Search results

  1. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    This motion is denied. This is not a motion to reconsider, it is effectively an attempt to get around Court Rules to file a brand new Motion to Dismiss after the proper time to do so has passed. The Court shall grant the Prosecutor 48 hours to respond to the allegations of misconduct made in...
  2. CreeperTD

    HavenCham v. Frog_Bro_

    I will rule only on this application for an Emergency Injunction. This motion is granted. The DHS shall be informed.
  3. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    Reminds to the Defense that they have around 22 hours to post the list of witness questions.
  4. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending Crown of Alexandria and Dominion of Queendom v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 101

    No, the Court wishes to have the current question answered first before considering other elements of standing.
  5. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending Crown of Alexandria and Dominion of Queendom v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 101

    I will rule on this motion after the question is answered, as the Court shall not consider the case’s merits further until it is satisfied that it has jurisdiction over this case. In Appeal: Denied - In re [2026] FCR 65 | [2026] SCR 23 the honorable Justice Muggy stated that “Standing determines...
  6. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UrbanDispatchMC v. DrippyPVP1234

    This case is dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with the above order before the deadline.
  7. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Jojofortnite v. Vendeka Redmont Bank [2026] FCR 105

    I will now be the Presiding Officer. Have you removed yourself from this case, or have you not? If you are attempting to remain out of this case, you should not be communicating on behalf of the Plaintiff. The Court will wait for further explanation and, if the above statement is true...
  8. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending United Justice Party v. Troniq [2026] FCR 90

    Troniq (@Troniq) is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of United Justice Party v. Troniq [2026] FCR 90.
  9. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed sillyjustin v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    Upon further review, the Court has realized that Plaintiff does not have the appropriate qualifications to practice in the Federal Court. This case is administratively dismissed.
  10. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed sillyjustin v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER The Court orders Plaintiff to contact the Department about resolving the underlying incident before the case is considered further. It is expected that petitioners attempt to resolve matters such as these administratively (see Justice...
  11. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: In Session amah853 v. SteelBirch6844 [2026] DCR 174

    This motion is denied. The Plaintiff has not had the opportunity to review and respond to the multiple newly cited precedents within the Defense's Closing Statement, which substantially alter the Defense made, insofar as it forces the Court to consider a larger body of law than was in...
  12. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed sillyjustin v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    Has the prospective Plaintiff reached out the Department of Homeland Security about this matter?
  13. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: In Session amah853 v. SteelBirch6844 [2026] DCR 174

    Follow the Federal Court’s ruling, the Court gives Plaintiff 72 hours to file a response legal brief, after which the Court will enter recess for the final time pending a verdict.
  14. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed BastionBank v. anasgamerah

    Dismissed without prejudice.
  15. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    For further clarification of what will happen, the deadline tolling shall end at 10 AM CDT on Monday, November 2nd, at which point the Defense shall have 24 hours to post their list of witness questions. This is more than the amount of time that was left on the deadline when it was tolled, but...
  16. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending United Justice Party v. Troniq [2026] FCR 90

    Plaintiff references the Redmont Civil Code Act without specifying what part of the RCCA they are relying upon in various parts of the Complaint. Authorities should be cited with the specific parts, sections, and subsections in all Court filings, when possible. In addition, the Court desires...
  17. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. Anony_M00SE [2026] FCR 100

    The Court recognizes the Plea Deal, and the DHS shall be informed. This case is dismissed with prejudice.
  18. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending United Justice Party v. Troniq [2026] FCR 90

    I will give the Plaintiff 12 additional hours to post the amended complaint before I dismiss this action, but nothing more.
  19. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UrbanDispatchMC v. DrippyPVP1234

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Upon a cursory review, the Court has found multiple deficiencies in Plaintiff's filing that must be remedied before issuing summons: 1. Rule 1.10 requires that "any cited sources (including statutes, lawsuits, the...
Back
Top