has led them to clutch at any legal straws to undermine the integrity of the RBA. A a...
Back
Top