Search results

Case is remanded to the District Court and will be renumbered accordingly.

Objection overruled. There is not enough evidence to affirm that the statements were made knowingly, nor that some of these statements are unequivocally false (they are under contention and will be resolved within the trial).

This is similarly struck.

Change was one minor clerical edit to change a section number. Objection overruled. That being said, the following filing: is struck from the record. Plaintiff is free to amend their complaint in accordance with the Court Rules of Procedure.

I will remain your PO. Discovery is now open and shall remain open for 5 days. Remember that parties may agree to end Discovery early.

Case is remanded to the Federal Court. It has been renamed accordingly. Motion to dismiss is therefore denied.

Very well, it's accepted. Court is now in recess pending verdict.

I was under the impression I had struck all of them, thank you for letting me know. All of Ebborsnam's posts are struck from the record.

Your motion (Docket #23) said: "I specifically asked any Judge but him. I am ok to wait for a while until another Judge is fit to serve in this case." That is the statement I'm referring to when using the term Judge shopping. Motion denied.

Please present your answer to complaint within 48 hours.

@BAR Association of Redmont (cc: Chairperson @CreeperTD) is hereby commanded to appear in the Federal Court in the case of MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] FCR 72.

Additionally, I find this sentence to be nonsensical. The comparison was drawn by you, counselor. In your objection. If there was something else you meant by this, then please proofread your work. Otherwise please treat this Court with respect under Rule 1.4.2.1 of the Information - Court Rules...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CONTEMPT Attorney @MMiqa has previously been expressly warned not to treat this as a conversation. Rather than desist, they frame their responses as a motion to strike and acknowledge that: Mere filing of a Motion to Strike is fine. However...

Motion denied. The first quote is pertinent to the case, as it is part of your Judge's ruling. Plaintiff only offers a disagreement with the language used in the second quote, not a legal argument in favour of striking said section. The third quote is part of my ruling; ergo, it is pertinent to...

Motion denied. You seem to be trying to move for me to reconsider the Contempt of Court charge in Lawsuit: Dismissed - MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69. This is a different case, and your motion to reconsider does not add any substance to your original motion. Judge shopping is not allowed in...

I find @Ebborsnam GUILTY of Contempt of Court. They shall be fined 30 Penalty Units and be imprisoned for 5 minutes.

Overruled. There is little similarity between both situations.

You are hereby warned not to make unprompted statements in open Court. Failure to abide by this order may result in Contempt charges. This is not a conversation.

Good evening @gribble19, just making sure you are still pursuing this case. Please let me know

@TheREALWINner Is this case still being pursued? Also pinging @Muggy21 for good measure