Search results

Requesting a 48 hour extension, your honour.

Discovery is now open and will remain open for 5 days.

@ILatteralus please make all changes posted in your motion.

That's very unfortunate, do let me know if your circumstances change. Expect witness summons to come shortly, pending a ruling on the MTD.

Witness testimony will come first. Summons will be issued shortly.

I haven't forgotten about this case, just letting you know. Are you still not willing to have an in-game trial? There is still time to reconsider.

@Matthew100x is commanded to appear in the District Court in the case of SCRGabriele180 v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 159.

Please present an Answer within 72 hours.

EI granted. $16,800 shall be frozen.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Plaintiff's counsel misidentifies the Defendant as SuperWoops. The Defense would like the record to reflect the Defendant as Superwoops. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Uploaded evidence is not formatted correctly. Pursuant to Rule 4.6 of the Information - Court Rules and Procedures, the Defendant moves for all pieces of evidence to be struck. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE...

Present.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CRIMINAL CHARGE The Court finds, after reviewing the response to Docket #122, that Plaintiff (and Attorney) @MMiqa has communicated about this case with the presiding officer without making opposing counsel aware of it. The fact that the...

Discovery is now closed. We'll wait for interrogatory answers before moving on.

Granted.

Overruled as moot.

Objection sustained, however the statement will not be struck. The Bar Association of Redmont is warned against making indecorous statements, especially seeing as it is the legal entity tasked with upholding proper values in the practise of law.

Objection overruled, the statements may have come out of ignorance.

Objection overruled, as the statements may come out of ignorance. The matter is now settled by the Court: CreeperTD is not the Defendant and will not be referred to as such.

The objection was denied. We only consider responses to objections when deciding on objections. Thus, sustaining such a motion would serve no purpose. Overruled.