This motion is denied. This is not a motion to reconsider, it is effectively an attempt to get around Court Rules to file a brand new Motion to Dismiss after the proper time to do so has passed. The Court shall grant the Prosecutor 48 hours to respond to the allegations of misconduct made in...
I will rule on this motion after the question is answered, as the Court shall not consider the case’s merits further until it is satisfied that it has jurisdiction over this case. In Appeal: Denied - In re [2026] FCR 65 | [2026] SCR 23 the honorable Justice Muggy stated that “Standing determines...
I will now be the Presiding Officer.
Have you removed yourself from this case, or have you not? If you are attempting to remain out of this case, you should not be communicating on behalf of the Plaintiff. The Court will wait for further explanation and, if the above statement is true...
Upon further review, the Court has realized that Plaintiff does not have the appropriate qualifications to practice in the Federal Court. This case is administratively dismissed.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER
The Court orders Plaintiff to contact the Department about resolving the underlying incident before the case is considered further. It is expected that petitioners attempt to resolve matters such as these administratively (see Justice...
This motion is denied. The Plaintiff has not had the opportunity to review and respond to the multiple newly cited precedents within the Defense's Closing Statement, which substantially alter the Defense made, insofar as it forces the Court to consider a larger body of law than was in...
Follow the Federal Court’s ruling, the Court gives Plaintiff 72 hours to file a response legal brief, after which the Court will enter recess for the final time pending a verdict.
For further clarification of what will happen, the deadline tolling shall end at 10 AM CDT on Monday, November 2nd, at which point the Defense shall have 24 hours to post their list of witness questions. This is more than the amount of time that was left on the deadline when it was tolled, but...
Plaintiff references the Redmont Civil Code Act without specifying what part of the RCCA they are relying upon in various parts of the Complaint. Authorities should be cited with the specific parts, sections, and subsections in all Court filings, when possible. In addition, the Court desires...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Upon a cursory review, the Court has found multiple deficiencies in Plaintiff's filing that must be remedied before issuing summons:
1. Rule 1.10 requires that "any cited sources (including statutes, lawsuits, the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.