Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, the matter before this court rests on one primary question. Did the sudden and unexpected camping trip that the Defendant was taken on nullify the contract between the Defendant and the Plaintiff? The Plaintiff...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE It has now been 72 hours since the Defense was instructed to post questions for their second witness and 24 hours since Your Honor pinged the Defense. The Defense has posted neither questions nor a request for...

RESPONSE No such motion type exists nor does the Court Rules & Procedures establish re-examination as existing. To the best of the Plaintiff's knowledge, there is also no precedent establishing such a thing. Defense claims that the current witness is an adverse witness despite the Defense...

7. How, if at all, has the Defendant's failure to purchase and transfer C117 affected your ability to pay back your mortgage?

RESPONSE Perjury: This represents a misreading of the evidence. The plaintiff's and coshljose's messages clearly indicates that a mortgage had already been agreed to, and that the pending matter for the mortgage is just the production and signing of formal paperwork. The statement "morgage [sic]...

Plaintiff has no further questions for this witness.

6. Describe how the defendant's failure to purchase and transfer C117 has or has not impacted your ability to pay back your mortgage. The plaintiff reserves the right to ask follow-up questions. Clerk note: Question struck by Court.

3. P-004 shows you sending $28,000 to the Defendant. It also shows you discussing a mortgage that you took out. How much of the $28,000 that you sent, if any, is from this mortgage? 4. What did you intend to do with plot C117 when you signed the contract with the Defendant? 5. Why do you no...

Response Re: Non-Responsive - "I was forced to sell" clearly answers the question. If the witness has sold the plot, then they do not still own it. Re: Narrative - Nothing about the question asked indicates that the response was only to be a yes or no. Furthermore, the witness's answer is not...

@fickogames 1. In P-007, you mention that the money you sent to the Defendant came from a loan. Has the Defendant's failure to fulfill their contractual obligations impacted your ability to pay back this loan? 2. D-004 shows you purchasing the plot sometime after the Defendant failed to purchase...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, the Plaintiff once again requests clarification. Is the plaintiff permitted to begin cross-examining the witness in question now, or should that wait until the Defense has questioned the other witness? In either scenario, the...

Your Honor, Plaintiff respectfully requests clarification. What is the deadline for any follow-up questions the Defense has for the party-witness? Is the deadline similarly tolled until 10:15 AM EDT on the 16th of April or was it your Honor's intention that the Defense was to post their...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE Questions 6 and 7 are not relevant to the matter at hand. The status of any council that has or has not been retained by the Plaintiff is fully unrelated to the matter in dispute, which is the breach of the contract...

RESPONSE Section 5 of the Contracts Act defines two types of terms: express terms and implied terms. Section 12 defines the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealings. Consider the line "fickogames lends R$28,000 to Ollie_Minecraft to buy property C117 from the DCT eviction auction". The express...

RESPONSE The Plaintiff respectfully opposes the Defense's Motion to Dismiss. Precedent shows that the dismissal of Claim for Relief 2, 3, and 4 would be improper. I. On The Second Claim for Relief As explained by the Defense, the Redmont Civil Code Act preserves common law torts. Breach of...

RESPONSE The Plaintiff respectfully opposes the Defense's Motion to Dismiss Claim for Relief 1. The motion rests on a misreading of the Redmont Civil Code Act ("RCCA"). Claim for Relief 1 is a properly stated civil claim and should not be dismissed. I. Claim for Relief 1 is Valid Under RCCA...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT The matter before the court is simple. The Defendant signed a contract with the Plaintiff and then failed to uphold their end of the deal. While the Defendant's sudden camping trip resembles a force majeure event, it does...

Apologies, your honor I did not see that ruling was made as I typed this response. I request that it be struck.

RESPONSE In the Defense's motion, it is stated "Opposing counsel reacted to this request with the 'Aye' emoji, and did not make an oppositional statement, their silence on the matter further confirms their assent." Plaintiff's response directly responds to this statement. Furthermore, the...

Response While the Defense is correct in stating that I initially react to the Defense's request with the 'Aye' emoji to indicate an assent to the request, the Plaintiff no longer assents to an extension of discovery. Considering the substantial delay that occurred in this case in the time since...